Only date when pro-Ban side trended was in the aftermath of US International Religious Freedom Ambassador's tweet on the matter, which was followed by a flood of NIMBY messaging. This also happened after @Malala Yousafzai's message.
Almost 70% of the most engaged tweets are pro-ban, but anti-ban tweets are about 500% more in volume than pro-ban tweets This suggests a high degree of mobilization was done through a smaller number of tweets. This is a typical pattern seen in cases of astroturfing.
Very few highly followed politicians engaged the issue ex. Gandhis, Tharoor, Asad Owaisi and a few others.
High-ranking BJP leaders also steered clear of the issue. Leaders with Twitter cache but electoral insignificance such as Subramanian Swamy and Kapil Mishra were among the few to engage in pro Hijab-ban messaging.
While AIMIM took a direct stance defending the right to Hijab, other parties that rely on secular posturing including Samajwadi Party, Trinamool Congress, and Nationalist Congress Party were all silent on the issue.
For the most part, the majority of anti-ban messaging came from Muslims, Hindu allies either kept out of it, or were not central to the drivers of the conversation. A look at a wordcloud of who else those talking about the Hijab ban on both sides clearly tells this story.
Exclusion of Hijab from other religious markers, particularly Sikh Turbans, was a pro-Hijab ban trope. This could be seen through the prism of avoiding alienating Sikhs in the middle of a state election, it could also be argued that the general stance is just to other Muslims.
This is work by @actuallysoham and @anmolpanda_ A link to the paper and methodological details with curating and studying the tweets is available here:
It is more valuable for influencers to promote the BJP than it is to promote the opposition. Using data from X, we find overall that influencers who put out content that is more popular within opposition circles started messaging less over time.
A thread on our recent paper 🧵
We use a concept of 'Sprial of Silence' from social theory to describe this phenomenon:
People whose point of view differs from what they perceive as the dominant position slowly stop putting out their opinions in public. Here's a summary of Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann's theory.
In a nutshell, many mainstream celebrities & public figures made anti-BJP messages in the past, but that slowed down over time.
Eventually, digital influencers who don't have consequence outside of online spaces are the only ones left commenting on political issues.
There are changes coming to the news media ecology in India.
Mainstream media with camera crews & newsrooms is being eaten up by @YouTube based political content operating with selfie sticks, and often political patronage.
🧵 on our work on political interviewing on @YouTube
Digital influencers, breakaway journalists who start their own channels and digital news channels with minimal budgets are able to produce content that is consumed at higher levels than what mainstream media houses do, especially when it comes to political interviews.
While @TheLallantop leads views for political interviews among digital news channels, @CurlyTalesIndia @UFbySamdishh @rajshamani all outperform mainstream media on interview views on their @YouTube channels.
But on @ravishndtv - even minor politicians outperform cabinet rankers
Politicians are choosing to be interviewed by YouTubers instead of journalists. This will change the face of political interviewing in the 2024 elections and undermine professional journalism during the campaign cycle
We examined channels of five high-influence YouTubers @TechnicalGuruji @CurlyTalesIndia @BeerBicepsGuy @ElvishYadav @DrVivekBindra
All are more followed than most Indian news channels.
All the interviews were non-confrontational, with little serious policy examination.
These Influencers are known either for domain specialties - food & travel @CurlyTalesIndia, technology @TechnicalGuruji, business leadership @DrVivekBindra or for their style of engagement such as earthy comedy @ElvishYadav or contemporary lifestyle conversations @BeerBicepsGuy
Full papers & recordings of all talks at "Social Media and Society in India" covering topics from caste, gender, and hate speech to travel, activism, and online financial advice in India from influencers, academics, industry practitioners now public:
Supreme Court advocate @karunanundy spoke about social media and the law, addressing the notion of constructed virality and the spread of disinformation, particularly by men’s rights associations.
A link to her full talk:
Editor @KotwalMeena , founder of @The_Mooknayak discusses the need for caste diversity in the newsroom, and how social media impacts the coverage of issues faced by the most marginalized people in India:
There is a large scale, organized attack against DY Chandrachud on social media, presenting him as an internal enemy, a foreign agent, and a threat to democracy.
We examined Twitter activity to seek out the drivers of this attack, and the narratives these help build.
Chandrachud (and the collegium) are presented as a danger to democracy.
This reminds followers that even if opposition is neutered, there are challenges to the nation to fear.
This notion of the CJI as part of a liberal/globalist perpetual threat is an important trope,
While CJI’s judgments and positions are presented as an immediate threat leading into 2024 which his tenure extends to, the attacks are more aimed at unseen enemies.
Threat is most effective when it is also cultural alongside political.
When Devika Rani was sent to England, she lived at the home of a family friend Niranjan Pal and his wife Lily Bell, a rare multi-racial couple in the 1920s, at their home in Paddington.
Pal was a playwright who had kickstarted Rai's career - Rai initially planned to become a lawyer, but in 1922 was introduced to Pal, and became part of his production of "Goddess" on London's theatre distrct