Instead of defending remarkable domestic progress, with foreign policy relegated to the back end of the speech, he needs to flip the order and build the speech around a historic moment when US leading a worldwide coalition in defense of freedom. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
criticism has become absurd. “Too slow!” “Not enough!” “The U.S. is trailing the E.U.!" Really? In a week, we hit Russia with heavy economic sanctions, commanded the moral high ground, changed the national security outlook of Europe, etc.
What have we done? We set up a perfectly unified alliance with the singular goal of making Putin pay a crushing economic price and inducing him to abandon his fixation on rebuilding the Russian empire.
Was our timing right? Denying the grievance-filled, unhinged Russian president a provocation by refusing to enact preemptive sanctions was wise. Instead, we effectively used the time to deploy intelligence, gaining a commanding position to shape world opinion.
Why is this a big deal? An inflection point has arrived for the United States and for democracy. The tide is turning against illiberal regimes in the existential battle between free and unfree nations.
What does this have to do with the economy and our agenda at home? When we undermine the results of elections, when we impede voting (the cornerstone of democ) and when we disparage the rule of law, we lose the moral capital to construct alliances
When we rescue our own economy and prepare for a new economy, we show that our ability to grow, innovate and provide opportunity dwarfs that of closed societies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If we have been looking for something that might unify polarized, divided democracies, defending Ukraine (and by extension, freedom) from Russian shock troops might fit the bill. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday sat yards away from his advisers in his marble fortress. He seemed both unhinged and diminished, a menacing, soulless figure dwarfed by a giant table. The we see Zelensky, out on the streets of Kyiv with his people
We have the perfect distillation of good and evil. Freedom and repression. Kindness and cruelty. The authoritarians don’t look “smart” or strong; they look scared and befuddled.
The divisions within GOP unsustainable. In the first group are tiny # who opposed Trump, supported his impeachment (at least the second one), condemned his assaults on the NATO alliance and denounced his Putin-worship. - less than 6 people washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
second group of Republicans, the cowardly and incoherent latecomers to Ukraine’s side. They would have us forget Trump’s appeasement and his unabated flattery for Putin, both of which they countenanced.
Some Republicans get so confused they lose track of who’s on Ukraine’s side. Taking the prize for incoherence, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)
It should come as no surprise that the largest ground war in Europe in 80 years and a shift in the entire geopolitical terrain got reduced to partisan scorekeeping and petty blame-casting by many in the media. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
We know the media habit to make every story into a political sporting contest denuded of moral content or substance. Who does this help? Aren’t the Rs clever? This framing is unserious and unenlightening, failing to serve democracy, which is under assault around the globe.
Let’s get some perspective. Russia’s invasion was decades in the making. Under three presidents, two Republican and one Democratic, we failed to address the threat Russia posed to democracy and the international order.
Russian officers need to understand the internatl law: The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilian objects and military objectives. Attacks may only be directed against military objectives. Attacks must not be directed against civilian objects.
Each party to the conflict must take all feasible precautions in the choice of means and methods of warfare with a view to avoiding, and in any event to minimizing, incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians and damage to civilian objects.
specific war crimes include: Making civilian objects the object of attack;
Extensive or wanton destruction of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
It’s not Democrats who have elevated transgender issues to a national obsession. Republicans are the ones who did that by whipping their base into a fury on the issue and convincing them that “elites” are trying to destroy their way of life washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Think how utterly depraved this is. Abbott wants to investigate children’s gender identity and strip parents of their children for seeking appropriate medical advice and treatment. Talk about big government. The intrusive power Abbott wants to grant the government is horrifying
Given the risk of mental health problems and suicide that trans youth face, the stunt itself endangers kids. But, of course, Abbott and his ilk don’t think of such things. Or perhaps they don’t care.
So have Republicans been barking up the wrong tree? Are Democrats tearing their hair out about their party being too “woke” freaking out over nothing? The data certainly contradicts the conventional wisdom. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
don’t confuse the genuine frustration among parents over school closures during the pandemic with the cultural wedge issues MAGA pols cook up. Democrats may have been tone-deaf as to the former, but it does not mean voters have bought into Republicans’ extreme ideas on schooling
Democrats in San Francisco infuriated parents by attempting to rename schools when they should have been figuring out how to reopen them. These are not parents seeking to ban books or bastardize history.