Zelensky is exacerbating the danger to civilians by arming criminals, prohibiting men from leaving with their families, and telling civilians to fight Russians who don't want to fight them.
If you wanted to get civilians killed for pro-war Western media, then this is how.
If you want to get civilians killed, tell them to throw Molotov cocktails at vehicles that cannot even be damaged by Molotov cocktails -- which is what Zelensky's government is telling people to do.
Russians are trying to mitigate civilian casualties. Even Kadyrov has begged civilians to stay out of the fight.
But by arming them as Zelensky has done, they risk becoming unlawful combatants, which means they may not even be afforded basic protections like POWs.
What Zelensky is doing would make sense if this were a war of extermination, i.e., if Russians wanted to systematically wipe out Ukrainians. Then it's all hands on deck.
But this is obviously not that: several attempts at peace negotiations, Russians not flattening cities, etc.
The fact that Russians aren't trying to wipe out Ukrainians -- even the media has noted their reliance, for now, on precision strikes -- is probably why Zelensky is using such insane rhetoric that evokes mass murder. You have to literally eject your brain to believe that.
Zelensky *wants* civilians to get killed so that NATO/US will get involved. He faked pictures of himself on the front lines of combat while talking to Sean Penn and suing for expedited EU membership. But he has the interests of civilians at heart?
Conservatives treating Zelensky to hero worship are actually familiar with these tactics, they just come from totally different places and groups like Hamas, which attacks from within populated areas and arms civilians so that retaliation inevitably hurts civilians.
Stuff like "Russia could have mitigated civilian casualties by not invading" is illustrative of how we got into this mess: thinking that other countries don't have legitimate security interests and basing our views of geopolitics around Avengers movies and flag emojis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Ukrainian government, including Zelensky, *lied* about Russians critically damaging the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in a way that caused radiation levels to rise, which they used to justify getting US/NATO involved.
The Ukrainian government is actively trying to start WWIII.
I'm not pro Russia, I'm not pro Ukraine, but lying like this is irresponsible and despicable because Ukrainian officials know Western media will just repeat whatever they say.
I don't care that Ukraine’s government and Zelensky have been sanctified by the media and morons in both parties--they're a threat to the United States at this point and any other country they try to emotionally blackmail and morally manipulate into escalating this conflict.
"House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy came with both a Ukrainian themed pocket square and a Ukrainian flag lapel pin. That's about as Ukrainian as you can get. Even the president of Ukraine doesn’t do that very often."
lmao nobody tell Jonah Goldberg and David French
2/
"What McCarthy conspicuously didn’t do was don an American flag. Because within the context of last night, the American flag was literally irrelevant. Lots of our leaders feel that way all of a sudden."
The message: nationalism is OK for everyone except Americans 3/
You will never see these losers talk about American nationalism they way they do about Ukrainian nationalism
Nothing like Lucianne Goldberg's son and some librarian telling you outright that only foreign nationalism is acceptable while also calling into question your patriotism for putting American interests first
This is actually typical with National Review types
Recall that Rich Lowry cashed in on the Trump moment by writing a book in praise of nationalism, only to denounce the movement later as being guilty for January 6
The people who talk about principles the most often have few
Yes, Russia is also guilty of civilian casualties--no, the Ukrainian military is not innocent of this. Anyone pushing this simplistic line is either lying to you or extremely naive
Both Russia and Ukraine have a history of brutality toward each other, which is why Russian's more restrained approach (so far) has been so unusual, and why Ukrainian ruthlessness is unsurprising
All this is only a surprise if you've never heard of the Donbas war
In 2014, the Obama administration backed a color revolution that toppled a Russia-neutral Ukrainian government and selected a rabidly anti-Russian one to take its place. It has been called the "Facebook Revolution" because of the role the media and social media played
NGOs played a huge role in this too, like they have in other color revolutions. But Ukraine was arguably the first that brought to bear the full force of digital journalism and social media. Another term used is "The Journalist's Uprising" en.ejo.ch/media-politics…
What's interesting now about this is that NGOs, social media, and media are being used in a similar way to shape public opinion about the war with the ultimate goal of getting other countries involved. Blue checks/journalists are even getting angry at people calling out misinfo
That building is an Azov base and the strike appears to have been aimed at deterring civilian recruitment (see flyer)
Reposting and clarifying because there are civilians in the area, but the strike was aimed at a *military* target because Azov has used this location for a while