When @JuliaRaifman sent @drlucybmcbride this Tweet, McBride's response was: "Fear & shame aren't motivating."
Imagine the parents reading that their baby should be kept out of sight so that others might not be afraid.
This is the darkness of #UrgencyofNormal. 🧵
This is McBride's response in full. Notice McBride, after having shown no compassion for the passing of this little girl, no compassion for the grief of her parents, suggests, "Empathy & Compassion for all."
Who does she mean?
Notice McBride retweeted; to what end?
In the replies, McBride responds to the suggestion Rainfman's Tweet is "not offered in good faith." If you follow @JuliaRaifman you will know this is untrue. Yet McBride is quick to embrace the sentiment saying, "Exactly" adding that Raifman is "resorting" to bad tactics.
Ironically, McBride adds, she would not "motivate ppl to care abt mental health by sharing details abt suicide deaths."
McBride might not go into details but if you follow her, you'll know about suicides. If you aren't careful, you'll assume the suicides are due to restrictions.
After Raifman suggests restrictions stay in place longer to prevent another baby's death, McBride wants to know how many lives would be saved and how we'd explain the delay to depressed kids.
How quickly McBride has forgotten about the baby.
That picture is where I'd start.
All of this comes up in the context of McBride Tweeting about her son's disappointment that he can't have lunch in his college cafeteria. So when McBride asks about "college kids", it makes me wonder if what she's worried about are those kids who can't eat in the cafeteria.
Lucy McBride wants to talk cost-benefits. Fine. But I worry about having that discussion with someone who puts so little value on life, who won't discuss the children who die.
Why not? Their deaths are part of the cost.
As much part of the cost as closed cafeterias.
We should all have the composure of @JuliaRaifman. Noticing McBride is retweeting her unkindly, Raifman wishes her well.
I wish us all well and I wish us all better than what #UrgencyofNormal has to offer.
End.
@JuliaRaifman Naturally, I find too late a mistake and it's always in the first Tweet. I am referring, or course, to @drlucymcbride not @drlucybmcbride.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@ShiraDoronMD et al argue against universal masking in healthcare based on 2 claims: 1) transmission risk from HCWs w/out symptoms is low 2) vaccination is sufficienly protective against hospital-acquired infection.
These claims are both knowably, provably wrong.
@AnnalsofIM
🧵
To establish their first claim, that the risk of transmission from HCWs without symptoms is low, the authors cite two sources: a) Killingley and b) Tayyar.
But a) Killingley does NOT show presymptomatic transmission risk is small. What Killingley actually shows is that, what the authors pass off as "minimal presymptomatic shedding," is consistent with **44% of transmission occuring presymptomatically**.
In honor of @TracyBethHoeg’s new anti-mask propaganda/preprint, I compiled her Tweets on mask studies into a textbook I’m calling, “Confounders: A Matter of Convenience.” It’s an expose of Hoeg’s bad faith hypocrisy. 🧵
Here’s the title page with a table of contents.
CHAPTER I:
HOW TO PROTEST PRO-MASK STUDIES
It's easy! Just complain the conclusion doesn’t hold because the data is confounded! 1. Eg. The Boston Mask Study
The moral panic over school closures has left us with problems more intractable than they were pre-pandemic because now, to solve those problems, we first have to dispel lies. That school is a preventative to suicide is a reprehensible distortion, but it is not the only one. 🧵
There is the hysteria over how closures hurt minorities the most which obscures that, for minorities, school is the source of a problem: the school-to-prison pipeline. nytimes.com/2020/10/28/opi…
There is the hysteria that closures are causing obesity which obscures the problem of fatty, nutritionally bankrupt cafeteria food. nypost.com/2019/11/16/the…
Following a lead in @mehdirhasan's receipt-riddled expose, I looked into FL's deadly summers but in terms of excess deaths (Hasan uses C0VID deaths) in the 10 US states with the highest percentage of seniors. Tl;dr: DeSantis won't be using these stats on the campaign trail. 🧵
The long list of concerns downplayers coopted for the sake of opening schools and then quickly abandoned: learning loss that didn't carry over to C0VID related cognitive declines, newsinfo.inquirer.net/1639956/omicro…
Shenoy et al urge abandoning universal masking on the grounds masks have little benefit & some harm. Yesterday I showed they're wrong about benefits. Today I show they're wrong about harms. Their strongest evidence favors masks. The rest has little relation to their ambitions. 🧵
In making the case that masks harm, the authors use three sources.
In Cormier et al patients & providers rate their masked & unmasked encounters in terms of communication difficulties. Using scales from 1-5 (patients) or from 1-6 (providers) participants are asked about eg. listening effort, ability to connect, understand & recall.