This article cites βprominent presidential historiansβ as predicting Biden would be the next FDR and for evidence, linked to an NPR interview with Doris Kearns Goodwin.
Meanwhile, my sense is every practicing historian who is not a professional commentator has said the opposite.
Scholarly historians always laugh at the notion of a βpresidential historian.β Precisely for the reason that someone who focuses overwhelmingly on the presidencyβespecially from a biographical perspectiveβtends to have a very limited stable of analogies & interpretive frameworks.
Second, historians, especially those who study American politics, have always understood that whatever they thought of Bidenβs own agency, his presidency would be constrained by razor thin majorities in Congress & a reactionary Supreme Court. And you didnβt need a PhD to see that
Like, reserving a small number of spots for the children of potential large donors may offend your sense of fairness but those future donations aren't affecting tuition rates.
This quote is shocking, as it was designed to be. Be skeptical.
For example, were all Americans excited about going to the Moon? No. This poll is from 1967, two years before Apollo 11. Going to the moon is "not worth it" by 20 points.
Nearly a year after the first moon landing (and half a year after the second), the results are nearly the same.
As someone whoβs contributed to my universityβs policy on returning, this article misstates, misframes, and misinforms about what we are doing and why. No one thinks this is 3/20 & our brief window of remote instruction is precisely to insure the rest of the semesterβs in-person.
Everyone on campusβstudents, staff, and facultyβoverwhelmingly prefer in-person instruction (though we, like others, will probably experiment with more hybrid courses in the future if they work). Prof. Oster is right that the health risks now to most students are very low.
Itβs true that not everyone on a campus is 18-24 years old & in otherwise perfect health. Yes, there are staff, faculty, & students who remain at greater risk, either unable to get vaccinated or for whom vaccination is insufficient protection. These will remain risks to manage.