Many here on Twitter have been piecing together the evidence that the entire Trump Russia collusion narrative was a fabrication of the Hillary Clinton campaign from the very beginning. This video of Robbie Mook on July 24, 2016, puts it all in perspective. He cites “experts” who
already, as of July 24, concluded that Russia hacked the DNC and then released emails- to help Donald Trump become president. He goes on to say that these unknown “experts” also point to the Republican convention’s amendment of the platform to go soft on the US commitment to
defending Ukraine against Russia. Here’s the video:
The major takeaway from this is that the first “expert” who tied the Russian hack of the DNC and the Republican platform to an express or implicit cooperation between Russia and Trump’s campaign was Christopher Steele. His Dossier Memo #95, falsely attributed by Danchenko to
Sergei Millian, describes for the first time the cooperation and conspiracy between Trump and Russia, the Russian hack as being designed to help Trump, and the soft-on-Russia Republican platform- just as Mook described on July 24. The problem is that Steele didn’t release #95 to
Glenn Simpson, and the FBI didn’t get it until September 19. It’s undated. So Mook’s interview raises an intriguing questions: Did Hillary and her campaign get #95 or it’s content on or before July 24? Or did Hillary and her campaign feed their paid “expert” Christopher Steele
and his source network with the fabricated Trump Russia collusion narrative described in #95? And if so, when Steele wrote what he was told to include in #95, did Steele task Danchenko with finding a phony source (who turned out to be Millian) to pin the bombshell information on?
I suspect Durham knows the answers to these questions, as he’s laid out the outlines of a conspiracy case involving members of the Clinton campaign. This suspicious timing by Mook of announcing the campaign knows of some “experts” who have already pieced together the Trump Russia
collusion narrative will no doubt play an important role in any conspiracy case Durham decides to bring.
And one other point. The FBI’s FISA warrant application against Carter Page lifts language verbatim from #95, in support of the assertion that there was an agreement to cooperate between Trump and Russia. That was essential to the probable cause that Page was a Russian agent.
Mook’s interview shows how clued in the campaign was to these false charges that originally came from an “expert” paid for by the Clinton campaign.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kingmaker - Big IF! (True)

Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KingMakerFT

Feb 23
Check out this thread by @ProfMJCleveland and her article in The Federalist, linked in the thread. She discusses the gathering and analysis of everyone’s internet data by a select, secretive group of scientists, law enforcement, researchers-a group that you and I, mere mortals,
can’t join and can’t be told what these people are up to. One is apparently Rodney Joffe, who used his access to the data collected and mined by this select group to try to frame Donald Trump. Here’s @ProfMJCleveland ‘s thread:
The mystery group she writes about is called Ops-Trust. Ever heard of it? Me neither. Here’s the article: thefederalist.com/2022/02/23/let…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 23
A few days ago the Washington Post’s official Fact Checker, @GlennKesslerWP , published an analysis with the headline “How the Right Embraced the False Claim that Hillary Clinton ‘Spied’ on President Donald Trump.” Mr Kessler explained, correctly, that Durham’s latest filing
didn’t really say Hillary SPIEF, and according to Michael Sussmann’s lawyers, the data Sussmann brought to the CIA in February 2016 was collected when Obama was president. In other words, someone, maybe not Hillary. was targeting Trump and his associates as they were in or near
the White House or other executive offices forming part of the Executive Office of the President (EOP). So when would that have been? Since the DNS data presented by Sussmann to the CIA could be associated with Trump or his associates, and since it also originated in or in the
Read 13 tweets
Feb 19
There’s an April 2020 article in the Washington Examiner that’s worth another read in light of recent filings by Durham regarding he direction his case against Sussmann is going. The article picks up testimony given in the UK by Christopher Steele about how he first learned
of Alfa Bank -Trump Org connection. Hint: It didn’t come from Danchenko or any of Steele’s source network. Rather, Steele learned of it at the July 29, 2016, meeting at Perkins Coie, attended by Sussmann, Elias, Steele, Simpson, Fritsch (from Fusion GPS),and perhaps Joffe. Steele
testified that Sussmann was the source, and that after the meeting, Simpson tasked Steele with doing research on Alfa Bank’s ties to Putin and to write up the Trump-Alfa story as part of the dossier. Which Steele did, although he testified that Sussmann carried the narrative to
Read 10 tweets
Feb 17
One thing that jumped out at me from Sussmann’s motion to dismiss is that the theory of dismissal is premised on the assumption that the FBI had but one decision on the table when Sussmann lied about who is client was: The FBI had to decide whether to investigate the Alfa
-Trump Org alleged communications. Nothing about the context of this news, which was the ongoing , broader CH investigation. The Alfa story, if true, would clearly have become an important, even an integral part of the entire Russian interference investigation. I’ll have to give
some thought to materiality in that context, and whether it’s likely Durham will go into greater detail than he has so far into the underlying merits- was CH ever a legit investigation, and if so, was it still legit when Sussmann brought the Alfa Bank narrative to the FBI?
Read 5 tweets
Feb 17
I think it’s helpful to read three articles, all out yesterday and today , that relate to the question @HansMahncke poses here:
The articles are this by Paul Sperry, realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/…
This by J.E. Dyer, describing how it’s possible to use targeted DNS data to short cut FISA 702 queries without giving up the game that the IC agent making the query is really targeting Americans: …eoptimisticconservative.wordpress.com/2022/02/16/and…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 17
This latest piece by J.E. Dyer (@OptimisticCon ) raises something nobody has yet put together. Dyer takes Durham’s latest filing and reads it side by side with what Devin Nunes told us he saw in the spring of 2017 when he reviewed classified documents describing the irregular
capture of electronic communications by US citizens and their unmasking. Nunes claimed this evidence of spying or surveillance was mind blowing. It fit with what later came out in the FISA court’s opinion describing abuses of 702 by FBI contractors. Dyer makes the case that the
massive DNS data gathering undertaken by Neustar and other govt contractors could have been used to engage in “surveillance melding” (his term), whereby DNS hits associated with certain Trump associates could be used to “cue” 702 database queries, so as to avoid using banned
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(