I'm an author on the new #ipcc report and I study the connections between climate change and emerging diseases. 🧵: is climate change connected to Covid? Could it cause more pandemics? Here's some of what the report says. (And also my own shameless thoughts)
You probably know that wildlife trade, agriculture, and deforestation are all driving disease emergence. But the new #ipcc impacts report shows that climate change is the backdrop for all of that. (Ch. 2, p. 41)
There's a great FAQ in chapter 2: "How does climate change increase the risk of diseases?" The short version: climate change is transforming every aspect of ecosystems. Growing human-wildlife contact gives that a chance to play out in human health.
(Shameless plug: it's still just a preprint, but if you want to read more about how climate change will reshuffle the global virome in animals, we've got a great @viralemergence study on bioRxiv that talks about these changes!)
The problem is that it's incredibly hard to actually document the human health impacts of climate change. Almost all of our evidence is about vector-borne and diarrheal disease. See this from the heath chapter (Ch. 7):
This is partly because those are some of the diseases that matter most on the frontline of climate impacts - which is great. But it's also because these are the impacts that are the most directly related to climate hazards (easier to attribute, but not necessarily higher burden)
When it comes to zoonotic diseases (those that start in animals - like Ebola, SARS, or influenza), things get more muddled and multicausal, and the evidence base becomes murkier.
We desperately need to close that "attribution gap". Even for vector-borne and diarrheal diseases, we're lagging way behind methodologically. Take this stunning figure - this framework is *ancient* in climate years. It dates back to a 2004 study! apps.who.int/iris/handle/10…
(Another shameless plug: developing methods to solve this attribution problem is what my own personal research has focused on for the last few years! e.g., this study on growing plague risk. Another *very* cool preprint coming on this in a couple weeks.)
So how about attribution for the health burdens of a pandemic? Does climate change shape human-to-human transmission?
Respiratory viruses can be very climate-sensitive, but we don't have a great sense of the net impact on flu, and human behavior is often more important (as it was with Covid). Still work to do here, but changes in spillover probably more important. (p. 7-32, 7-33)
The biggest lessons from COVID-19 in this report are about how we handle life in a time of crisis. There's tons in Chapter 7 and elsewhere, so I'll just stick to this key message (p. 7-7)
(Final shameless plug: we wrote last year about how emergency response on the pandemic would crash into climate change impacts. Interesting to revisit in retrospect nature.com/articles/s4155…)
So, in summary:
🦇 ecosystem changes impact disease spillover
🦟 we know the most about vector-borne and diarrheal disease
📈 we need better ways to identify more complicated impacts on infectious disease
🏥 social vulnerability matters; health system strengthening is adaptation
Yesterday we published the highest-resolution snapshot of the vertebrate-virus network; today, we're announcing our next big data project. If you help us pull it off, it could change everything from climate change research to early warning systems for spillover.
We don't normally announce data projects so early in development, but over the last few months, we've started to feel like all roads lead to the same place: this is the step disease ecology needs to take if we want to answer the big questions. It's also utterly doable.
Take a look at how @GBIF has transformed biodiversity science. When I was an undergrad, ecologists were still hesitant to put their most valuable data online; now there's a billion points - and a completely different scientific field. We can immortalize just as much data.
Jokes aside, I got curious about this - when an IPCC assessment report comes out, what do presidents say in the State of the Union address? So I looked back... 🧵
Tonight: some brief mentions of energy transition; next to nothing on impacts or the urgency of the problem. (@robinsonmeyer is right in above thread: this is *how* Joe Biden talks about climate change.)
Notable: no mention of the IPCC report that came out two days ago in #SOTU22. It turns out this is kind of a unique circumstance to have been in, though, because the State of the Union was so late in the year.
I've applied for bigger NSF grants as an early career prof than the funding that entire African countries have received to work on climate change research *over 30 years*. It's hard to wrap your mind around how severe the adaptation gap really is.
It's hard to contextualize these kinds of numbers sometimes, but $1-10m is easily the size of, say, most of the say 2-5 year research grants you apply for as a scientist. One grant's worth.
Also: external funders are interested in protecting African biodiversity from climate change, but health? poverty? Those aren't getting their day in the sun. Speaks to huge conversations @seyeabimbola@paimadhu + other folks are pushing about decolonizing global health
If - like me - you sometimes feel a bit lost when you hear climate experts talk about "transformative social change," I have a bit of a theory about why. Heartfelt thoughts from a scientist who worked on the new #ipcc report 🧵
Let's start with the basics. The @IPCC_CH report released yesterday is clear about the need for transformative change - like the Special Report on 1.5C was before, like the @IPBES transformative change assessment will be. There are no half solutions to a planetary emergency.
I'm really grateful to other climate activists on Twitter and offline, who give me faith that we have both the courage to make those changes and the power to center them around ideas of justice and kindness.
If, in the two years of pandemic response, you found the phrase "I am begging you to care about other people" rattling around your brain: I am as a climate scientist begging you, today, to care about other people. It feels like this report is passing by unnoticed.
I'm speaking to everyone but especially public health folks. I feel utterly seasick at the idea that tomorrow I'll have to scroll through hundreds of Covid and Ukraine tweets to find the odd climate change one. I am begging you to listen. Dear god.
This report isn't the same as the one that came out a few months ago. It isn't the same as every other report. This is a huge moment for understanding the scale of loss of life that's coming. I need you to look at the stereogram just for five minutes until you see the shape
A key point from the #ipcc summary for policymakers: vaccines matter. New platforms like @CEPIvaccines can be tools for climate adaptation; but vaccine equity will sit at the heart of their efficacy. Covid shows us how this could become a point of climate injustice 💉⚖️
We've known this problem was coming for years, though - as just one example, before the pandemic started, Morgan Stanley was using our research to scout out billions in potential revenue from dengue vaccines in the U.S. and Europe.
(When I say our, I don't mean the royal we - here's our original study, led by @SadieRyan with a great team; you'll see these numbers and maps pop up at a few different points in the #ipcc report)