I've read the Emergencies Act order-in-council and spoken to several lawyers – no one has any idea whether the government will target individual convoy donors because they've provided no info about what they plan to do.
What the order does indicate is that the government is viewing support for the convoy in the same way it views money laundering and terrorist financing.
What's also clear is that the government has given banks carte blanche to report and freeze accounts based on "suspicion" alone, without liability. Does someone withdrawing cash from an Ottawa ATM fit the bill? An Interac etransfer to someone in Ottawa? No one knows.
Before the predictable chorus of "Well, if you have nothing to hide...", a couple of notes:
1) Donating to a peaceful protest is not illegal. 2) When government suspends due process and proof requirements, even those with nothing to do with any of this could be caught up in it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Police have just taken down a man who was in the crowd. He appeared to be vigorously resisting the arrest. The main speaker says he was reported to police by the protesters because he was not “being safe.”
Police established a large human perimeter around the takedown. I was inside it and not asked to leave just by virtue of where I was standing.
Crowd is now applauding police as they remove the man.
The government gave three criteria for prohibited protests.
The Parliament Hill protest does not interfere with trade, and the Hill is not critical infrastructure.
This means only justification to declare it unlawful is 2(c), for which no evidence has been provided.
Please correct me if I'm misreading something, but I just don't see how the Ottawa protest (as opposed to border blockades) is even addressed by this order, though Ottawa police are using this order as justification to threaten arrest on anyone present.
This is a highly relevant question as the government continues to claim it is not infringing on the right to peaceful assembly. At what point does a peaceful, lawful assembly (many of which shut down streets, admittedly not for several weeks) become an unlawful one?
Marco Mendocino said the people arrested on gun charges in Coutts were part of a far-right group with a presence in Ottawa. Asked for details, he backtracked: "The rhetoric that supported the movement in Coutts is very similar...to the kind of rhetoric we're seeing" in Ottawa.
So the public safety minister was just making stuff up?
Another reporter presses Mendocino on whether there was a real connection between the guns in Coutts and protesters in Ottawa – and Mendocino rolls, and admits it was just his own conclusion from social media.
Under Trudeau's Emergency Act order, it's illegal to bring a minor within 500 metres of a banned "public assembly."
Though it's also illegal to bring yourself there too.
Here's now the government defines prohibited public assemblies. Critical infrastructure is a broad category which includes anywhere vaccines are administered. Parliament Hill is in a separate category.
Tuned into a Twitter Space on which trucker convoy spokesperson @BJdichter is speaking. A few details about the financial situation of the convoy.
The ~$1 million released from the initial GoFundMe campaign to a TD Bank account has been frozen by TD and is supposed to be, Dichter says, transferred to a trust account held by the convoy's lawyer, Keith Wilson. This has not happened yet.
Convoy organizers had requested a transfer from the GiveSendGo campaign (the platform used after GoFundMe spiked initial campaign) just before the Ontario Superior Court issued order freezing funds. When this happened, Dichter says convoy had GiveSendGo reverse transfer.