The early phase of the Covid pandemic in Lombardy, spring 2020. In most provinces (including Lodi and Bergamo) Rt peaked in February, before the onset of mass testing.
The paper reconstructs the beginning of the pandemic before the first public case in Codogno (Feb 14). It was already widespread in Lombardy by mid February, and showed no connection to population density.
The paper reports by symptom onset, so take another 5-6 days off to capture the outbreak by infection date. This confirms the many, statistical mistakes of the "Burn-Murdoch race chart" era. We were chasing ghosts that had passed thru already.
researchgate.net/publication/35…
"Mattia", hospitalized in Codogno (Lodi) on Feb 14, identified as the Covid patient 1 on Feb 20, the very day Rt in Lodi peaked *by symptom onset*. Two day later the first reported death in Vo (Padua), some 180km East.
The cited Riccardo (2020) paper gives us this (Italy-wide) graph, on the difference between date reported and symptom onset. eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…
And finally the geographic flow. We still got the Lodi-to-Ancona route, but more likely now the Bergamo-to-Bolzano route, commensurate with the outbreak northeast of Bergamo. This route continues to Innsbruck, Tyrol.
Aaaand of course something we've known for a long time: the age distribution of mortality from Covid.
It was over before we had a chance to chase the ghosts.
Rt by region, from Riccardo (2020).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝕆𝕝𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣 𝔹𝕖𝕚𝕘𝕖

𝕆𝕝𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣 𝔹𝕖𝕚𝕘𝕖 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @oliverbeige

Jul 4
That the German Social Democrats, former 40% left-of-center working class party turned 15% radical-left party for the postindustrial academic detritus propped up by retirees, tries to push one of their own as candidate for the constitutional court shouldn't surprise anyone.
It's part of an overall pattern of a collapsing Hotelling consensus in Western countries where the declining role of industry leads former labor parties to become increasingly hostile towards labor and instead seek to appeal to an overcredentialed and underqualified neourban...
demographic which more than anything requires putting politics above policy: undermining the democratic institutions in order to push them towards adopting the preferred ideology. It is what radical parties do. The odd thing about the Social Democrats, the party of Brandt,...
Read 8 tweets
Mar 8
That Ukraine thing. I have to admit that I had little to say about the topic, and I didn't pay much attention to frontline shifts or photo-ops in fatigues. The flag-waving and treating the war as some kind of real-life video game was more than a bit unseemly. That said... /1
It was and should've been very clear to anyone with a passing knowledge of strategy that by the time Ukraine switched from a mobile, asymmetric warfare to a grinding trench war of attrition against a resource rich hegemonial power in Nov 2022 its chances of winning evaporated. /2
It's pretty much the last thing one should do in an asymmetric scenario. It still boggles the mind that a major power like the US would misjudge the situation so badly. There was, to stay in the timeframe, the same strategic incompetence on display as during the Corona crisis. /3
Read 21 tweets
Feb 15
There seems to be some trouble understanding the new "transactional" geopolitical stance of the US by those not conversant in politics, strategy, or English. The fundamental idea of a transaction is that it's entered voluntarily and based on an expectation of mutual benefit. /1
If that mutual expectation is no longer given, the transaction is subject to termination or renegotiation, typically at the instigation of the party that no longer benefits – which can also be both parties. /2
An important element to any negotiation is the best available outside option. Beside negotiation skills, divergence in outside options is the key determining factor for how mutually created benefits are divided between parties. /3
Read 7 tweets
Feb 2
I'm mildly amused about the commentariat drawing up Harberger triangles from Econ 101 to "show" that Trump's tariffs are "bad for the economy". That's literally demonstrating that they haven't learned anything new over the last 30 years – or even the last five. /1
Trump has been pretty blunt that he sees the US offshoring its extraction and manufacturing base (its industry for short) as a fatal strategic blunder that sits at the heart of its declining role in the global theater, and that he intends to reverse this. /2
A strategic blunder shared among all administrations of the Reagan-to-Obama era, and the oft-forgotten key element of Trump's political ascendancy was that he pushed the Republican "country club" establishment aside before he did the same with the Democrats. /3
Read 16 tweets
Dec 6, 2024
As a pretty good rule of thumb, you can think of the political travails of most Western economies as a rearguard of an increasingly washed-out center against encroaching, increasingly doctrinary challenges from left and right, with the doctrinary left holding a terrain advantage.
The end of the Hotelling era as I call it, or more popularly, the end of the Merkel era. Left behind by most of the credentialed class that happily moved over to the left-doctrinary camp there's a smattering of hold-outs in the center who cling to dear life for nostalgic reasons.
There's on an abstract level some justification for it. The functioning of a nation state critically depends on an orderly transfer of power, something only a Hotelling competition over the ideological center (the famous "median voter") can provide.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 3, 2024
Emerging public discussion in 🇩🇪 that the internal debate of the German health office @rki_de didn't match the political pronouncements, centering on 17 March 2020 and the call to increase Covid hazard level from "moderate" to "high".

A good opportunity to recapitulate...
...the biggest mistakes that drove the response to the pandemic.

1⃣ The perpetual lack of recognition that we were observing events that had occurred weeks before, and the refusal to account for this.

What exactly happened on March 17? Nothing much in terms of the spread. /2
Like most other countries, Germany started to expand testing rapidly, leading to a massive increase in cumulative numbers, dramatically visualized in dashboards and charts.

But the rate of positive tests (MPC in my nomenclature) stayed mostly the same thru March. /3
Read 44 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(