Williamson was appointed Sec for Defence on Nov 2 2017. Days after FBI revealed it was investigating suspected Russian assets/agents operating in London. Some of these had met Foreign Office officials. These including Johnson, then Foreign Secretary 2/ theguardian.com/politics/2017/…
Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor, was just one of these. Johnson denied meeting him until a photo emerged. Mifsud subsequently vanished without trace.
Days later, Theresa May made her landmark speech: "Russia we know what what you are doing" 3/
I wrote about the Russian connections to Brexit & Conservative party which unleashed a world of trouble.
Meanwhile, Isabel Oakeshott had a tip off. A person "high up in govt" with intelligence connections rang Richard Tice who passed it on to her. 4/ theguardian.com/politics/2017/…
This call prompted Isabel Oakeshott to go back into the Banks emails. And make a shock discovery.
This statement has not previously been published.
In it, she says: "I have no doubt that Banks & Wigmore have been acting as agents of influence of the Russian state" 5/
Under cross-examination, I had to explain how I obtained the emails. It's a matter of court record - & therefore reportable - that source believed that person who tipped off Tice about Banks's Russian connections was...drum roll...Gavin Williamson, then sec of defence 6/
Oakeshott gave the emails and this statement to the Sunday Times.
This is new & has not been previously published.
It's a letter from Sunday Times editor on Nov 17, 2017 to Oakeshott indemnifying her in event of legal action from publishing Arron Banks/Russia emails 7/
I don't know what happened & why Sunday Times didn't publish until 8 months later when @peterjukes & I bumped them into it. But kudos to Oakeshott for saying she couldn't stand by while LeaveEU attacked journalists & MPs who'd questioned Russia's role in UK politics 8/
On Nov 14, 2017, Theresa May called out Putin in strongest possible terms. A landmark moment. First time, UK govt acknowledged Russia's attack on our democracy.
We do know FBI's investigation came to London. We know that key individuals & organisations were based here.
We know Johnson was knee deep in Russian connections & money.
We do know Theresa May tried to call out the threat.
10/
Was there disagreement within cabinet on what to do with new public info about Russia?
Williamson - it's claimed - tipped off Tice & Oakeshott.
May made her speech.
And Johnson? He said he'd seen "not a sausage"
UK connections to Mueller investigation were buried.
11/
So. Is it curious Johnson gives knighthood to Williamson now? Aren't there bigger things going on in world?
I don't know. But I can't publish in Observer because it involves Banks. News International involved. Indie & Standard owned by son of KGB spy.
So putting it here.
12/
Final weird oddity. The article I wrote at that time on Russian connections to Brexit includes Johnson's relationship with Russian "diplomat" Sergey Nalobin. He ran an influence op targeting Conservative MPs.
I've just remembered this and further details about Gavin Williamson tipping off Tice & Oakeshott about Banks's Russian connections is actually in my witness statement.
Again, this is a matter of court record & is fully reportable. It just wasn't reported anywhere. 14/
NEW: I’ve found an opaque financial vehicle owns a large chunk of the Observer. And neither it or the Guardian will say who it is. Why?
Well there is a clue. Which goes by way of Saudi Arabia… 1/
The capture of US media orgs is accelerating. And the UK is next in line. The BBC has fallen to an AI hype guy. And my old newspaper, the Observer, is publishing Palantir puff pieces.
Distracted by the slaughter of children in Iran & Lebanon? Me too! But what better time could there be for govt to quietly relaunch its Digital ID plan?
Missed it? Me too! But look who’s celebrating…
The director of ‘govt innovation’ at the Tony Blair Institute! 1/
The govt noisily scrapped Digital ID after huge pushback when nobody bought its ‘it’ll solve immigration’ bollocks. But as markets tanked last week - kudos to the comms team! - it was discreetly re-launched with all-new messaging: a ‘common sense solution to everyday probs’
2/
Darren Jones, Cabinet Office secretary, put out a press release claiming the govt will be holding a ‘consultation’.
NOT: ‘Do you want the govt & unknown tech companies to have all your data?’
BUT: (I kid you not): ‘At what age should you be able to get a digital id?’ 🤔 3/
Congrats to all the news orgs that signed syndication deals with this company. You’ve licensed your journalism to be a core component of Trump’s illegal war machine. Great job everyone 👏
A special shoutout to the editor-in-chief & CEO of the Guardian, Kath Viner & Anna Bateson. The deal with OpenAI was an unforced error which legitimised OpenAI’s illegal scraping of Guardian data & IP. In exchange for a quick buck. The NYTimes, in contrast, chose to sue.
Anthropic stood up to Trump. But OpenAI has capitulated. And now all its ‘partners’ are complicit in the consequences.
That includes Guardian. It will financially benefit from its journalists’ work - inc mine - being used to support Trump’s illegal wars & ICE’s reign of terror.
PREDICTION: If Andrew is charged (no assumption of guilt etc), we are going to have a crisis of both the press & judiciary.
In Britain, it is an offence to publish ANY info on defendant beyond bare facts.
But! US outlets can print whatever they like…
1/
Contempt of court is foundational principle of British justice: press must not prejudice a jury trial.
Editors risk a prison sentence if found in breach.
Even in digital age, the law held…but how could it possibly withstand deluge of US coverage in a case like this??
3/
Short answer: it won’t. Far right agitator Tommy Robinson weaponised UK laws on contempt as a ‘cover up’ over grooming scandal. And the New Yorker ignored & published on Lucy Letby.
If Andrew is charged, it’ll trigger a crisis for both the press & judiciary
4/
NEW: Our investigation for @thenerve_news reveals not only that Peter Thiel’s Palantir is completely enmeshed in our critical national infrastructure.
It’s also the ‘cloud support’ for our nuclear weapons system 1/
Palantir’s stated mission is to defend America. Peter Thiel is a radical libertarian who does not believe ‘freedom & democracy are compatible’.
Yet, the UK is overwhelmingly dependent on Palantir’s services. As a national security threat, this is off the charts. 2/
Please read the piece with comments from tech & national security experts.
We have no national security while we rely on highly political US Silicon Valley firms that are enmeshed in Trump’s increasing fascistic administration. 3/