Laura Helmuth Profile picture
Feb 21 14 tweets 2 min read
Headlines are the most important three to 12 words in any story. Here's where they come from, in case anybody's interested, and some observations about recent trends and misunderstandings (thread)
The writer or videographer or graphic artist (the person whose name, or byline, is at the top of the piece) usually doesn't write the headline. The editor (whose name is probably not on the piece) usually writes the headline.
The same story can have different headlines depending on where you're seeing it. Print headlines have to fit a physical layout with images and other display copy (words that aren't part of the story, like subheadlines or captions)
Online headlines have two audiences: people and search bots. A joke headline might attract people and encourage them to share it. But a search bot might not register what the story is really about. Ideally online headline will be clear enough for a bot and fun enough for people
The headline on a publication's homepage might be different again, and the URL might not match any of them. If they differ? It's not a conspiracy (as conspiracy theorists sometimes accuse me of). It's just audience or search or display optimization.
Sometimes we "A/B Test" which of two or three headlines is most effective. For instance, we can randomly show a person who goes to a website one headline or another, and see which headline gets the most people to click.
Important clarification: It's not just the click that matters. It's "quality clicks," or whether someone opens a piece and then sticks around, an indication that the headline promised what they were looking for. If someone clicks away immediately, that's a sign of "clickbait"
Clickbait doesn't mean a headline is something you want to click on. That's just a good headline on a good story! Clickbait means the story doesn't fulfill the promise of the headline, which irritates everybody and is something (good) headline writers don't want
One of the trends I've noticed (and used) a lot in headline writing, especially during the pandemic, is the construction: "Here's What We Know So Far." It's such a genuine and honest promise of a headline ...
From early in the pandemic, we had headlines like "Is the Coronavirus Airborne? Here's What We Know so Far." "What Kind of Mask Should I Wear? Here's What We Know so Far" etc. It indicates 3 things: here's the latest info; not everything is known yet; we'll update you again later
Number headlines have been popular for about as long as there have been magazines. If a headline promises "17 Tips for Writing Great Headlines" and you can think of only 6, of course you want to read about the others. And a number implies the story will be easy & fun to read
Superlatives (biggest, farthest, fastest, oldest) tend to attract people.
You don't have to tell the whole story in the headline, and when in doubt, highlight the most interesting part.
Writing headlines is a lot of fun. If you're writing something, please feel free to suggest headlines when you pitch or file a story. Editors, start a brainstorming group for headlines if you don't have one. Or test them out here on Twitter so we can all help! /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laura Helmuth

Laura Helmuth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @laurahelmuth

Feb 20
Looking forward to the @AAASmeetings plenary on problems in science communication, with @hholdenthorp @JaneLubchenco @AstroKatie @DrJoSimps & Kathleen Hall Jamieson aaas.confex.com/aaas/2022/meet…
There's been a shift in science in past 25 years toward more engagement & communication & solutions -- @JaneLubchenco
But when she & other scientists talked to Newt Gingrich about climate change, he wanted to know which policies he could champion that were different from That Al Gore Thing.
Read 26 tweets
Feb 20
This year's @AAASmeetings has had some great sessions on misinformation, and I'm looking forward to this one starting at 11 ET aaas.confex.com/aaas/2022/meet…
Research by @lkfazio shows that repeating false claims makes people more likely to believe them, even if the false claims contradict knowledge people had before they saw the misinformation
Is there a link between "epistemic motivation" and misinfo? Yep, according to research by @dannagal. Trump supporters are more likely to say they value intuition and emotion as a way to get to truth, and to endorse false info. They're not as swayed by data & evidence.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 19
Great talk at @AAASmeetings by @katestarbird about participatory disinformation and how quickly Trump-fan grievances on social media amplify conspiracy theories aaas.confex.com/aaas/2022/meet…
"some of us are trying to understand how to put a wrench in this system and stop the madness"
Platform policies around health and election misinformation have made a difference -- suspensions on Twitter took out accounts spreading misinformation and linked to astroturfing and QAnon (didn't get it all, though)
Read 7 tweets
Nov 18, 2021
Substack seems to be attracting a certain set of writers who are arrogant, self-righteous, offended by social justice efforts, and/or just looking for a fight. This thread is about one small part of this pattern: editing, and what contempt for editing says about someone (1/x)
Substack is a platform that lets writers publish what they want, unedited. I get the attraction. It can be painful to hear from an editor that, say, your introduction takes too long to get to the point or your metaphor doesn’t track or your logic has holes in it (2/x)
A good editor identifies the parts that are confusing or unsupported or insensitive and helps fix them. Sure, there are bad editors, but in most cases writers and editors can reach an agreement about structure and language that works well for the editor’s publication (3/x)
Read 8 tweets
Oct 24, 2021
One of the many invisible good deeds people deserve more credit for is not kicking down, especially on Twitter, even when it’s tempting. I recently got kicked at by someone with 11x more followers than me, let’s call him Yatt Mglasias. <thread>
I tweeted out a lovely story by some desert ecologists about how movies often present deserts as wastelands, but they’re actually really interesting and rich. The story was pegged to Dune, and my tweet (I realized belatedly) could be read to mean that I didn't understand Dune.
I got dunked on by a few people who hadn’t read the article. Then Yatt tweeted a snide tweet to his half-million followers. Predictably, legions of Yatt fans are now sending me elaborate, misogynistic messages about how stupid I am.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 30, 2021
One of the biggest barriers to progress is the fact that most of the people who have succeeded in a given field and have the power to change things think the system works ~just~ ~fine~ the way it is. 1/x
You help run a medical school and you had to spend years of your training sleep deprived? Well, so should new trainees. 2/x
Your have won an award and now your organization wants to change the contributions it recognizes with its awards? Nonsense. The awards recognize the exact right types of accomplishments! 3/x
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(