Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
LawBeat Profile picture
@LawBeatInd
Feb 26, 2022 • 9 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Delhi HC organises National Seminar on Adjudication of IPR Disputes in India.
Chief Guest NV Ramana, Chief Justice of India and Guest of Honour Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs.
@nsitharaman
Chief Justice DN Patel, Delhi High Court welcoming the guests.
Justice Prathiba M Singh, Chairperson, IP Division Delhi informing about the vision said, an IP friendly adjudication regime will encourage local businesses and also recognise foreign IP owners.
Guest of Honour Nirmala Sitharaman, Union Minister of Finance and Corporate Affairs addressing the gathering said, "India is a State where growth and the focus on development has got to be strengthened from every side and IPR plays a very important role in that.
Sitharaman: The boost that is given through the support of Judiciary has actually encouraged more innovation, more copyrights and more patents in India.
Chief Guest, NV Ramana, Chief Justice of India speaking at the event said that in the field of IP a big background in the development of law should be looked into.
Justice Ramana further said that there is a emergent need to fill up the vacancies and there is also a need to increase the number of Judges, with better service conditions we may be able to attract more. Judicial infrastructure also needs to be improved.
Justice Ramana said, "Judicial infrastructure needs to be improved, unfortunately we are not even meeting the basic minimum standards in this area, it has been my endeavour since assuming the office of CJI, to put in place a mechanism."
Justice Sanjiv Narula, Delhi High Court, delivering the vote of thanks.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

LawBeat Profile picture
Jul 20
🚨Shortly in Delhi High Court-

Plea by Sonam Wangchuk’s wife, Dr Gitanjali Angmo against the Single Judge’s refusal to shift Wangchuk from Safdarjung Hospital to a private hospital of his choice.

Bench: CJ Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia

Hearing at 2:30PM Image
Matter taken up.

Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal appears for Sonam Wangchuk’s wife @GitanjaliAngmo

ASG Chetan Sharma requests the matter be taken up after 10-15mins as, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta is on his legs in Court 1 of Supreme Court.
Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal refers to July 16 order of the Court. Reads from it

Sibal: Factually what happens thereafter, there is monitoring of-course. Separately private doctors were also attending. On July 17, there are some parameters that appear in the blood sample. Potassium was 4.3. In the afternoon of July 17, potassium was in normal range.

Sibal: On July 18, Saturday, without any prior information, without telling the family or Mr. Wangchuk, he is carried away by the police forces. I (@GitanjaliAngmo) am not kept in the loop. The police forces took him to Safdarjung Hospital.

Sibal: There was no such sanction. In our reading, of the order.
Read 9 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Jul 19
🚨 Delhi High Court to hear shortly, the plea filed by Gitanjali Angmo, the wife of Sonam Wangchuk, alleging that his confinement at Safdarjung Hospital is unconstitutional.
The urgent hearing will take place before Justice Mini Pushkarna.
Kapil Sibal for Wangchuk & Angmo: He is not under detention and there is no offence. We want to take him to @medanta
@medanta Kapil Sibal: They said potassium levels have dropped but they are back to 3.2. We want to take him to @medanta
Read 23 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Jul 3
RAJA RAGHUVANSHI MURDER CASE

Supreme Court to hear shortly plea by State of Meghalaya challenging the bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, the prime accused in the murder of her husband.

Bench: Justices MM Sundresh and Sheel Nagu
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appears before Court on behalf of State of Meghalaya.

SG: This is really shocking.. I will show four pages. this is a case where the couple goes to Meghalaya, it is a pre-determined murder, wife takes husband to some hilly areas and kills..there are three accomplices...assaulted, he was killed and dead body was thrown in the hills..
Justice Sundresh: Who actually killed..

SG: I will show three pages..she was arrested in Uttar Pradesh..she was absconding..
Read 12 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Jun 22
Arvind Malhotra vs High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Sr Adv Balbir Singh: My recommendation was made on 23. 9. 2025. Collegium recommendation says two vacancies were there for promotee judges . Two juniors were recommeded. I was interacted with on 19th and recommendation on 23rd without having my reply.

Justice BV Nagarathna: These are matters where on judicial side we cannot say disclose this and disclose that. Merely because you are a senior does not mean you will be recommeded. Once collegium discusses, we cannot intervene. There is secrecy involved...
Justice Nagarathna: There is no rejection of your candidature. We don't know what does your recommendation say. It is about subjective satisfaction of High Court collegium. Can supreme court on judicial side ask them look into this and look into that. If this happens then where are we heading?
Justice Joymalya Bagchi: We would have understood if High Court collegium went against SC order, but their decision has been accepted by the supreme court.
Read 5 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Jun 19
[PIL for separate Ladies Bar Room and other amenities for lady lawyers in Courts across India]

Lady Counsel: Your lordships have directed that they directed that the Advocates who are keen to appear for civil service exam they should have court exposure of at-least 3 yrs, but will not there are many systematic barriers roadblocks. There is absence of fixed stipend for newly addressed Advocates in the courts.

CJI Surya Kant: We must give compliments for the amount of research, the hard work, and in the way you have collected. We really admire and we feel that there are people who are committed to the cause of the judicial system and for the legal fraternity. Commendable job, you’ve done! And all these young girls who are party, to this information. We pay our compliments with each of them.Image
CJI: Very remarkable job they have done and right from South to North to the West. This is the most satisfying experience that we have seen.

Counsel: We have also prepared a short PPT. To show the actual position of the lady’s bar rooms and its PATHETIC, especially within 50kms range of this honourable court. Ghaziabad, the prime city of Uttar Pradesh, Greater Noida, it doesn’t have any Bar room for ladies. It’s just like the feeling is- you go! We are not supposed to be there. We are not to be seen!
Counsel: In Ghaziabad, I’ve heard that the Advocates (ladies) are supposed to be there from 10am-1pm only once you send away your children to school and husband to office, come to the court. And by 1’o clock go back! We don’t have any facilities, we cannot go bak till 4pm. The lady advocates are not SEEN for MAJOR FINAL ARGUMENTS for the cases, for cross examinations in Surajpur Court.

They say- ‘Lady advocates will start doing politics while sitting in ladies bar room, so NO NEED of ladies barroom’: Counsel submits
Read 10 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Jun 19
“You are a serial PIL Litigant”

Supreme Court today dismissed a plea seeking a CBI probe into alleged horse-trading behind TVK’s trust vote victory in the Tamil Nadu Assembly and a direction for President’s Rule pending investigation.

Bench: CJI Surya Kant & Justice V. Mohana Image
Advocate CR Jaya Sukin alleged rampant political horse-trading: MLAs are flown in chartered flights, money is distributed, contracts are promised. Democracy is being destroyed.

He urged the Court to intervene “to save democracy in this country.”
Advocate: We are NOT in a democratic country.

CJI Surya Kant: Which party are you talking about?

Advocate: I’m here only for Tamil Nadu, but this Court must know what is happening.

The Bench eventually declined to entertain the plea.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(