Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
@ClintEhrlich
Mar 3, 2022 • 5 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Intense Russian strike in Kharkov.

Likely a Kalibr cruise missile, since the jet engine appears to go silent upon impact.
Another angle of the latest Russian strike on Kharkov.
Fiery aftermath of the latest Russian strike on Kharkov.
Driving through Kharkov, surveying the damage from Russian air strikes.

The scale of the damage we are witnessing is in tension with Russian claims of "surgical" strikes.

That's the nature of a full invasion. It gets very messy, very fast.
More horrifying footage.

Whole sections of Kharkov leveled.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Clint Ehrlich

Clint Ehrlich Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClintEhrlich

Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Dec 7, 2023
Yesterday, Google shocked the world with its new AI, "Gemini."

But it turns out the video was fake: the A.I. *cannot* do what Google showed.

It's my opinion, as a lawyer and computer scientist, that (1) Google lied and (2) it broke the law. 🧵 Image
There are three things that excited people about Google's viral Gemini demo:

1. The AI processed video, not just still images

2. The AI inferred context without being spoon-fed prompts

3. The AI seamlessly spoke and understood conversational audio

None of them are real.
Here's the truth about Gemini:

1. It processes still images, not video.

2. It requires detailed prompting.

3. It communicates best in writing, not audio.

You won't get any of this from the viral video, but it's spelled out in Google's documentation for developers. Image
Read 13 tweets
Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Sep 14, 2023
UPDATE: I've investigated further, and I've discovered serious problems with the alien mummies.

I believe the best available evidence points to an elaborate hoax.

Here's why I've become suspicious. 1/N 🧵
First, closer review of the scientific testimony presented to Peru's Congress reveals serious contradictions.

One of the major points of conflict is whether embryos were detected inside the alien eggs.

I haven't seen this contradiction discussed before. Image
Prof. Galetskiy was able to identify embryo-like structures inside the eggs.

He expressly started that brain and lung development was visible, equivalent to a human 8 weeks post-conception. Image
Read 11 tweets
Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Sep 13, 2023
Most people think the alien bodies shown to Mexico's Congress were fake.

But I have the reports from an international team of scientists.

You NEED to read their findings. They all say the aliens are real. 1/N 🧵 Image
The alien specimens we're discussing were found in a mine in Peru.

Radiocarbon dating indicates they are at least 1,000 years old.

But evidence presented to the Congress of Peru goes much further than that. Image
Sophisticated DNA testing was performed on the alien specimens by an international consortium.

The results were presented by geneticist Salvador Angel Romero, who was trained at UNAM – Mexico's equivalent of MIT. Image
Read 32 tweets
Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Sep 12, 2023
Let's honor the victims of 9/11 by telling the truth:

We were attacked by a terrorist organization that was WORKING FOR the U.S. government.

The proof is available online for anyone brave enough to read it. 1/N 🧵 Image
People want to believe that the DoD and CIA stopped supporting Bin Laden in the 1980s.

That simply isn't true.

Al Qaeda's #2 leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, was working for the U.S. government *in 2001.* Image
It was part of an operation called Gladio B.

The original Operation Gladio recruited fascists to fight communism inside Europe.

Its successor, Gladio B, recruited Islamists to fight Russia in Central Asia. Image
Read 16 tweets
Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Aug 3, 2023
🚨 BOOM: David Grusch may have seen proof of an extra-terrestrial mothership commanding a tic-tac UAP.

It sounds crazy, but it's spelled out in declassified documents.

Buckle up.🧵1/N Image
In 2021, it appears Mr. Grusch was the Acting Chief of the Operations Center for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO).

He led a team of 30, and he was responsible for the President's Daily Brief.

Any intel at NRO went through Mr. Grusch.
Image
Image
It's important to understand that NRO has the largest budget of any intelligence agency.

It has more resources than the NSA. More than the CIA.

It's the agency that creates and controls U.S. spy satellites and other top-secret sensor platforms. Image
Read 18 tweets
Clint Ehrlich Profile picture
Aug 2, 2023
People think we can ignore evidence of UFOs, because the probability of aliens visiting Earth is low.

There's a giant hole in their reasoning!

I can prove it using probability theory, and I can show you how to explain the problem to others. 1/N 🧵 Image
Skeptics often tell you they are 99% sure aliens have not arrived on Earth.

In their mind, those are the same odds as reaching into a jar with 100 stones – 99 gray, 1 black – and randomly pulling out the only black stone.

But there's actually a HUGE difference! Image
We can believe that two things are both 1% probable, while being *more confident* in one of those estimates than the other.

In Bayesian probability theory, we call this the "strength" of the "prior."

("Prior" just means how confident we are "prior" to seeing new evidence.)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(