THREAD on Ukraine's 20th century history in a global context. This can help understand current events. -- 1) one of possible lenses to look at 20th century history is to see it as struggle between various phantasies to build continental empires. Primarily German and Russian
2) Early 20th century "geopolitics" (Mackinder, Haushofer et al) was obsessed with an idea of Eurasia. Who controls Eurasia, controls the world, it believed. Who controls Eastern Europe, controls Eurasia.
3) Continental empires saw themselves as competitors to the 19th century maritime empires (Britain, France etc) and were dreaming on vast new geopolitical projects which would challenge domination of these maritime empires
4) Eastern Europe (including Ukraine) was seen as a major battlefield between Germanic and Russian geopolitical fantasies. This is why Germans came to Ukraine in 1918 to get food, and why Hitler's "Lebensraum" meant Eastern Europe, including Ukraine
5) Collapse of Habsburg empire after WWI and of 3rd Reich after WWII put an end to the Germanic continental imperialism. But Russian empire restored itself after WWI as Soviet Union, strengthened after WWII, and regained its strength even after collapse of the Soviet Union
6) this means that Russia remains the only empire in Europe which still lives according to 19th and early 20th century imperial geopolitical phantasy. In this lenses, controling Eastern Europe (or maybe Central and Eastern Europe) leads to control over Eurasia.
7) Without this control over Eastern Europe Russia perceives itself as Asia, not Eurasia. And Russians don't want to be "Asia". Anschluss of Belarus brings this "Eurasian" dream closer. Ukraine remains a key obstacle.
8) we can consider all these ideas obsolete, insane, archaic (they are) but it doesn't make them less influential. This is how Putin perceives the reality. these are the sources of his perverse logic
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
a thread to understand what's going on: think of Russia as postmodern fascist state, a mix of Mussolini and Baudrillard. This means: a) there's no society or individuals, only state, which subjugates all, b) there's no reality, only virtual image which subjugates facts
Kremlin's key enemy is the reality itself. It tries to be ahead of reality and playing with the reality as if it is a computer game - with only difference that they play with real people and their lives and destinies
they use "evacuation of orphans" to get an virtual image of a horrible aggressive Ukraine. They deport people to get an image of "refugees" who flee. They make "terrorist acts" against their own hostages and invite their "media" to get an image of Ukrainian attack.
Thread on Russian colonialism. 1. It is different from maritime colonialism of European empires. In the latter, the colonized were substantially different from colonizers. In the Russian colonialism of East. Europe the colonized were often NOT too different from the colonizer
2. Maritime empires constructed an image of the "otherness" of the colonized. Russian continental empire constructed an idea of the "sameness" of the colonized. This legitimized politics of assimilation
3. The politics of assimilation suggested that the colonized are inferior beings, but they have a chance to become true humans if they reject their identity (linguistic, cultural, ethnic, religious). You could join the ruling nation / ruling class through amnesia