Hello from Chief Judge Beryl Howell's virtual courtroom, where a plea hearing is getting started for Jan. 6 defendant Greg Rubenacker. He's set to become the third person to plead guilty without any agreement with the government. Previously:
Here's the info to dial in to listen to Rubenacker's hearing, plus court rules: dcd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-emerg…
Toll Free Number: 888-557-8511
Access Code: 3318202
Per defense filing, a sticking point in plea negotiations was over sentencing guidelines calculations — Rubenacker didn't want to accept the govt adding points for causing/threatening injury or property damage to obstruct admin of justice s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2120…
The govt has estimated his sentencing range at this point at 41-51 months, reserving the right to request an upward departure (and always with the caveat that this isn't binding on the judge): s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2120…
Howell is going through the timeline of all the conduct that Rubenacker is admitting to. Here's the govt's submission laying it all out: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2120…
Rubenacker sort of pushes back when Howell asks him to confirm he smoked marijuana inside the Capitol. He says he didn't bring it in, so he can't confirm for sure it was marijuana vs. another CBD product. He filmed himself at the time: "Smoke out the Capitol, baby."
There is disagreement between govt and defense about a confrontation between Rubenacker and police — the stipulated facts (what they agree on) is that Rubenacker swung a water bottle at an officer, the govt contends it was specifically swung at the officer's head
Howell says she's watched the videos, and that she'll save a determination about the water bottle issue for sentencing. Rubenacker admits he then sprayed water from the bottle at officers; he was then pepper sprayed
AUSA is confirming that they made a plea offer and it was rejected. The offer was that he could plead to counts 2 & 3 of the indictment, for obstructing an official proceeding and assaulting/interfering with police, the est'd sentencing guidelines range would have been the same
Rubenacker's lawyer confirms the AUSA's description of the offer is accurate, and that they wanted to preserve his right to contest the sentencing guidelines calculation
Howell expresses skepticism at the sentencing enhancement the govt wants applied re: admin. of justice, saying the context of that generally has been judicial proceedings. But she'll consider arguments, and reminds everyone of her discretion to depart up or down from guidelines
Howell stops and asks if Rubenacker is paying attention, noting his head is down (public line is audio-only), he says he is but is experiencing a lot of anxiety and feeling upset about his actions. Howell asks if he wants a break, he says no, he wants to get this done
Howell is making clear that nothing is settled yet about his sentencing guidelines, and that the probation office will now prepare a presentencing report that includes it's own findings for the judge to consider about what the calculation should be
By not taking a deal with the govt, Rubenacker not only is keeping his right to challenge the govt's sentencing guidelines calculation, but also preserving his appeal rights
Howell has formally accepted Greg Rubenacker's guilty plea to the full indictment. Sentencing is set for May 13, no objection from the govt for Rubenacker being allowed to stay on release until then
And that's a wrap
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Court action this afternoon/evening: 2-1 order from the DC Circuit denying request by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to restore appropriated federal funds for refugee resettlement programs that the Trump admin cut off; Judge Millett dissents assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
In a 2-1 order (another Millett dissent), the DC Circuit said it would let Trump fire two independent agency officials, boosting the admin's push to expand his power to control the makeup of these entities. One fired official is preparing to ask the full circuit to reconsider: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Meanwhile, a 4th Circuit panel lifted restrictions on the role that Elon Musk and people affiliated with his DOGE project can play in dismantling USAID (but was divided on the underlying merits of the constitutional fight over the power Musk is exercising) bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
A DC judge said today he’ll likely order the Trump admin's government efficiency office to preserve its records; no immediate ruling on whether DOGE is subject to FOIA buff.ly/mycbsPj
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The judge told the DOJ lawyer appearing today in the DOGE FOIA case to "advise your clients" ASAP about the likelihood of a preservation order. Trump admin contends the records law doesn't apply to DOGE bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
ICYMI: Trump announced a new policy requiring DOJ to demand in court that challengers suing the admin should have to post money bonds if they win orders blocking his actions. Several judges have already rejected such requests buff.ly/11JLZfZ
DC judge denied motion to restrict DOGE access at Treasury. NY judge's injunction remains in place for now.
DC judge said plaintiffs couldn't show irreparable harm re: personal data becoming public -- but they could come back if the situation changed assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Overnight: Washington state AG filed a contempt motion accusing the Trump administration of defying an injunction that blocked cutting off federal funds to institutions that provide gender-affirming care in the states that sued assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
We've got ourselves an old fashioned Friday news dump. What's happened over the past few hours:
- SCOTUS declined, for now, to let Trump oust the head of a federal whistleblower protection agency, letting the official stay in the job until at least Wednesday. From Greg Stohr: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
- DOJ took the unusual step of confirming that it had filed a misconduct complaint against a DC fed judge over her handling of recent hearings in litigation over Trump's effort to bar trans troops from serving in the US military. With Erik Larson: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
A Mass. federal judge set a hearing for tomorrow on whether to immediately halt the Elon Musk-affiliated "Fork in the Road" deferred resignation offer for federal workers from the Trump admin. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Meanwhile, a DC federal judge is holding a hearing now on whether to intervene re: Treasury Dept. giving info to Musk's DOGE team. Prev: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Some more court action later in the day:
- Re: Trump's bar on transgender troops, judge isn't ruling on the motion for an immediate TRO after US basically said status quo will remain pending a fight over a longer-term prelim injunction, but judge says govt must immediately alert her + plaintiffs if that'll change
- DC federal judge set a Friday hearing to consider whether to grant a TRO blocking DOGE from getting access to Dept. of Labor systems and information. See earlier from @swillmer: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Interesting hearing this evening in Missouri’s lawsuit seeking to block DOJ from sending two election observers to monitor a St. Louis polling site on Election Day. No ruling from the bench (recap below)
Complaint: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
DOJ oppo: assets.bwbx.io/documents/user…
Missouri argues state law spells out who can enter a polling place to observe and DOJ monitors aren’t covered. DOJ says there’s a 2021 settlement with the St. Louis board of elections for ADA violations re: disability access that allows this
But Missouri AG says it appeared it was news to state officials that this agreement was in effect, and more broadly, that the board lacked authority to enter into the monitoring term in the first place. Which raises some Qs for the judge...