The printer industry has always surfed the leading edge of dystopian business practices, pioneering the most disgusting, deceptive tactics for ripping off customers by locking them into buying half-full ink cartridges at $12,000/gallon. 1/
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Printer companies have used *copyright law* to attack refillers, pushed out fake "security updates" to trick you into installing code to block third-party ink, cheated and lied to block "security chips" from being harvested from e-waste and used in new cartridges and more. 3/
There is no depth so low that printer companies will not stoop to it. Forcing you to waste ink by printing "calibration sheets"? Sure. Suckering buyers with "lifetime" ink deals and then suddenly ending them? Why not?
But there's one depravity that no printer company has managed: putting DRM in *paper*. Oh, not for lack of will! But adding DRM to paper is hard, because paper is...well, it's paper. Pressed sheets of vegetable pulp. It's hard to put a cop-chip in a sheet of paper. 5/
But what about a *roll* of paper?
See where this is going?
If you're a well-organized person, you might have a @DymoSupport label maker around the house. I grew up with Dymo's original embossing tape label makers and gleefully labeled everything important to me. 6/
In the years since the company was founded, it's been agglomerated, snapped up by @newell_brands, owners of Rubbermaid, Mr Coffee, Yankee Candles, Elmer's, Sharpie, X-Acto and many others:
Divisions a these corporate hydras are under relentless pressure to wring more profits out of their workhorse products. Which is how Dymo came to invent - wait for it - *DRM for paper*. 8/
Dymo's desktop label-makers enjoyed a boom during the lockdown, thanks to the shift to e-commerce and the demand for shipping labels. But those windfall profits weren't enough for the company. 9/
They just released two new models, the 550 and the 5XL, whose DRM prevents you from using third-party labels:
Third-party labels for desktop label-makers are ubiquitous. Different manufacturers produce them, differentiating on materials, size, and adhesive. Oh, and price, naturally. Dymo's own-brand labels are fine, but they cost more than comparable rival labels. 11/
The new label rolls come with a booby-trap: a RFID-equipped microcontroller that authenticates with your label-maker to attest that you bought Dymo's premium-priced labels and not a competitors. 12/
The chip counts down the labels as you print them (so you can't transplant it to a generic label roll).
Dymo clearly understands that its customers don't want this. Dymo owners who buy non-Dymo labels aren't being tricked into it - they're seeking out alternatives. 13/
No surprise that Dymo's sales materials don't mention this new, unprecedented restriction.
In forums and online reviews, Dymo owners are fuming, rightly accusing the company of ripping them off. 14/
Some are speculating about how to reprogram the cop-chip in their labels, but anyone who provides a tool to do so risks felony prosecution under Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (penalty: 5 years and $500k for a first offense). 15/
This is a good reason to reform or overturn the DMCA (as EFF is seeking to do with its lawsuit against the US government):
But in the meantime, this is a rare instance in which individuals can make a difference. 16/
Dymo has *lots* of competitors, whose comparable printers cost the same as the new DRM-burdened models. 17/
Even with the cost of throwing away your new Dymo and buying a @ZebraTechnology or MFLabel replacement, you will still come out ahead once you factor in the savings from buying any labels you choose. 18/
Dymo is floating a trial balloon here, checking to see whether printer owners will accept DRMed paper as well as ink (ironically, Dymo pitches the fact that its label printers are inkless as an advantage because you sidestep ink price-gouging!). 19/
We can pop that balloon before it attains altitude.
Very rarely, I find an article that I want to share, but whose every line so so perfect that I can hardly bear to summarize it because I just want to repost the whole thing, peppered with "HELL YEAH"s. 1/
That's how I feel about @anildash's "That broken tech/content culture cycle."
Dash lays out a playbook for firms that claim to be "tech companies" but rely on cultural production to grow and profit - a playbook that we've seen used so many times that it's impossible to credibly call what emerges from it an "unintended consequence." 3/
This coming weekend (Feb 18-20) I'm a (virtual) guest at the @boskonenews sf convention. I'm doing several panels and my first-ever reading from *Red Team Blues,* my forthcoming novel from @torbooks.
Over and over in the history of labor rights, we see the same story: if workers exclude a group from labor protections, bosses will recruit that group to scab against them and smash their power. 1/
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Xenophobes argue that this means we should block immigration to head off competition with low-waged workers, but history teaches us that this is a losing move.
The winning move is solidarity with every worker, regardless of immigration status, national origin, gender, or age. 3/
I hated Facebook from the start and couldn't wait for it to die. That was a pretty reasonable thing to expect. After all, I'd watched social networks from Sixdegrees on crash and burn as the network effects that drove their growth also drove their precipitous collapse. 1/
A system enjoys "network effects" if it increases in value as it adds users. Social networks are all about these effects: you join Facebook because your friends are there, and once you join, others sign up because *you* are there. 2/
But there's a hard corollary: systems driven by network effects *lose* value when users leave. Your blender doesn't get better when someone else gets a blender of their own, but it also doesn't get worse when someone else throws theirs away. 3/
This coming weekend (Feb 18-20) I'm a (virtual) guest at the @boskonenews sf convention. I'm doing several panels and my first-ever reading from *Red Team Blues,* my forthcoming novel from @TorBooks.
The pandemic presented an opportunity to reconsider our seemingly immutable assumptions about life - for adults, anyway. We got the Great Resignation and "hybrid" work-from-home. Our kids got remote learning. Ugh. 1/
Don't get me wrong: remote learning has advantages, especially for kids coping with physical/mental health issues; engaged with non-school interests; or escaping a discriminatory and bullying environment (this isn't as good as *addressing* discrimination and bullying, but…). 2/
But the remote learning boom has emboldened the absolute worst in the ed-tech sector. It's not just that these companies are price-gouging our schools and normalizing surveillance for kids. 3/