At Delphi Labs, we have a long list of ideas we'd like to build, but we're limited by time and focus
With this in mind, we've put together a list of 6 ideas we'd like to see built on @terra_money
We'll be organising the second Delphi hackathon soon where we'll encourage builders to explore these and other ideas
In the meantime, if you're a skilled builder with SC experience looking to pursue any of these, reach out as Labs is interested in funding + incubating you
1. Margin trading
Margin trading on-chain is inefficient since credit protocols only allow you to borrow less than what you put in, meaning leverage is limited at <2x
@mars_protocol's SC lending changes this, by allowing higher leverage for whitelisted SC use cases
A margin trading application built on top of Mars would allow users to use certain pre-defined assets as collateral in order to go leveraged long or short
Long: Borrows UST, buys more of the asset on Astroport
Short: Borrows some asset, sells it on Astroport
Both the collateral and the debt would be tracked by the smart contract, which would also include risk parameters and liquidation logic
The architecture is very similar to that of leveraged yield farming except the collateral is spot assets rather than LP shares
2. Cross-margin credit accounts (i.e. similar to @GearboxProtocol on Terra)
Once margin trading and leveraged yield farming both exist, the obvious next step is to combine them into a single product
You can think of it as the decentralised FTX product mentioned here
Create a credit account and deposit X UST as collateral.
Borrow 3-5X UST which you can use to interact with whitelisted applications / tokens (e.g. buying certain tokens on @astroport_fi, depositing in @ApolloDAO vaults or @NexusProtocol strategies)
The credit account SC would calculate a health factor taking into account the riskiness of the user's various assets and strategies
It'd enforce an account-wide LTV + margin threshold which if breached would allow liquidators to liquidate any of a user's collateral
This is an end-game crypto product experience, allowing users to have access to CEX like cross-margin experiences with the added benefit of incorporating farming strategies
Think about using your high-yield mAsset LP strategies as collateral for your degen LUNA long
Off-chain governance (similar to @SnapshotLabs) would use digital signatures to verify voting results without requiring participants to spend gas on transactions, reducing friction for gov participation
While competition is great, it does make UX challenging as users must browse through each one to find what they want
Instead, it'd be ideal if there was a platform that aggregated all existing marketplaces and allowed users to easily browse and buy NFTs from their favourite collections across all of them
This could also include features like:
- batch buying/selling for time and gas efficiency
- optimal routing for users who simply want to "sweep the floor" on a given collection
- batch listing, allowing sellers to list across all marketplaces
5. Prediction markets
Prediction markets are one of the OG blockchain use cases. While we're skeptical of the peer-to-peer model, we'd love to see someone build a peer-to-pool betting protocol focused around a specific niche (i.e. Synthetix for betting)
Fractionalising NFTs into fungible CW20s. This would democratise access to high-value NFTs (e.g. super rare GPs) by allowing anyone to gain exposure by buying fractions of an NFT or portfolio of NFTs
If you're a skilled dev/builder interested in pursuing any of these ideas, DMs are open
Regardless of whether we end up investing/incubating, happy to discuss designs and help scope out your ideas
Let's BUIDL the futur of france together 🤝🌕
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
During the lockdrop event next week, users will receive $MARS for depositing and locking $UST in the lockdrop
Their locked $UST will also accrue interest while locked as it's loaned out by the Red Bank
But what will this interest rate look like?
This is pure speculation, but it seems to me that the Mars $UST rate will eventually converge on the 20% @anchor_protocol rate. Why?
If it's <20%, users will just borrow $UST on Mars and deposit on Anchor to arbitrage the yield
This becomes even easier if Mars governance chooses to accept $aUST as collateral. In this case users can execute their very own Terra-native degenbox strategy
Deposit $aUST in Mars --> borrow $UST --> deposit in Anchor --> deposit $aUST in Mars --> rinse and repeat
Oracles are key crypto infrastructure, lying at the core of all debt-based protocols such as money markets, derivatives, perps, etc. They're also one of DeFi's biggest attack vectors
This article by @samczsun provides an excellent summary of the issues
2/ In terms of mech design, most PMs have used P2P architectures
In these designs, not only do LPs have to bootstrap each individual betting market but also the "yes" and "no" side of each market, effectively setting the odds and taking all the betting risk related to that mkt
3/ This means users' ability to bet on one side of a market is constrained by liquidity on the other side of that market
This has led to low liquidity, terrible odds and hardly any bet volume
Alpha leak: @astroport_fi is in audit and will be launching in mid November
DEXes are the core building block of any DeFi ecosystem. The launch of Astroport means @terra_money will now have a best-in-class AMM
Thread on why I think this and why it matters 👇
1/ As I see it, @astroport_fi provides two fundamental improvements to existing AMMs:
✦ Flexible pool model
✦ Token econ & governance
I'll cover each of them in turn
2/ Flexible pool model
Different AMMs use different algorithms (also referred to as "pool types") to price assets, with each one being appropriate for certain kinds of assets
For instance, Uniswap's xyk pool is appropriate for volatile assets but inefficient for stable assets