Big 🧵: We constantly hear that Putin is a master media strategist, but here’s a thread on WW2, national heroes, myth, and why he cannot win the media war at home.
In short, enthusiasm for the war is going to crater because Putin's propagandists have an impossible task.
The key way in which Soviet writers - I've written an entire book on this - created a hugely popular myth of national self-sacrifice in WW2 was by focusing on people, not events. The papers were filled with stories of ordinary people laying down their lives for the greater good.
This was a hugely effective approach even as the country was in the depths of torment.
In short, readers connect with humans, not with tactics, strategy, or even which towns and cities are under attack.
It takes a lot to make people *really* care about cities in the way they care about people (and, in my book, I explain how one of the ways this was done with Stalingrad was by personifying the city...but that's a digression...).
The problem Putin has today is twofold. One relates to internal media. The Russian media is under strict instructions to call the invasion a "special operation." This bland term sounds like something out of a Soviet bureaucrat's dictionary. It has no emotional resonance.
State outlets aren't reporting on casualties or heroic incidents. Look @ the front page of Argumenty i fakty, one of Russia's largest papers, today. Dark, black pictures. A handful of balaclava-covered faces. Some historical nonsense about imperialism/the west.
The few remaining independent media outlets have been threatened with reprisals for calling the invasion what it is. But the problem is that, if you don't call the war a "war," and you can't cover the troops fighting it, how can you create national heroes?
How can you create enduring and appealing myths? The answer is that you can't.
That leads us to the second problem Putin has: Ukraine is absolutely nailing the propaganda war. I don't need to reiterate the point, because you ALL know it by now.
Heroic, brave Zelensky defending his city against an overwhelming invader vs. crazy grandpa Putin in his bunker; "Russian ship, go fuck yourself"; cheery Ukrainians welcoming Russians to hell; citizens singing the national anthem on the streets of Kyiv.
But that's not just a media war Ukraine is winning in the West and on Twitter: that stuff is going to seep through into the Russian infospace too. Why do you think Putin is moving to shut down access to FB, Twitter, etc. in Russia? Because they're screwed.
Putin's propagandists can't win if they can't make heroes. And this is just the beginning. Wait til the bodies start arriving home, for the videos of Russian grandmothers wailing in the streets over lost boys conscripted & sent to die for a war of nothing, a war without purpose.
🧵 Another bizarre piece from Simon Jenkins in the Guardian. This time, he lays into the idea that Russia is any threat at all to Western Europe then, bizarrely, implies that Putin has had no hand in choosing his aggressive path. Let’s take it apart.
First, Jenkins brings up “Godwin’s Law,” which is, frankly, a terrible argument. It’s a gambit used to lazily dismiss serious arguments about the nature of the past or dictatorships (see also: anyone who says fascism cannot exist today).
Jenkins then brings up two disastrously weak and ill-informed claims in one line, which is good going even by his standards:
Here's what a Russian attack on the UK looks like:
- Cyber attacks target healthcare, banking, energy. They look like they come from criminal gangs, not the Kremlin.
- Moscow funnels money to criminals in the UK to commit arson, larceny, and violence.
- Now the nasty bit...
- ...UK is in low-level chaos. Government not sure if/how to respond.
- A series of bombs go off in UK cities, killing dozens.
- Russia buzzes UK air and naval space with planes and boats. Is this enough for the UK to act?
- London does not confront Russia.
- More bombs go off in cities.
- The country is worried & the economy is tanking. The energy grid is buckling. Banks are beginning to creak.
- A bomb on a UK commercial airplane explodes, killing every passenger on board.
My new article on how deranged Russian nationalists were engaging in memory warfare online before the state got involved is out today! Here’s how grassroots myth-making around WWII shaped narratives that appear in Putin's propaganda now. 🧵
I looked at an online hub of nationalist, alt-history sci-fi back in the 2010s. Members co-wrote and self-published wacky time-travel tales set during pivotal moments in history. They're obviously all shit and unreadable, but... sciendo.com/article/10.247…
They were absolutely obsessed with Stalingrad, which they saw as a mythic moment of annihilation & resurrection. Their heroes, emasculated men from the present, fought Nazis, space lizards, and—importantly—nasty, nasty Americans to make "new" Stalingrads.
🧵 Let's take these absurd claims apart 1 more time:
"It started in 2014 with the Ukraine coup and the counter-coup."
- Not a coup. A largely peaceful protest, which was supported nationwide, ended when the Ukrainian President ordered protesters killed then fled the country.
“RT’s efforts include…recruiting Western political commentators and influencers, including Canadians, with the goal of leveraging them to produce and disseminate content that would reduce Western public & political support for Ukraine.”
Independent filmmakers do not simply rock up in occupied Ukraine to spend months filming Russian troops “unauthorized.”
25 years of the Putin regime and still people do not get that there is no freedom of speech in Russia. There is no journalistic establishment. There is no spirit of open inquiry. There is just the state and state control.
Maybe it’s a brilliant film. I don’t know. I haven’t seen it. But it’s been made in collaboration with the Russian state. Inexcusable that Canadian organizations should be funding it.