To those who live outside the right wing media echo chamber, this will just sound like mindless and vestigial, McCarthyite word salad...but Rubio is giving a shout out here to a decades-old, far right BS narrative about "cultural Marxism" that is pretty widespread.
To an alarming extent, the basic framework of the "cultural Marxism" narrative is the same as the "Judeo-bolshevism" narrative that informed fascist rhetoric in the 1930s.
David Neiwert, who's been studying and writing about the far right for decades, sums up the history very well here. dailykos.com/stories/2019/1…
A key figure who infused empirically-challenged talk of "cultural Marxism" into the political culture of the US right was Andrew Breitbart. The narrative drove much of his work as a right wing activist and propagandist who sought to push the GOP rightward.
Put most simply, the function of this "cultural Marxism" trope is that it enables people to reframe their reactionary response to cultural change as a principled opposition to "Communism."
"I hate BLM not because I'm a racist, but because they're Marxists."
"I hate feminism not because I'm a misogynist, but because feminism is cultural Marxism."
"I'm opposed to protecting the rights of trans folks not because I'm a transphobe, but because the trans rights movement is the trojan horse of Communism."
Don't forget that the "principled," "non-racist" way that conservatives framed their opposition to the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s was to claim that MLK and other activists were really "Communists."
I see Kim Reynolds opted for the George Wallace approach to the GOP SOTU response.
"Parents matter." "Local control of schools." "To hell with those out of touch intellectuals determining what kids should learn in school."
I appreciate Kim Reynolds' broad minded support for biofuels which, of course, has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that federally subsidized, agribusiness production of corn dominates her state's economy.
Are they called ICBMs because when you see them coming you shit your pants, or is that just a coincidence?
I was 15 when The Day After aired. I remember debating this question around the cafeteria lunch table. If you knew the bombs were coming, would you drive towards a primary target to die faster, or drive away to try to live (but possibly die a slow painful death)?
Related question: If your parents weren’t around, was it ok at age 15 to grab the keys, get in the car and start driving in one’s preferred direction? I seem to remember that this was a fairly unanimous “yes.”
I would love to read an essay on the theory and understanding of US History that animates contemporary conservative political culture. Time is both flat (Don Jr. and Eric as Texas freedom fighters) and also something that has alienated us from past "greatness."
As a starting point, I think Svetlana Boym's concept of "restorative nostalgia" helps get us some way toward understanding the nature of MAGA historical thinking (or ahistorical thinking, as the case may be).
We’re closer to nuclear war than we’ve been in decades while the Ukrainian President who Trump unsuccessfully tried to roll to win the 2020 election is valiantly defending his country, & all conservative Twitter wants to talk about is Hunter B & what a failed POTUS his dad is.
These people want voters to trust them to handle dire geo-political crises like the present one, and all they can think to do right now is come up with new ways to “own the libs.”
This is from last June. This is the person who hosted the “America First” conference at which close Trump allies MTG, Gosar, and Wendy Rogers spoke. This is not complicated. It’s also not a new problem for the GOP.
If you want to get really old school with the “Nazi who is trying to take over the GOP” theme, may I introduce you to MAGA-Nazi Arthur Jones who won a GOP primary in Illinois recently?
Receipts in this thread, where we also learn that both Eric and Don Jr appeared on the radio show of white nationalist James Edwards during the 2016 campaign.