The Durham story is a Nothingburger (Read):
✅ Durham does not say that Joffe, who got the DNS data, was working for Clinton. In fact he wasn't.
✅ The Cybersecurity experts, who the filing NEVER says was working for Clinton, were investigating malware on WH servers. (THREAD)
✅ Durham does not say that Joffe, who got the DNS data, was working for Clinton. In fact he wasn't.
✅ The Cybersecurity experts, who the filing NEVER says was working for Clinton, were investigating malware on WH servers. (THREAD)
✅ The filing doesn't even say that the white house DNS records were from the Trump era. in fact most of the data associated with the Yotaphone analysis came from the Obama Era.
✅ DNS data is not private.
✅ DNS data is not private.
✅ Joffe had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — including from the White House to search for security breaches and/or threats.
✅ Joffe's information was shared with the CIA so he clearly wasn't sneaking around working for Clinton.
✅ Joffe's information was shared with the CIA so he clearly wasn't sneaking around working for Clinton.
✅ Durham didn't use the word "infiltrate" anywhere in the filing.
✅ Sussmann is who had links to the Dem Party. Joffe merely was a client of the cybersecurity lawyer, Sussmann. There is no link between Joffe and Clinton, other than him having use Sussman as an attorney once.
✅ Sussmann is who had links to the Dem Party. Joffe merely was a client of the cybersecurity lawyer, Sussmann. There is no link between Joffe and Clinton, other than him having use Sussman as an attorney once.
The right wing media will continue to twist this story and make it something it is not. They do this knowing that the filing doesn't provide any additional material and that the case is a tough one for the layperson to understand. Misinformation feeds off of ignorance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
