US State Department has come out in opposition to Zelenskyy and Putin meeting to discuss potential ceasefire. (!)
"Now we see Moscow suggesting that diplomacy take place at the barrel of a gun, or as Moscow’s rockets, mortars, artillery target the Ukrainian people."
Cities, including the Kiev capital, are under assault. US news media are reporting that Zelenskyy may face threat of assassination. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Ukrainians have fled. Talking with Putin could save Zelenskyy's life and stop the destruction in Ukraine.
US/NATO transformed Ukraine into proxy state and target for Russian assault, and yet their forces aren't parachuting in to push back Russian forces either. An insurgency could challenge Russia's troops, but it would take months if not longer for Ukrainians to prevail.
Of course, negotiations will take place at barrel of gun. Ukraine's military capabilities have been decimated. But some type of negotiations are only way peace has a chance. How many Ukrainian lives have to be sacrificed before US backs Zelenskyy in his desire to save Ukraine?
The deal that comes out of negotiations would be lopsided. It will favor Putin. However, it is even more clear that the US/NATO agenda is unrealistic and imperils the stability of eastern Europe. Every world leader should be trying to get Zelenskyy and Putin to a table.
I suppose the US State Department would rather Russia's assault on Ukraine end more like US interventions— regime change, torture and detentions, the establishment of death squad militias, armed insurgency and sectarian warfare, and then the collapse into a failed state.
Oh, this is probably a big reason why the US State Department is opposed to negotiations. China would mediate the talks between Putin and Zelenskyy.
British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, echoing prior statement from the US State Department, opposed ceasefire talks, when asked about efforts between Ukraine and Russian delegations to find a location for negotiations.
Rather than focusing on securing a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss is spending her time encouraging Britons to go fight Russia in Ukraine.
No word on whether Britons may go fight Saudi Arabia in Yemen, if they so choose.
Meanwhile, it would appear there may have been a breakthrough when it comes to ceasefire talks between Ukraine and Russia.
Associated Press confirms delegations will meet at an unspecified time and location on the Belarusian border.
UPDATE: At about 6pm ET on 25 February, I shared thread on reports that Zelenskyy and Putin might meet in Minsk to negotiate ceasefire. However, US State Department signaled their opposition.
I'll cover what happened since and how ceasefire talks became unlikely (for now).
According to @AFP, Zelenskyy at one point addressed Putin: "Fighting is going on all over Ukraine. Let's sit down at the negotiating table to stop the deaths of people."
Zelenskyy opposed talks in Minsk and instead reportedly suggested Warsaw for negotiations.
Widely reported were Russian government claims that the offensive was paused. Russian military were told not to engage Ukrainian soldiers. But it is difficult to tell if any media outlet in any country ever independently verified the claims, which Ukraine disputed.
Marcy Wheeler would like you to wrongly believe that journalist and political prisoner Julian Assange, not US/NATO, fostered geopolitical conditions that led to Russia's attack on Ukraine. It's a pretty vile accusation to spread as Assange's health deteriorates in Belmarsh.
How sick do you have to be to see a message of support for Ukrainians from a jailed journalist's partner and think, you know, I should further a decade-plus campaign of public mobbing instead of allowing this expression of solidarity to stand?
Yahoo! News reporters, including Michael Isikoff, who covered the Trump-Russia allegations extensively, revealed in 2020 that the CIA couldn't find proof Assange or WikiLeaks worked for Russian government. news.yahoo.com/kidnapping-ass…
What's terrifying is no officials in US govt or any EU govt will give Russian President Vladimir Putin a meaningful incentive to back off his military objectives. In fact, US hasn't allowed for diplomacy for weeks. All they did was keep crying, "Russia is going to invade" (1/5)
The repeated claims that Russia would invade on certain dates which came and went were supposedly to deter Putin. But they didn't deter anything. Instead, those alerts fueled escalation by US, NATO, Ukraine, and Russian military forces. (2/5)
If invasion was inevitable before tonight, it is cause starting in December (at least) foreign policy advisers and military generals in US government went down a road that guaranteed eventual Russian response. And US media played right into it, spreading every intel claim.
(3/5)
US Secretary of State Blinken says Russia carried out several "false flag operations" over weekend. To my knowledge, and after scanning US media, no false flag operations by either Ukraine or Russian-backed forces have been verified. Zero headlines confirming "false flag."
US officials like Blinken have staked credibility of US intelligence agencies, and their own credibility, on predicting Russia plans accurately. All the explosions, shelling, evacuations, etc, must confirm their theories of the future or else they look unreliable to world.
Russia apparently won't withdraw troops near Ukraine border that were deployed for drills. They see violence in eastern Ukraine as troubling and fear incursions into Russia. And whatever happened last couple nights is hard to discern fully since numerous OSCE observers evacuated
President Joe Biden says Russia President Putin is going to invade Ukraine. Reporter asks, "What reason do you have to believe he's considering that option at all?" Biden replies, "We have significant intelligence capability." Again, no evidence. Just trust us.
Biden says "Russia has falsely asserted" shelling of Ukrainian kindergarten was carried out by Ukraine forces. Russia tried to create "false justification" for invasion. But school was in Ukraine-controlled territory, not Russia-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine.
What Biden is saying would make sense if a school in territory controlled by Russia-backed separatists was shelled by their forces, and then blamed on Ukraine. Then US-NATO could say that's ludicrous and argue Russia was creating a pretext for troubling escalation.