Marco Rogers Profile picture
Feb 20 21 tweets 6 min read
Here's a description of what's happening with Opensea. See if you understand it and decide how you were supposed to avoid it as a casual user.
Keep in mind, what you get from the community is that the way to avoid scams is "education". Can someone tell me what education was supposed to help people avoid this Opensea exploit?
So what failed here? Opensea has been around for years. And the educators have been in full force. What was supposed to happen here that didn't happen?
It is a common phishing attack. What I'm getting from crypto advocates is "it's not Opensea's fault". And that's to be expected. In this new decentralized utopia, it's only your own fault if something bad happens to you.
The idea that someone can send you a simple link and that allows all of your money to be stolen. And people are like "that sucks but working as designed". And those same people are like "wait, why don't you trust me?!"

I just don't get it.
I have been told by crypto advocates that this is not the technical definition of an "exploit" and it's irresponsible to keep saying that. Just FYI. No solutions. No concern for those impacted. Just "shut up".
Maybe I misrepresented things here. The original thread doesn't tell you how to avoid the exploit. It only tells you what happened from a technical perspective. It's targeted towards technical people who already understand the ecosystem.
I have yet to find a thread that talks about the actual phishing email and how to tell it wasn't legitimate. I mean I haven't been looking that hard to be fair. But crypto people always manage to find me when they wanna yell at me so...
Here's the Opensea CEO. Sounds clicking email links was not the problem. So I guess it's still a mystery. I apologize for spreading the misinformation that we actually had some idea what happened.
If you don't understand any of this shit, don't use it. That's all I've been saying this whole time and people have been so mad at me. I honestly don't understand it.
What I've been told is I'm keeping people from changing their lives by suggesting that this stuff isn't trustworthy. I've been told I'm "irresponsible" because I'm not diving into the technical details and instead telling people none of this shit makes sense.
What I've been told is "that's just gone project. Don't judge all of them."

What I've been told is "most of this is trustworthy. There is clear education to tell you how to avoid the scams."
Here is the Opensea CTO. They don't know what happened yet. And here's the thing. They don't have to know. The nature of this tech is that Opensea doesn't own anything. You can interact with this ecosystem without going through "trusted" portals.
And then you get this. Some technical jargon that I assume is the "education" we keep getting promised. If you can decipher this tweet, you will know how to prevent all of your money being stolen. Good luck.
Obviously you gotta know what a Wyvern is Rob. That's just common sense.
I was called "irresponsible" today for trying to surface this information to people. Because I'm not making myself responsible for how hard it is to navigate through this bullshit. By someone who claims that they "respect" me. I can't tell you how upset that makes me.
People like to use the word "respect". It's their way of telling me that they're losing respect for me because I'm not buying into this mess. But when I tell them to leave me alone because I'm losing respect for them, then I'm being a bully. It feels like gaslighting.
If folks honestly respected me, because I've shown my judgment to be trustworthy in the past, that would suggest that my judgment should get more consideration here. But that's not what's happening. This isn't about "respect". Folks think I'm gonna stop their bag.
So let me make y'all feel better. I don't actually have the power to stop this crypto trend. The current atmosphere of discrediting and dismissing any critical voices is incredibly effective. My credibility as an "old school" technologist is actually gonna become a liability.
Only people who have been in the game are gonna listen to me. And we can all be written off as just "resistant to progress". People new to the game will assume this is normal. They are ripe for the picking. I hope this helps some folks sleep better at night. You're welcome.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marco Rogers

Marco Rogers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @polotek

Feb 17
Get into this thread. Seriously.

People think I'm being an asshole or "punching down" when I try to talk about this stuff. I'm not. I'm trying to help people be more prepared to navigate the world around them. Even as we try to change it for the better.
I keep asking people. Are we talking about the way it should be or the way it is? Both of those are important. But if you only ever wanna talk about the first thing, then the second thing is gonna fuck you up.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 17
People will not let go of objective “merit” as a baseline assumption for how people get promoted. No matter how many times you tell them that’s not how it works.
I understand why people *think* they want it to work that way. I also know that people don't *actually* want it to work that way. Because when you try to talk to individuals about their own “merit”, that shit gets wild real quick.
Folks only wanna talk about other people’s perceived “merit”. Meritocracy for thee, but not for me.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 17
Once you truly accept that there is no magic, a lot of things get more frustrating. Because you start to see all of the ways that the humans in the system make excuses for not changing it. Almost all of them. Even many of the ones who actually want it to change.
I don't know how to talk about this yet. I'm still searching for the right words, the right framework.

I spend a lot of time trying to convince individual people in the system what they should try to do differently in order to be part of change. But they won't do it.
I know it's hard to do these things. I certainly haven't worked up to doing all of the things I could be doing. But choosing to start trying is the first step. Instead people like to rail against the system while acting like their words and actions are not part of it.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 15
I wish I had more energy to talk about this tonight. There are a lot of questions to ask.
I assume a lot of people are going to react like this. It's understandable.
But what Breslow is describing is a very real problem in the tech startup ecosystem. And we have to pay attention. Because this particular mechanism is at the core of whether employees get to participate in the wealth that is generated by this industry.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 12
The real hack for fewer meetings is to lean into them and make sure the reason you were invited actually happens. A lot of meetings are tedious because they're repeats. The last time you met, the thing that needed to happen didn't happen.
Dan's answer is 100% legit. All meetings aren't terrible. *Other* people's meetings are terrible. When you need something from somebody else, a meeting is just you doing your job. We can all do our part by helping other people's meetings be successful.
In a lot of corporate work environments. It's not always obvious *what* we need from each other. People call meetings to try to figure out what they need. It can feel wasteful, but there's actually no good way around it. Figuring out why we're meeting is a superpower.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 8
Some choice quotes from the article:

"When the hack occurred, the bitcoin was worth approximately $71 million. Today, it would be worth $4.5 billion, they said."

The level of speculation that has occurred around Bitcoin is wild.
"Prosecutors said they would ultimately move to return the seized money back to those it was stolen from in 2016."

Imagine getting $100 stolen from you and then 5 years later they return you $6500. That's more or less what this means.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(