David S. Sytsma Profile picture
Mar 2 18 tweets 7 min read
🧵 Protestant teaching on #NaturalLaw appears already in Philip Melanchthon’s Loci communes (1521), & his treatment had a much larger impact.

We can illustrate this impact by recurring use of Greek terms from Stoic philosophy: “common notions” & “preconceptions” (προλήψεις). /1
The 1521 Loci communes marginalia highlights 1) the existence and 2) essence of NL (esse legem naturae / quid lex naturae).

1) “Paul teaches in the second chapter to the Romans, in a remarkably fine and clear enthymeme (enthymemate), that there is in us a law of nature.” /2
2) Melanchthon defines natural law as moral “common principles” and “first conclusions”. They are analogous to common principles in theoretical disciplines, called “common notions” (κοιναὶ ἐννοίαι) or “preconceptions” (προλήψεις). /3

e-rara.ch/bau_1/content/…
Prof. Charlotte Methuen has a helpful summary of this passage in her article “Lex Naturae and Ordo Naturae in the Thought of Philip Melanchthon,” Reformation and Renaissance Review 3 (2000): 110-25. /4 doi.org/10.1558/rrr.v0…
Melanchthon often repeats these common principles. In Comm. on Aristotle’s ethics, M relates principles to the eternal wisdom of the divine mind (Antti Raunio, in Lutheran Reformation and the Law [Brill 2006], p50). /5
books.google.com/books?id=PRNYE…
There is development in Melanchthon’s doctrine of natural law in the context of political philosophy, as @LangballeJensen has argued in his book (Brill 2020). But the idea of common principles is a consistent teaching, repeated in the 1535 Loci communes (trans. Methuen, p121): /6
This is important bc, as Richard Muller argues (Unaccommodated Calvin, 128-30), Melanchthon’s 1535 Loci communes was a major source for Calvin’s revision of his own 1539 Institutes—and thus also for his 1540 Romans commentary. /7
books.google.com/books?id=16nmC…
Melanchthon’s use of “principia” is interesting, bc of similarity to the medieval discussion in Aquinas who also has “communia principia” of speculative/ practical reason, & conclusions therefrom (ST I-II.94.4).

But I am concerned here with terms κοιναὶ ἐννοίαι & προλήψεις. /8
Now these “common notions” (κοιναὶ ἐννοίαι) and “preconceptions” (προλήψεις) that Melanchthon equates with common principles of knowledge are Stoic terms, and were also appropriated by Middle Platonists, Neo-Platonists, and early Christians. /9 doi.org/10.1515/978311…
16/17thC authors knew of the Stoic provenance. Although we shouldn’t assume that 16/17thC authors always intended the precise Stoic usage, when they adopt the same terms to explain Romans 2:14-15 it is indicative of Melanchthon’s general impact on later tradition. /10
5 later examples: Calvin, Junius, Zanchi, Polyander, & Hale.

John Calvin: “it is...evident that they have some notions of justice and rectitude, which the Greeks call preconceptions (προλήψεις), and which are implanted by nature in the hearts of men.” (Comm. on Romans 2:14) /11
Franciscus Junius: “The natural law is that which is innate to creatures endowed with reason and informs them with common notions of nature, that is, with principles and conclusions adumbrating the eternal law by a certain participation.” (The Mosaic Polity, tr. Rester, 44) /12
Junius:“Therefore, there are two kinds of common notions (which the ancient philosophers used to call κοινὰς ἐννοίας or προλήψεις):one, regarding the end to which we act by the natural law;the other, regarding those things which pertain to the same end.” (Mosaic Polity, 45) /13
Girolamo Zanchi: “The Stoics do not doubt...that those common notions (κοιναι ἔννοιαι) have been put in our souls by nature just as sparks and seeds of the sciences. The Apostle also seems to confirm this doctrine [in Rom. 2:14-15]...” (Operum theologicorum, [1617-19],3:637) /14
Johannes Polyander: “Natural law is the light and direction of sound reason in the intellect, informing man with common notions (κοιναῖς ἐννοίαις) to distinguish right from wrong, and honorable from shameful” (Synopsis of a Purer Theology, ed. Dolf te Velde, 1:437) /15
Matthew Hale: “generally the Stoicks whose communes notitiae [common notions] and anticipations, are no other then severall Expressions of this Naturall Law of God given to Man and inscribed in his heart [Rom. 2:14–15].” (Of the Law of Nature, ed. David S. Sytsma, 41-42) /16
There are Melanchthon scholars on this bird app:

@keen_ralph, trans. of M’s Comm. on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, bk 1
@ehutchinson1513, trans. of M’s Epitome philosophiae moralis (in process)
@LangballeJensen, author of A Humanist in Reformation Politics (Brill, 2020)

/17
@SvenssonManfred, writing on Melanchthon & Protestant commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics.

If you like Melanchthon, give these scholars a follow!

/18

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David S. Sytsma

David S. Sytsma Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SytsmaDavid

Mar 1
I just noticed that I own THL Parker’s review copy of L. Smits' Saint Augustin dans l'œuvre de Jean Calvin (1958). The invitation reads “For review in S.J.T. / T.F.T.” TF Torrance invited Parker to write the review for Scottish Journal of Theology, which appeared in 1961. 🧵 1/4
It looks like Parker underlined Calvin’s claim “Augustine is entirely ours” & noted Calvin’s mentions of Augustine in his Romans Commentary. This is interesting for 2 reasons:

1) Parker produced a critical edition of Calvin’s Commentary on Romans for @Brill_History in 1981. 2/4
2) Parker’s review for Scottish Journal of Theology (1961) begins with Calvin’s claim “Augustinus est totus noster” — Augustine is entirely ours. 3/4

doi.org/10.1017/S00369…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 22
🧵 Some treat Aquinas as if he’s the only important scholastic theologian for Protestants, or think of Protestant scholasticism as a kind of neo-Thomism. But historically Protestants read, and even adopted doctrines from, a variety of medieval and early modern scholastics. /1
After Luis de Molina SJ introduced the concept of God’s “middle knowledge” (scientia media), Protestants took various positions for and against. 17th c. Arminians, following the early appropriation by Arminius, adopted this Molinist doctrine. /2
doi.org/10.1163/978900…
Many 17th c. Lutherans, notably Johann Gerhard, also accepted the concept of middle knowledge and cited Jesuits like Martin Becanus in support. /3
Read 12 tweets
Feb 19
🧵 The historical Calvin vs. the Calvin of faith

One way to think about diverse reactions to Aquinas and medieval scholasticism in Reformed circles – both past and present – is to recognize at least two main approaches to the authority and interpretation of Calvin. /1
I’ll call these approaches the “historical Calvin” & the “Calvin of faith”.

1) The Calvin of faith: This perspective views Calvin as normative for whatever is identified as the Reformed faith, while interpreting him for the most part in isolation from his 16th c. co-laborers. /2
Scholars w/this view regard Calvin as the best or at least most representative Reformed theologian on all topics, & are less willing to consider weaknesses. Methodologically a book with a title “Calvin & ABC modern theologian on XYZ topic” is likely to fall into this category. /3
Read 12 tweets
Dec 3, 2021
“The story of Thomas Aquinas and Protestantism has yet to be written, and it is not identical with the story of Thomas and Luther.” – David Steinmetz, Luther in Context (2002)

Since then we’ve learned a bit more of this story. 🧵 w/ examples from 16th c. Reformed tradition: /1
I pass over for the most part the fine studies of John Patrick Donnelly, S.J.: Calvinism and Scholasticism in Vermigli’s Doctrine of Man and Grace (Brill, 1976) and “Calvinist Thomism” (1976). Read them if you haven’t. The following is by way of addition to Donnelly. /2
Worth noting that diverse medieval streams fed into the Reformed tradition. Although there is a strong Thomist influence, even J.P. Donnelly warned: “The specifically Thomist quality of 17th c. Calvinist scholasticism should not be over-emphasized.” (“Calvinist Thomism” 453) /3
Read 31 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(