Chelsea are a pressing team but they're pinned back more easily than Liverpool and City are. Their settled pressing from goal kicks is good because the wingbacks push on & press high, but it's hard for them to do that in settled play unless it's a defensive overload on the side.
In settled midfield moments where the ball is central & the play is circulated to the fullback, it's often difficult for Chelsea's wingbacks to push that high up the pitch. If they do, the winger is free & the centre back has to come across, but that's a lot of distance to cover. 
Lille have more of the ball away at Stamford Bridge & they're 11th in Ligue 1. It's not a good indication of control for a pressing team. On average, Chelsea have 4.2% less of the ball than Liverpool & nearly 10% less than City - they simply don't press as well as those two.
Then, when the game wanes on like it has now & Chelsea have been regularly pinned back, the wingbacks struggle even more to get out to the fullbacks when attempting to press the play. Chelsea's front 3 get passed around too easily in central areas - the fullback is free regularly
It's why City pin Chelsea back for the entirety of the game whereas Liverpool can actually keep the ball against them. Chelsea's settled press is passive and they lack number in the front line of pressing within settled midfield play. Liverpool don't - they have 6 as opposed to 5
Liverpool have also got that hellbent pressing mentality and offside trap they play to relentlessly keep on pressing. It is a very specific critique of Chelsea because their general settled press is good, but just not in this specific settled midfield play scenario.
I think this flaw is so damning to the point where Chelsea will never win the league under Tuchel unless he changes system or the league dampens in terms of quality. It's nowhere near as bad as a typical non-pressing team issue, but it's still a big one over a league season.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
