Julian Sanchez Profile picture
Feb 15 4 tweets 1 min read
So, this feels like cheating a little. Doubtless we’re “better informed” on net, in that we have instantaneous easy access to all sorts of facts that once would have been either totally unavailable or required lengthy research most people won’t do...
The problem of misinformation is more a problem of *convergence* on a set of interlocking false beliefs about important matters, held with high conviction, that yield coordinated action.
It might well be that 30 years ago, people had a numerically larger number of assorted false beliefs about elections. But now a lot of people have the same seemingly-incorrigible false belief about elections, and are acting to install election officials who share it.
Even if there is some sense in which, on the whole, we are “better informed” about elections today, the form the misinformation today takes is pretty clearly a much bigger problem.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julian Sanchez

Julian Sanchez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @normative

Feb 16
This is a very strange conception of “liberty,” and reveals a very strange concept of how education works. I learned about all sorts of wrong ideas at my (private) university—including Marxism!—and do not consider myself “poisoned."
It is difficult to think of a more chillingly Soviet principle than Dan Patrick’s: That ideas are poisonous, and therefore politicians must determine which are the Correct Ideas fit for discussion in a university classroom.
In college, I read the views and arguments of Marxists and libertarians, Kantians and utilitarians, natural law theologians and Rawlsians, relativists and rationalists, Cartesians and physicalists…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 16
I suppose I need to do a proper thread about this Durham filing folks are losing their minds over. OK, here goes.
First, virtually none of what appeared in the recent filing from Durham’s office is new information. Here’s a New York Times story from *over four months ago* with basically all of it. nytimes.com/2021/10/01/us/…
Second, nothing in the filing supports breathless claims technically illiterate cable hosts are making. It does not allege anyone “hacked” Trump computers, or was paid to “infiltrate” networks, or that anyone “intercepted e-mails and text messages."
Read 52 tweets
Feb 11
So, this is all maddeningly vague, but a couple of observations based on the very limited information available…. wyden.senate.gov/news/press-rel…
The bulk program referenced here was the subject of one of two PCLOB “deep dives” into EO 12333 programs, summarized (barely) in what can charitably be described as a rather disappointing public report at the culmination of a six-year investigation. documents.pclob.gov/prod/Documents…
The first “deep dive” concerned a financial records collection program, and the report notes CIA had implemented or was implementing all PCLOB’s recommendations. The second “deep dive” ended with a set of staff-produced recommendations in 2020, but nothing on CIA’s response.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 10
I just got a graphic novel adaptation of Nineteen Eighty-Four and was pleasantly surprised to see they included the Appendix “Principles of Newspeak” (as unillustrated text). I think readers often forget about it, but it’s a diegetic appendix and radically alters the ending.
For those who haven’t read it recently: “Principles of Newspeak” is an explanation of how Oceania's totalitarian government controlled thought through language. But critically, it’s written *by future historians within the world of the novel* explaining a defunct system.
So while (what most think of as) the novel proper ends with the triumph of Big Brother, the appendix makes clear the regime has fallen, and strongly implies that this collapse occurred sometime before 2050. Turns out Nineteen Eighty-Four has a happy ending! Sort of.
Read 25 tweets
Feb 8
Technically illiterate county officials in NM are about to waste $50,000 in public money “investigating” nonsensical fantasies about hacked voting machines, in a county Trump won by 25 points. washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
Chaser: They want to contract the “investigation” out to a notorious charlatan & crank best known for falsely (but very insistently) claiming that he invented e-mail (about a decade after e-mail was invented).
The worst part is that Ayyadurai has a long history of using his MIT credentials to launder absolute nonsense & make it sound technical & impressive to the untrained. Like this inept effort to statistically demonstrate vote tampering in MI.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 4
It’s nice to hear Pence state clearly that he had no right to overturn the election; would’ve been nicer if he’d more strongly said there was no legitimate reason to question the result.
The cowardly dodge here is to make noises about “irregularities,” which is conveniently ambiguous between “real but ultimately trivial issues that arose as a byproduct of doing an election during a pandemic” and “the lunatic conspiracy theories the base now believes."
See, when your respectable friends ask what “irregularities” means, you can point out that the West Slothrop County Registrar authorized additional ballot dropboxes to be installed in a manner inconsistent with subsection B of section 243.2 of the state election code…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(