The reason there are government-appointed Commissioners in this city, costing the City Council millions, is the Caller Report which revealed deep problems in running three departments.
So far, we still await any significant accountability for those failings.
Six Labour councillors, including myself, have made the decision to vote against the cuts in this year’s budget.
Part of our decision relates to cuts to citizens’ services while the Commissioners receive a 50% pay increase, which is backdated.
Their presence is a drain on the city’s scant resources and it is far from clear whether the people of Liverpool are getting value for money.
The very least we should expect is transparency about what has gone wrong and the actions being taken to put it right.
Back in the summer, I asked whether Transparency UK’s 10-point anti-corruption plan was being actioned, as pledged during the mayoral election campaign.
I was assured that all of these points were incorporated into the Council’s plan, but I am yet to see the details.
I am a member of the Standards and Ethics Committee.
It is vital that by the time of the all-out elections in 2023 the electorate are reassured that the Council has turned a corner and they can be confident that we all meet the highest good practice standards.
Over the arms fair, the budget, and other issues, questions have too often been met with silence or obfuscation. Debate has been curtailed. Opposition has been cracked down on.
I am yet to see convincing evidence of the ‘culture change’ we were promised.
As elected representatives, we are tasked with acting in the best interests of our communities.
That responsibility takes priority over uncritical party loyalty.
I will continue to press for Council decisions to be given proper scrutiny, regardless of a few ruffled feathers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Full statement on why colleagues and I are voting against the cuts in this year’s budget:
As a matter of personal conscience and political judgement, we have come to the decision that we have no choice but to vote against this year’s Liverpool City Council budget on 2nd March.
We have supported attempts to draw up proposals that would amount to a no-cuts alternative. All these efforts have been rejected. The main elements of the budget are largely unchanged since the beginning of the consultation process.
We can’t accept that the recommended level of funds held in reserve for 2022/3 should rise by £10.7m when the city faces brutal cuts.
Why have a number of councillors in Liverpool, myself included, decided to vote against the budget?
It is because we do not agree with the proposals included in it?
Was this a rush of blood to the head?
No, we have argued alternative proposals and had them rejected as 'not robust.'
We have scrutinised it in meetings including a long Finance and Mayoral Performance Joint Select Committee.
We disagree that cuts in social care, SEND transport should go through, oppose Green Bin charges in a climate emergency, want the non-council libraries' continued existence guaranteed, not subject to a bidding process.