So something interesting that could be developing at the UN: Ukraine appears to be laying the groundwork to challenge whether the Russian Federation is the legitimate successor to the USSR’s seat and veto on the Security Council
Here’s the ambassador citing the part of the charter that deals with admission of members during his speech at the UN Security Council earlier tonight
And here’s his demand for the documents that show that the Russian Federation was welcomed to the body by the UNSC and General Assembly. Those documents don’t exist as he noted because the UN legal counsel made the call
The UN Charter was never amended after the USSR broke up. It still references the Soviet Union as one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council. The Russian Federation just ascended to that seat after 1991.
So as @p_orchard noted the only other example of a member joining outside the usual method was when the PRC took over China’s seat from the Nationalist government in Taiwan. They did so via a UNGA resolution, which the US was uh not happy about
So that could (maybe??) be Ukraine’s goal? To have the UNGA pass a resolution declaring that either the USSR’s seat is empty or that some other state should be the -real- successor to the Soviet’s
Do I think it would work? Hell if I know but it’s fascinating and will be wild to see how it develops. Especially since it took IIRC ten years for the PRC’s supporters to overcome US opposition and procedural delays in the UNGA.
From 1961 - 1971, the US made sure the question of the China seat at the UNGA was an “important question” that required a two-thirds vote. It’s possible that Russia try a similar tactic, but will they have support for raising the bar in the first place? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Okay, everyone, stop retweeting this thread and start retweeting this article which goes more in-depth please and thank you
That includes posting the full "Bill of Rights" of things parents should get to know, including a list of EVERY BOOK in the school library and "if a school employee or contractor acts to change a minor child’s gender markers, pronouns or preferred name.”
Remember the right-wing backlash to the DOJ being like "hey, maybe don't threaten school boards or teachers"? That's why school boards would HAVE to allow parents to address them about...things. Very important things.
The one (1) downside to a super protracted speaker fight is that committee staff might lose out on pay if things don’t get sorted politico.com/news/2022/12/2…
“There are presently divisions within the House GOP caucus, between Republicans in the House and Senate, and even inside the normally staid Senate GOP caucus” msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-…
ugh I know that the General Hellscape is bad but I have learned so much from the very smart people on this stupid website?? the jokes are fun, the career boosting insanely useful, but it was the experts and academics actually engaging on here that really locked me in here
[rocks in rocking chair] yessir I remember the days of the early to mid-aughts. 1000 followers was a huge audience. place was big enough to seek out new ideas, small enough to actually converse and debate with strangers. no native retweets, you had to parse that sucker by hand.
in my day, all the pictures were hosted on a frog. for fun we’d sit around tradin puns based on a hashtag. we would livetweet any fool thing that passed before our eyes. we had trolls, oh my yes, but they still understood how to feel shame.