1/ There's a ton of action in Congress on stablecoin regulation right now & @RepJoshG just proposed a draft bill with the best language we've seen yet.
It said all stablecoin issuers should be insured depository institutions (read: banks), which is a very bad idea.
But it also suggested that federal agencies lack authority to regulate stablecoins & said Congress must take action.
4/ So now Congress is focused on stablecoins, holding two hearings in the last two weeks.
As is becoming typical, House Financial Services was constructive & positive while Senate Banking was more hostile (with exceptions, as you'll see below).
They're also writing new bills...
5/ ...rather than revisiting old ones, which is a good sign, because none of those were reasonable options.
For example, you might remember the STABLE Act from late 2020, which said all stablecoin issuers had to get a bank charter. I haven't heard anyone mention it this year. 👍
6/ Which brings us to @RepJoshG's draft bill published yesterday, not only the best we've seen, but really quite good. Let me explain why:
The bill creates a new regulatory classification for "qualified stablecoins" that meet certain minimum standards of safety & soundness.
7/ Qualified stablecoins would be supervised by the OCC, subject to collateral restrictions, & required to have insurance.
The benefit of bearing those compliance costs: qualified stablecoins would be exempt from regulation as securities by the SEC or derivatives by the CFTC. ✅
8/ Two features of the bill deserve added praise:
- it explicitly allows nonbanks to issue stablecoins
- it uses an opt-in model, so issuers who want to take advantage of it can, but none are forced to
This strikes a great balance between mitigating risk & enabling innovation.
9/ The opt-in model is important for DeFi stablecoins that use crypto-collateralized or algorithmic mechanisms, which would be unaffected.
This is exactly the right approach: addressing risks we understand now without creating a regulatory moat for some at the expense of others.
10/ Rep. Gottheimer's bill is the first really good proposal we've seen, but perhaps not the last.
On the other side of Congress, @SenToomey is working on his own bill, & given how great he's been on crypto, I'm very excited to see what he comes up with.
11/ While Congress keeps making progress, I assume regulators will exercise restraint & let our elected representatives do their work, rather than pushing their authority past its breaking point to try regulating stablecoins.
I hope my assumption is correct. If not, trouble. 😶
12/ Elsewhere in DC, there's talk of a US dollar central bank digital currency (CBDC), but not much interest beyond a small group.
The Fed issued its long-awaited CBDC report last month. The response from industry & many policymakers has been "no thanks."
13/ To summarize, although it's hard to get Congress to agree on anything these days, we're seeing a lot of positive momentum on both sides of the aisle.
I'm more optimistic than ever about smart stablecoin regulation that works for everyone: consumers, industry, & government.
14/ If you're a US crypto company looking to have your voice heard in the legislative process, or a policymaker in DC working on stablecoin regulation, please reach out to me & @blockchainassn. We're here to help.
I'll keep you all updated as this develops. Stay tuned.
[end]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A small silver lining of a crypto bear market is that it may relieve some regulatory pressure.
For good reason, regulators with limited resources focus attention on issues with widespread impact & systemic importance.
To a degree, shrinking markets = lower risk = less focus.
2/ Regulators looking at the crypto market over the last 12-18 months see a high-risk speculative mania inflated by unrealistic or even false promises.
They assume it will end badly for most participants just like it did after the 2017 ICO bubble & they want to limit the damage.
3/ They're particularly concerned because of how much retail participation they see in the 2022 edition.
With a few exceptions (like Katy Perry's crypto claws), the 2017 bubble didn't really breach the mainstream before it blew up.
President Biden signed the bill into law on Monday. The crypto tax provisions are officially set to take effect on January 1, 2024 (for FY2023 reporting).
Several members of Congress have already proposed new bills to fix this 👇
2/ As a reminder, the infrastructure bill imposed tax reporting requirements on an unknown but possibly massive number of actors in crypto, even where compliance is impossible.
This could include miners, validators, software developers, wallet providers, NFT creators, & more.
3/ The bill has three main flaws:
- the broker definition, which could force nearly everyone in crypto to do tax reporting
- the digital asset definition, which could apply to anything on a blockchain
- the cash transaction report expansion, which is the infamous 6050I provision
I really can't wait to explain @ConstitutionDAO to folks here in DC.
This is Web3 at its best: thousands of passionate people coming together to fund the preservation of a historic document & make it available to the American public after decades in private hands. Truly amazing.
The Constitution isn't just a set of laws or a historic artifact. It's a symbol of the freedom & opportunity at the heart of our democratic experiment.
Before Web3, who would've imagined that anyone, regardless of background, could participate in the American dream in this way?
I admit I've been a little emotional about it the past few days. Many of the notes from people who've joined are deeply moving.
I feel this on a personal level too, as a grandchild of immigrants who came to America fleeing persecution across the sea. 🇺🇸