thread 1/13 Putin's risk appetite is far greater than we realised. We are deluding ourselves (I was too complacent and thought he wouldn't go this far) So forget the stirring talk about Western unity and a revived spirit of purpose in NATO.
2/13 Warm words and high spirits do not bring the dead back to life. As you read this, Ukrainians are huddling in bomb shelters, dodging bullets, and seeing their dreams of a free, prosperous, law-governed independent country destroyed.
3/13 For the West, this may be (yet another) wake-up call. For Ukraine, it is a death-knell.We will have years (decades, probably) to mull the combination of naivete, complacency, arrogance, ignorance and — most of all — greed that brought us to this catastrophe.
4/13 But the biggest question is what to do right now. Sanctions are not a magic bullet. But here is a ten-point to-do list for action by the end of the week. (lots of other things too, but this for immediate action)
5/13 -- Withdraw all Western (NATO, EU, OECD) ambassadors from Moscow and send their Russian counterparts home.
-- Close all Russian consulates, trade missions. We need barebones embassies, nothing more.
6/13 --. Remove RT and other Russian propaganda organs from the airwaves in all countries that have regulated broadcast media.
7/13 -- visa bans on all government ministers, on all members of the Duma and Federation Council, all governors and office-holders in Russia’s regions, on all officials in the “power ministries” and security agencies, and on the 35 individuals named in Alexei Navalny’s list.
8/13 -- And on their spouses, siblings, offspring, parents and other associates.
-- Announce a sweeping program of asset freezes on these individuals, and on companies linked to the Kremlin or owned (even in part) by Kremlin cronies.
9/13 -- Delist these companies from the exchanges in London, Frankfurt, New York and other western financial centers. Stop trading their debt, bonds and other financial instruments
10/13 -- The US to announce that foreign politicians and senior officials who sit on Russian boards or act as consultants to Russian companies must resign at once, or be blacklisted from visiting the United States. Other countries to follow suit.
11/13 -- Any law firm, bank, accountancy firm, consulting outfit or other professional service firm that does business with a sanctioned Russian entity must cut ties at once or face similar penalties.
12/13Announce snap military exercises in the Baltic Sea and Black Sea regions.
13/13 And finally:
Apologise to Ukrainians, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Poles, Czechs, Slovaks (and Russians) for ignoring their warnings over so many years.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More than 2 million people have signed the @Justice4Ukr petition calling for a Special international Tribunal to prosecute Russia’s crime of aggression. I encourage you all to add your name and share it with #SpecialTribunalNow.
A 🧵 on why this matters. justice-for-ukraine.com
———
While you read these words, unimaginable horrors continue to unfold for over 40 million men, women, and children in Ukraine - from the Russian bombardment of families in their homes to the widespread killing, rape, torture, and deportation in Russian occupied territory.
These are all crimes. But there is one single crime that enabled them all. Because it was the choice of individuals in Russia to wage this brutal and unprovoked war of aggression against them. Individuals who must face justice for that decision.
brilliant by @OliverBullough in his latest newsletter on the new Register of Overseas Entities,
1. For decades, oligarchs and others bought U.K. properties via used anonymous offshore companies to hide their identities.
2. David Cameron, when he was prime minister, promised to do something about this as part of an anti-corruption drive.
3. Cameron lost the Brexit referendum, and no one else in power was interested in driving out oligarchs, so they all accidentally on purpose kind of forgot all about it.
4. Russia attacked Ukraine last February and the British government wanted to do something about oligarchs.
@ajwsmall@JEyal_RUSI 1/x @owenmatth book chief point is that China doesn't like the war, and isn't helping Russia much. That chimes with what we know . However, as I point out in my article, there are other reasons (chiefly sanctions) for that.
@ajwsmall@JEyal_RUSI@owenmatth 2/x But the US flipflop on MiGs was mystifying. China could well have said that this would mean they supplied more ammo or other things to Russia. So the book's claim is a plausible explanation
.
@ajwsmall@JEyal_RUSI@owenmatth 3/x we know China's nuclear doctrine is narrow and purist. Deterrence only. CCP doesn't want to change that, dislikes Russia nuclear sabre-rattling. Diplomatic pressure on Kremlin regarding that v plausible
Look at the measures that the government has announced.
Here’s a quick guide
2/11 One of the most influential Russian banks, VTB, faces a full asset freeze in the UK. Russian banks can no longer use sterling, or the British financial system, to make payments.
Verdict: this will inconvenience Russian bankers. They will find ways round it.
3/11 Russian private companies will be banned from raising funds, taking loans on London financial markets.
Verdict – annoying for them, not so much for the Kremlin. If Putin cared about Russian economy he would not be fighting a war
Thread: 1/5 Putin has done a classic bait and switch: frightened us with one thing so that we accept another. The further dismemberment of Ukraine, and an avowed Russian military presence there: in effect, two more Crimeas.
2/5 We should have started sanctions months ago (years, really). Instead we have waited for a "trigger" event. Putin just has to calibrate his behaviour to be complicated (Donetsk Shmonetsk -- who's heard of these places anyway)? and sub-threshold.
3/5 Putin calculates (probably correctly) that the West will huff and puff but no more. if so, he walks away with a geopolitical trophy at minimal cost. (and don't forget other gains, ie Belarus). He's also exposed weakwilledness and disunity, and Ukraine's loneliness.
For anyone thinking that Ukraine would benefit from "finlandisation" here are a few quick correctives. 1) Finland did not enjoy or consent to being "finlandized" -- it was the result of Soviet military pressure.
2) Neutrality is no defence -- Russia attacked Ukraine when it was neutral. 3) Russia already promised to respect neutral Ukraine's sovereignty & borders in 1994 Budapest memorandum.
4) there was no footnote saying "unless you have a government we don't like". 5) why would similar promises be worth any more now? 6) Finland has close defence ties with a) Sweden b) NATO c) the United States