Why are we not seeing many drones in UKR war?
A few quick answers: 1) Equipment/Acquisitions: Neither side has woven significant numbers of armed UAS into their armies yet in major way 2) Air Defenses: Both have em, still active, all the way down to MANPADS.
Also both sides still flying fighters. Back to above, the drones they do have are highly vulnerable to that. Gotta take down both to get the value of current generation of slow UAS
3) and most significant: Operations/Strategy:
Russian strategy so far was assumption they could collapse UKR govt from inside with sabotage and SOF, combined with a few missile strikes and quick thunder run convoys into the cities. All in 1 day. It didn't work.
Now we likely see RU try to suppress air defenses completely, pummel cities with artillery/missiles/air strikes, and, if no ceasefire, take cities with armor+infantry (with UKR trying to make that a painful urban fight).
In that next potential stage, UKR UAS likely unable to fly and/or shot down/nonfactor , as just not at any scale yet, while Russian UAS would be used to support, especially in ISR for the ground ops.
But again, the two sides just dont have same numbers/armed UAS capability as US did in our urban COIN fights in Iraq cities nor it seems yet the Turk quasi conventional doctrine model from Libya/Azerbaijan, etc down yet. If an insurgency, UAS shift back to the role seen before
Interesting thing to watch for will be whether UKR civilians start to use civilian small drones in much the way ISIS and then Taliban etc did, to observe and harass and even jury-rig them to bomb Russians.
For example, you see all sorts of reports of UKR civilians now making Molotov Cocktails, to use in an urban fight. But that is 1939 resistance tech.
If this goes further, I expect to see a "Drone Molotov Cocktail" video go viral at some point.
In turn, as far as we've seen, Russians don't have a lot of anti-small drone gear (what our military had to quickly buy last few years)
They do seem to be bringing in a lot of cell-phone jamming equipment (the white trucks that you see in the convoy video), so likely turn to that
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why has Ukraine been so successful at information warfare/propaganda vs the supposed Russian masters of it?
A thread 🧵 of 10 persuasion messaging themes working for them:
1) Pre-Bunking
In the past, Russia was essentially pushing against an open door.
This time, a network style coalition got ahead of it and preempted and pre-bunked the Russian goal of justifying a long planned invasion as an emergency response.
Elements ranged from UKR govt to Biden administration and US intelligence agencies to key NATO states (Baltics especially) to online democracy activists to OSINT trackers.
Many of my national security colleagues are filled with deep angst this week over what the Afghan withdrawal means for the future of US power.
I feel the same way, but in looking at the events of 2021 at home.
The insurrection of January 6, a major political party turning on science to effectively aid and abet a deadly pandemic, and now Supreme Court going to bizarre lengths to ignore the Constitution for a minority political ideology (private citizen bounty hunting abortion…what?)
This all is the midst of a concerted push to pull voting rights from certain minorities swing voters to lock in power in key electoral states and a false political conspiracy theory about a stolen election moving from the extreme to accepted “truth” among 40% of the population.
It is week 2 of our Cybersecurity Threats and Trends course @Future_of_War@asu
This week is cybercrime...
@Future_of_War@ASU Discussion questions:
What are the various forms of Cybercrime?
What key issues do megabreaches present, not just to the victim, but the wider ecosystem?
Explain the issues presented by Ransomware.
Would you pay it or not?
....
@Future_of_War@ASU What can we do to limit the incidence and costs of cybercrime?
How do you see cyber crime evolving?
So many policy wonks and Senators want to talk things like number of Navy ships,
but this is as much or more of a weakness in our strategic competition with China
1) Our science advantage was utterly crucial advantage in every aspect (military, economic, cultural etc) of Cold War. Undermined now 2) a major party divorcing from basic science (and thus reality) undermines every policy, from weapons to energy to climate to health to cyber etc
Think of the longterm, strategic loss we’ve suffered by one political party deciding to argue the elementary school level basic science of a greenhouse effect or how a virus spread.
I obviously love warships, but that mattered far more than a few more LCS.
The online world has been a crucial tool for education and connection, especially during the pandemic. But it has also spread a new kind of threat. Viral misinformation, deliberately spread disinformation, conspiracy theories, and hate speech run rampant.
The resulting problems have harmed everything from our democracy, culminating in the events of January 6th, to our public health, where an “infodemic” of false information about COVID continues to cost lives and hurt vaccination efforts.