There must have been many moments over the last few weeks when Zelensky said to himself, "How the fuck did I get here?" As most of you know, Zelensky was a comedian and actor. Sort of a lark candidacy. I believe he actually owed a lot of his fame to a show in which ...
2/ he played a President of Ukraine. Not certain I remember that right but I think so. It seems almost unimaginable that he could have had any idea it would come to quite this. And yet now he's in a position in which he will either preside over the dissolution of the ...
3/ independent Ukrainian state or, if things go very differently, probably be regarded as something like a founding father of it. Through the last few weeks I've heard lots of commentary from public sources or just region experts in convo saying the guy is just hopelessly ...
4/ in over his head. And I don't know enough about the precise negotiations or internal Ukrainian state stuff to know whether that's true or not. But history often lives or dies in key, clutch moments. And I must say the recent speeches barreling into war ... they've shown ...
5/ a moral courage that is very hard to second guess. And let's be frank, there's something between a non-trivial and very good likelihood he will not physically survive this conflict. And yet, there he is. Not running. It's hard not to compare it - though the facts are ...
6/ very very different to the last President of Afghanistan, Ashraf Ghani, who got the fuck outta dodge at the first hint things were going south. Very very few of us will ever face a situation with such a combination of historic consequence and physical danger. But many of us...
7/ face moments where we must choose to face fear and live out our promises or run. And you have to say this guy is really passing that test. And though the resistance we're seeing is definitely one that involves millions of Ukrainians I have to imagine that a rapid collapse or..
8/ evacuation of state or its leadership would have been a gut punch to the morale we're seeing standing in defiance today.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Among so many other things this is an illustration of the importance of the presidential records act, which Donald Trump clearly violated repeatedly and flagrantly. This is a major international crisis. Whether it ends well or disastrously historians will be analyzing …
2/ for a very long time just how and why the key decisions were made. This isn’t just a matter of helping out future historians. The American people (and in a broader sense people in the future generally) have a right and a need to understand what happened. Now many of …
3/ the relevant records will be classified for a long time. But the president shouldn’t be destroying the records he doesn’t want people to see. Obviously no one else should destroy them either. This should be obvious. But this is why the PRA is important and why …
2/ others see this as preliminary to invasion. Recognize them and then accede to their request for troops. maybe. but looks more like something that allows him to shift gears without saying he lost.
3/ Realizing that many in this thread interpret off ramp here as meaning a deescalation or olive branch. That’s not my meaning at all. I think Putin underestimated the resilience of the Ukraine state and unity in NATO. Now it’s either invade or humiliating climb down.
I’m assembling a list of accounts to follow for news on the Ukraine Crisis. A focus on sources on ongoing developments over commentary, but some of that latter too. twitter.com/i/lists/149487…
2/ If you have accounts you think I should add let me know. A few points in how I assemble these. They’re not meant to be exhaustive. Someone not being on the list doesnt necessarily mean I don’t think they’re reliable or informative. Often it’s just that I don’t know about them.
3/ Also, sometimes I will leave someone off who I find very informative because they tweet abt a lot of things not relevant to the subject list. I try to keep the list fairly focused. I have also aimed this list more toward breaking developments than commentary …
As I've argued recently there were many good arguments, from a US perspective, against NATO enlargement in the 1990s. But in today's debates abt it and claims of broken 'deals', what seldom gets put front and center is a pretty obvious and simple point: Why were all these ...
2/ countries so eager to join NATO - Hungary, Poland, Romania, the Baltics, et al.? Yes, the US had its own Great Power interests in pushing and/or accepting it. It's not charity. But why is it that virtually every country either bordering or adjacent to Russia wanted to or ...
3/ want to join? As I said, I've generally been on the ambivalent/skeptic side of most NATO enlargement debates. The US has good reasons not to extend what are in real ways security commitments with existential implications to every country that might be or feel threatened ...
The Jerusalem Post just debuted 'Jerusalem Post Christian World' which it calls "portal ... where individuals can connect to the people, land and State of Israel through a Christian and biblical lens." I just checked it out and it's about as embarrassing as you'd imagine.
2/ So I stopped by the article and here are some of the feature stories.
2/ to elaborate on the point, I'm less strict about masking then I was before I was vaccinated. I was even less strict by late last year when prevalence was low and my individual risk of bad outcomes was low. I got stricter with Omicron. Now I'm backing off a bit again.
3/ What's less strict? I put on a mask whenever I'm in a public indoor space. Less strict is what I do in smallish private get togethers. I understand pulling back mask mandates in various states now. Good idea/bad idea? Not sure. But we have to balance impositions ...