This is incredible. Second-most powerful politician in Texas sent a deceptive mass mailer giving bad voter registration information to the public, putting their votes at risk texastribune.org/2022/02/17/tex…
New Texas voting laws are already creating confusion about vote-by-mail, leading to 25-40% of ballots being rejected in some counties. Elected officials should be helping to reduce this confusion. Patrick is making it worse. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/how-to-think…
Dan Patrick pushed Trump's fraud narrative. Which has reduced trust in elections. Patrick has used that distrust to then justify misleading voters into sending their request for ballots to *the wrong office.* Absolute contempt for the public.
Currently, the Texas Secretary of State is both:
a) arguing that it is illegal for an election official to encourage people to vote-by-mail
b) changing its own practices to minimize the damage being caused by a fellow party member deceiving members of the public.
Even setting aside the deception, the idea that state-wide (read Republican) elected officials can encourage people to vote-by-mail, but local (in some cases, Democrats) cannot seems obviously bad.
Some of the voting law changes in TX are targeted at kneecapping Dems. But in this case vote-by-mail is mostly limited to older voters who lean Republican, as will anyone likely to respond to Patrick's partisan mailer.
They will hurt their own voters to own the libs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Even by the very degraded standards of Wisconsin democracy this is truly extraordinary jsonline.com/story/news/pol…
We are well past the point of saying “uh-oh, democracy is in trouble.” Conspiracy nuts are trying to use state power to imprison public officials for resisting their efforts to overturn elections.
And it’s a local story as opposed to a national scandal. jsonline.com/story/news/pol…
It’s no exaggeration to say that the people who fought to defend American democracy in 2020 face greater personal threat and legal jeopardy than the people who sought to destroy it. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/a-year-on-th…
The University of Texas faculty called for respecting academic freedom and in response the Lt Governor has called for ending tenure protections and firing faculty who teach in areas he dislikes.
This is true, but also entirely opposite to the way that Patrick believes and wants to see.
In the meantime, faculty at privates and blue state institutions are emailing those UT faculty they always wanted to recruit. Net effect will be to weaken higher Ed in Texas.
When Scott Walker messed with tenure in WI a bunch of talented faculty started heading for the door. Most of them did not feel personally vulnerable but did not see a long-term commitment to protecting higher Ed in the state. Same will happen in Texas.
There is a debate about why economists are paid a premium within social science.
One market-based response is that economists are scarce relative to demand (see below). But since economists control the supply of economists (through grad admissions) what does that tell us?
Maybe economists are better negotiators. This might be true at the margin, but in most places there are broad disciplinary bands. If you are a sociologist getting $80K & 2/2 load, you can try asking for $160K 1/1 load your peer in the Econ dept is getting, but it won't work.
Maybe economists are just smarter. I guess that depends on the criteria you use to evaluate "smart." But based on those prioritized by Econ, the academics in stats and math should be paid more. But they are not. aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…
This piece quotes some of the smartest people I know about how to make government work (full disclosure, I married one of them).
Lets start with @pamela_herd
Nodding along to @ElizabethLinos here. (Noting she has been promoted to "economist" - congrats!)
For better or worse, the US system of government depends on political appointees to lead public organizations. Hawley, Cotton and Cruz are serial offenders when it comes to blocking qualified appointees for their pet reasons…or for no reason at all
Hard to top the time that Cotton blocked Obama's nominee to Ambassador to Barbados for reasons that had nothing to do with her. After more than 800 days waiting for a hearing, she died waiting.
My normal tag-line for this sort of thing is "the commanding heights of universities are actually conservative places" but honestly, there is nothing conservative about this.
Doesn't seem like too much to ask that the leaders of American higher education institutions support American democracy ajc.com/education/geor…
If you think Purdue participating in a Stop the Steal rally is not disqualifying for a higher ed position, he also made clear in his job as Secretary of Agriculture that he was perfectly willing to punish researchers whose views did not align with his.