joyojeet pal Profile picture
Feb 24, 2022 14 tweets 6 min read Read on X
We examined Twitter messaging related to the Hijab Ban.

TL;DR

Most engagement is anti-Ban, but loudest influencers are pro-Ban

Most people with opinions on the issue are male

Most major politicians, incl those claiming secular credentials, dodged the issue, ex Gandhis

1/n
The most engaged accounts are influencers on the right who lean pro-ban. However, the overall Twitter engagement is 5x higher on the anti-ban side.

This suggests an influencer-driven strategy for the pro-ban side.
Second, we see the timeline of engagement. The first peak was the Bhandarkar/Hegde college incidents & Rahul Gandhi's tweet.

The biggest spikes in Twitter activity come after the surrounding of the Hijab-wearing girls by classmates, and the Muskan Khan defiance incident.
We see that most trending anti-ban hashtags were countered with pro-ban hashtags in an organized fashion.

Thus #HijabIsIndividualRight followed by #YesToUniform_NoToHijab and #EducationIsMyRight is almost immediately followed by #HijaabNahinKitaabDo
Only date when pro-Ban side trended was in the aftermath of US International Religious Freedom Ambassador's tweet on the matter, which was followed by a flood of NIMBY messaging. This also happened after @Malala Yousafzai's message.
Almost 70% of the most engaged tweets are pro-ban, but anti-ban tweets are about 500% more in volume than pro-ban tweets This suggests a high degree of mobilization was done through a smaller number of tweets. This is a typical pattern seen in cases of astroturfing.
Very few highly followed politicians engaged the issue ex. Gandhis, Tharoor, Asad Owaisi and a few others.

While @priyankagandhi did directly address the matter, she added the INC UP clarion call #LadkiHoonLadSaktiHoon

High-ranking BJP leaders also steered clear of the issue. Leaders with Twitter cache but electoral insignificance such as Subramanian Swamy and Kapil Mishra were among the few to engage in pro Hijab-ban messaging.
While AIMIM took a direct stance defending the right to Hijab, other parties that rely on secular posturing including Samajwadi Party, Trinamool Congress, and Nationalist Congress Party were all silent on the issue.
For the most part, the majority of anti-ban messaging came from Muslims, Hindu allies either kept out of it, or were not central to the drivers of the conversation. A look at a wordcloud of who else those talking about the Hijab ban on both sides clearly tells this story.
Exclusion of Hijab from other religious markers, particularly Sikh Turbans, was a pro-Hijab ban trope. This could be seen through the prism of avoiding alienating Sikhs in the middle of a state election, it could also be argued that the general stance is just to other Muslims.
This is work by @actuallysoham and @anmolpanda_ A link to the paper and methodological details with curating and studying the tweets is available here:

joyojeet.people.si.umich.edu/hijab/
Here is a visualization of an extended list of influencers who tweeted on this issue.
Here is a visualization of an extended list of politicians who tweeted on this issue.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with joyojeet pal

joyojeet pal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joyopal

Aug 25
It is more valuable for influencers to promote the BJP than it is to promote the opposition. Using data from X, we find overall that influencers who put out content that is more popular within opposition circles started messaging less over time.

A thread on our recent paper 🧵 Image
We use a concept of 'Sprial of Silence' from social theory to describe this phenomenon:

People whose point of view differs from what they perceive as the dominant position slowly stop putting out their opinions in public. Here's a summary of Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann's theory. Image
In a nutshell, many mainstream celebrities & public figures made anti-BJP messages in the past, but that slowed down over time.

Eventually, digital influencers who don't have consequence outside of online spaces are the only ones left commenting on political issues.
Read 15 tweets
May 22
There are changes coming to the news media ecology in India.

Mainstream media with camera crews & newsrooms is being eaten up by @YouTube based political content operating with selfie sticks, and often political patronage.

🧵 on our work on political interviewing on @YouTube https://joyojeet.people.si.umich.edu/wp-admin/post.php?post=1426
Digital influencers, breakaway journalists who start their own channels and digital news channels with minimal budgets are able to produce content that is consumed at higher levels than what mainstream media houses do, especially when it comes to political interviews. Graphic visualization of the most viewed channels on political interviewing in India.
While @TheLallantop leads views for political interviews among digital news channels, @CurlyTalesIndia @UFbySamdishh @rajshamani all outperform mainstream media on interview views on their @YouTube channels.

But on @ravishndtv - even minor politicians outperform cabinet rankers
Read 17 tweets
Jan 28
Politicians are choosing to be interviewed by YouTubers instead of journalists. This will change the face of political interviewing in the 2024 elections and undermine professional journalism during the campaign cycle

A thread, & link to the research
joyojeet.people.si.umich.edu/?p=1375
Image
We examined channels of five high-influence YouTubers @TechnicalGuruji @CurlyTalesIndia @BeerBicepsGuy @ElvishYadav @DrVivekBindra

All are more followed than most Indian news channels.

All the interviews were non-confrontational, with little serious policy examination.
These Influencers are known either for domain specialties - food & travel @CurlyTalesIndia, technology @TechnicalGuruji, business leadership @DrVivekBindra or for their style of engagement such as earthy comedy @ElvishYadav or contemporary lifestyle conversations @BeerBicepsGuy Image
Read 19 tweets
Jul 23, 2023
Full papers & recordings of all talks at "Social Media and Society in India" covering topics from caste, gender, and hate speech to travel, activism, and online financial advice in India from influencers, academics, industry practitioners now public:

🧵

https://t.co/qmBOsP7KiKjoyojeet.people.si.umich.edu/influencers.htm
Image
Supreme Court advocate @karunanundy spoke about social media and the law, addressing the notion of constructed virality and the spread of disinformation, particularly by men’s rights associations.

A link to her full talk:
Editor @KotwalMeena , founder of @The_Mooknayak discusses the need for caste diversity in the newsroom, and how social media impacts the coverage of issues faced by the most marginalized people in India:

A link to her full talk:

Read 42 tweets
May 30, 2023
There is a large scale, organized attack against DY Chandrachud on social media, presenting him as an internal enemy, a foreign agent, and a threat to democracy.

We examined Twitter activity to seek out the drivers of this attack, and the narratives these help build. Image
Chandrachud (and the collegium) are presented as a danger to democracy.

This reminds followers that even if opposition is neutered, there are challenges to the nation to fear.

This notion of the CJI as part of a liberal/globalist perpetual threat is an important trope, Image
While CJI’s judgments and positions are presented as an immediate threat leading into 2024 which his tenure extends to, the attacks are more aimed at unseen enemies.

Threat is most effective when it is also cultural alongside political. ImageImage
Read 31 tweets
May 9, 2023
The drama series #jubilee based on Bombay Talkies has an interesting connection to Savarkar and Sri Aurobindo (if you stretch it, to Gandhi and Modi)

Besides Himansu Rai and Devika Rani, there is a less known but bizarre story of a third founder of the studio, Niranjan Pal.

🧵
When Devika Rani was sent to England, she lived at the home of a family friend Niranjan Pal and his wife Lily Bell, a rare multi-racial couple in the 1920s, at their home in Paddington.
Pal was a playwright who had kickstarted Rai's career - Rai initially planned to become a lawyer, but in 1922 was introduced to Pal, and became part of his production of "Goddess" on London's theatre distrct
Read 66 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(