Oof. Hong Kong levies fines in excess of a month's pay to domestic workers who gathered with friends on their day off. When Hongkongers band together to raise money to pay the fines, a government official declares it illegal and the fundraiser is cancelled.
Hong Kong has a huge number of live-in domestic workers who are citizens of other countries, and since they have no homes of their own in HK, these workers often gather with friends in public spaces on Sundays—their standard day off.
Under Hong Kong law, such workers are required to live in the homes of their employers, which means they don't have access to private spaces of their own to socialize during their time off.
Last Sunday, Hong Kong police gave out seventeen citations for gatherings in violation of HK's two-person maximum. All of the citations went to domestic workers. All of them.
The citations carried fines in the amount of HK$5000, which is $640 US. The legal minimum monthly salary for a Hong Kong domestic worker is HK$4630, or about $595 US.
Yes, you read that right.
And bear in mind, we're talking about public gatherings of small numbers of people here, primarily outdoors. On Sundays in HK, plazas, pedestrian bridges, even wide sidewalks are lined with groups of three, four, five women sitting and eating, talking, playing cards.
Again, this is these workers' only time off all week, and their only opportunity to spend time away from their employers. (98+% of these workers are women, and 96% are from the Philippines or Indonesia.)
Anyway, it's a small story in the scope of all the horrors of the world, but the horrors of the world are made up of small stories.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today was the day that I realized that the ridiculous "The World" artificial archipelago in Dubai is based on the Mercator projection, with as many islands representing Greenland as all of South America.
As I've mentioned before, I spend a day in each of my classes each semester talking about map projections—how they're constructed, why they look the way they do, and so on. Why is north up? Why is Europe in the middle? That sort of thing.
Today, near the end of class, someone asked about the "The World" project, and what version of best practices in cartography it reflects. I'd never looked at it from that perspective, so I went to check. And wow.
Black History Month is February because Negro History Week was in February. Negro History Week was in February because of Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln's birthdays. But we don't actually know Frederick Douglass's birthday.
Frederick Douglass was kept apart from his mother by the man who enslaved them both, and only saw her a few times in his life. Like many enslaved people, he did not know his birthday.
In one version of the telling, his mother once referred to him as "my valentine." In another, she made him a heart-shaped cake the last time they met. Either way, he said he took it as a clue, and as an adult he chose Valentine's Day as his birthday.
The thread linked above is very good and very clear, and well worth reading.
I've been arguing for years for the importance of the specificity of the term "white supremacy"—referring, as it originally did, to the political project of implementing white rule. It really is an essential framing for understanding the modern GOP.
Once a year I emerge from my lair, see my shadow, and remind you that Al Franken is never going to be a US Senator again. thehill.com/homenews/senat…
Last time this came up, I noted that Minnesota's two senators are both women, and both much younger than Franken. Neither is retiring soon, and his not going to challenge either of them in a primary.
Since then, Franken has apparently moved to New York City. He recently conceded the obvious fact that there's no way in hell he's going to primary Gillibrand, and that leaves Chuck Schumer.
More than half of the 38 Harvard professors who signed an open letter backing an accused sexual harasser on the college's faculty now say they no longer stand by the statement. bostonglobe.com/2022/02/08/met…
Twenty of the 38 signers have withdrawn their names. This after two of the twenty released a statement saying that the letter wasn't intended to say what it very clearly said. thecrimson.com/article/2022/2…
Four more Harvard profs removed their names from the Comaroff support letter overnight, bringing the total to 24 withdrawals out of 38 signatories. bostonglobe.com/2022/02/08/met…