PolAgnostic Profile picture
Mar 4 4 tweets 1 min read
Perhaps the insanity of the Biden Admin having a Russian intermediary act as negotiator for a new Nuclear Deal with Iran at the same time Putin is threatening the use of nuclear weapons against any country that interferes in Russia's invasion of Ukraine is the cause?
Or it could be the 8+ years the CIA has directly involved itself since staging a coup for regime change in Ukraine while providing 'military contractors' (former special forces) & staging provocations intended to infuriate Russia?
I was 7 1/2 when my father came home the Titan II missile silo base he was building outside Little Rock & we watched Kennedy tell us the Russians had placed nuclear tipped missiles in Cuba. Dad had known about it for 2 weeks since the B-52's arrived at the AFB.
Now we have a worthless president with delusions of grandeur trying to stare down a former KGB colonel who views all the US & EU NATO posturing as an existential threat to Russia.

What could go wrong?

Everything.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PolAgnostic

PolAgnostic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PolAgnostic

Mar 6
1) We know Brandon stopped the transfer of the jets to the Ukraine, is blocking anyone from stopping the sales of Russian oil & refuses to let American oil production ramp up to keep costs down.

It's time for the #KamalaCoup to fix ALL these problems.

Hear me out!

She's VP &
2) certainly wants to be Prez!

She initiates 25th Amendment process, after lining up 8 from the Cabinet. (hold objections for now)

Who in the Dem Senate or House is going to fight to prove Biden IS competent?

Hell of an uphill battle, isn't it?

Harris KNOWS she's not liked.
3) But the flip side is she can CHANGE COURSE for Dems heading to a wipeout in Nov.

She can send the planes to Ukraine, block the Russian oil & order US oil to be pumped to the max.

Instantly, she's WAY more popular than Biden. Except with the most Progressive Dems & HRC.

But
Read 10 tweets
Feb 18
You obviously believe it's possible to push on a rope.

You do not understand the fragility of the global economic systems.

Do you believe it's possible to restart the engines of a plane falling out of the sky (a Hollywood favorite)?

If you do, go find someone who did it.
Liberals like Trudeau believe you can FORCE a mass of people to comply.

How has that worked out for them re: Covid?

Who will he "win over" by the drastic measures he's imposing on the protestors?

If you read my pinned thread & your take-away is the WEF wins, you didn't get it.
The WEF is literally a Death Cult. Having lots of money doesn't make someone smart. Having power doesn't mean "they're in control".

If nothing else, the 20th century proves "the smartest people in the room" always end up failing when they get their way.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 17
Let's lay out the rules for fiat currencies:

Rule #1. A govt currency is apolitical. Why? Because your currency's strength is based on NOT being affected by who is in office. Using the currency via bank accounts as a means to a drastic political end is Central bank suicide.
People at statistical mass levels will NOT believe this is a one-off action on the part of the banks.

People ESPECIALLY won't believe that when the govt has set aside due process & told the banks to "act as they see fit" and promise them they WON'T be held accountable.

Causing
All across Canada this afternoon, ATM networks started dropping like flies.

Banks are NOT required to keep their ATM machines online if they are seeing "negative trends" - i.e. suddenly a lot of people are drawing cash out in larger than usual amounts
Read 14 tweets
Jan 13, 2021
If the pipe bombs were "diversions", why weren't they exploded?

Unexploded, they're no more than distractions planted to support the narrative of a larger plot.

Anyone looking to "escalate the narrative" gets something for nothing if they're not exploded.

Pipe bombs are EZ
to build & reliable if bad people follow directions

But they are anti-personnel in nature, so why was the RNC one stashed almost behind a dumpster?

Sitting outside DC?

This whole thing looks like a set up by the Congressional leadership (who control USCP) to create an incident
1. Pipe bombs (and only two) that don't go off
2. USCP opens the doors & lets people in (that's entrapment)
3. One officer dies from a stroke AFTER returning to his office - no one noticed his injuries?
4. Another officer commits suicide that night?
5. Wrongful death of AF vet
Read 6 tweets
Feb 14, 2020
This is a "Pass" on what would be a highly technical charge.

The specific item referred to is the WSJ leak McCabe made without approval to make himself publicly look better.

Then he lied about making the leak.

Approval was required by regulation, not law.

#KnowWhenToFold
Just like Comey's classified info leak, there are charges which would require great effort to prosecute w/ a low likelihood of a conviction

Prosecutors routinely pass on these types of 'arguable' cases because it is easy to argue AGAINST something based on an internal regulation
There are sharp divisions in how courts see things

1. Anything enacted as a LAW by Act of Congress & signed by @POTUS will be given greater standing (less wiggle room) when it goes to trial

2. Anything enacted by REGULATION of part of the Executive Branch is treated as arguable
Read 10 tweets
Jan 25, 2020
Why did they impeach Trump?

There are Brad Parscale's #'s from Milwaukee rally
***
Excellent data from Milwaukee:

20,395 Voters Identified

15,738 Voters From Wisconsin

57.9% Were NOT Republicans (Yuge!)

4,313 Registrants Didn't Vote in 2016
***
This number is WHY they impeached Trump

57.9% Were NOT Republicans

10 months before the election & almost 6 out of 10 attendees are not from the candidate's party.

I've never even HEARD of numbers like that before.

Did the rally seem subdued? Nope

Was crowd enthusiastic? Yep
If you look through the numbers published after each rally, you are seeing a pattern.

A LOT of Democrats are enthusiastic about @realDonaldTrump

Across rallies > 20% of crowd

And @parscale is only showing the smallest portion of the data

In 2016, Trump's Team taught Facebook
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(