Steven Mazie Profile picture
Feb 25 5 tweets 2 min read
BREAKING at SCOTUS: North Carolina Republicans file emergency application challenging NC state supreme court ruling against gerrymandered congressional map
The NC court found the map to violate the NC state constitution. Ordinarily that is the end of the story. But as @rickhasen suggested, this brazen run to SCOTUS is an attempt to nullify that ruling based on a view that state legislatures alone may determine how elections operate
It’s a long shot but not a gigantic stretch given what several justices have written. I teamed up with @tribelaw to explain the independent state legislature doctrine bostonglobe.com/2020/11/01/opi…
UPDATE: The court has called for a response by Wednesday, March 2 at 5 PM
The request will be docketed as 21A455

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steven Mazie

Steven Mazie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevenmazie

Feb 27
There’s a big messy case about the power of the EPA coming to SCOTUS on Monday that risks being overshadowed by the abortion, guns, voting rights, religion &c cases — but it’s v much worth your attention

(mini thread)
The case is West Virginia v. EPA. It regards the scope of the EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act.
It also might signal the Court’s view on how much latitude federal agencies in general have to issue regulations in the public interest — from regulating pesticides to issuing rules for workplace safety.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 24
NEW at SCOTUS: a 6-3 decision in Unicolors, Inc v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP—a fairly technical copyright case. Breyer writes for the majority; Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch dissent
And that's it for today.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 22
These may not be apposite in Elenis, as flowers, hairdos & photography do not involve what the 10th c saw as "pure speech" of website words & design. The question here is less messy—no "is cake speech?" It's flat-out whether certain views can exempt people from public-acc. laws.
To be clear: the 10th circuit ruled against the website designer EVEN THOUGH it acknowledged her work involves "pure speech".
That's because, Judge Briscoe found, Colorado's law passes strict scrutiny. It has a compelling interest in protecting LGBT people from discrimination in the marketplace.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 7
BREAKING AT SCOTUS: in a blow to voting rights, justices vote 5-4 to PERMIT Alabama to use a gerrymandered congressional map that dilutes voting influence of African Americans. A major victory for Republicans.
Chief Justice Roberts dissents, along with the three liberal justices.
Justice Kagan ends her dissent, joined by Breyer and Sotomayor, reiterating themes she has voiced before: the illegitimacy of resolving such crucial questions on the shadow docket, and the anti-democratic results of permitting racial gerrymanders.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 1
Lawyer up, every biology teacher everywhere
The “of students” part is pretty ambiguous. Is it only illegal to teach natural selection if you have creationist kids in your particular classroom? Do you need to poll your students at the beginning of the semester to find out what their religious beliefs are?
What if you have religious students whose fundamental tenet is “help the poor”? Is it illegal to teach Herbert Spencer?
Read 5 tweets
Jan 28
NEW at SCOTUS: Alabama files emergency application in race & redistricting dispute over new state's new congressional map.

As COVID-related litigation dissipates, this is likely the first of a wave of post-redistricting map-drawing disputes the justices will have to navigate. Image
First page. Will post full application in a minute. Image
Here's a copy of the document. It is not yet on the SCOTUS website but should be soon. drive.google.com/file/d/1Y-iwCq…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(