David Rothkopf Profile picture
Mar 4, 2022 15 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I'm in the middle of finishing up a book on the Trump presidency and how the courage and dedication of many career public servants and Trump political appointees kept us from much worse outcomes that Trump and his inner circle thought.
This is true from immigration to COVID to Russia/Ukraine to elections. My thesis based on 30 years of DC experience is that the vast majority of the people in most administrations are fundamentally good and genuinely seek to serve the American people and the country.
But, I will tell you something--looking at what Trump wanted to do (and often was rebuffed from doing) in retrospect is even more shocking than it was at the time. Because, particularly in international affairs, there was a pattern.
He actively wanted to pull the US out of NATO. He actively attacked the alliance. He pushed a plan to pull U.S. troops out of Europe. He pushed plans to pull U.S. troops out of Asia and the Pacific and out of the Middle East.
He effectively sought to hand Syria to the control of Russia and Russia's allies. He pulled out of arms deals that constrained the Russians. He pulled out of an Iran deal that constrained a key ally of Russia.
He pulled out of multiple international organizations and sought to actively weaken the international order that had been created to contain our enemies and promote the rule of law internationally. He tried to block aid to Ukraine. (You may remember he was impeached for that.)
He pushed to stop holding Russia accountable for 2016 election interference. He made it so hard for his staff to raise issues regarding being tough on Russia that they regularly simply by-passed him. And when they did take a tough stance there was often Hell to pay with the boss.
He celebrated Putin publicly and privately. He offered out of his own mouth Putin talking points on key issues such as Crimea "wanting" to be Russian. Even if you did not know that Putin actively tried to help him be elected (as the intel community unanimously concluded),
even if he did not surround himself with pro-Putin lackeys, even if his businesses were not swimming in Russian money, even if he did not try to block measures to make it harder for the government to stop Russian interference in 2018 and 2020, the record is clear and shocking.
The pattern of behavior is undeniable. The consequences were he to have succeeded in pushing his agenda and some of his wild ideas through would have been disastrous for the US and spectacular for Vladimir Putin. And all this was before the first attempted coup in US history.
All this was before Trump tried to blow up the very foundations of America's system and our strength. If you are a Trump supporter you will have stopped reading long ago, the "Russia Hoax" filter in your brain denying you yet again access to the facts.
But if you look at not just what Trump did but what he tried to do (before he was stopped by good patriotic Americans including many who he had appointed to high positions) and you will see that the core and the primary occupation of Trump when it came to foreign policy was...
...to weaken the U.S., to weaken our alliances, to weaken the international system and to strengthen and often defend the position of Russia. Don't take it from me in this thread. Go read the facts. To me, as I finish this book, as familiar as I am with all of it, it is shocking.
p.s. When I said at the top I was finishing up a book, I meant I was finishing up writing a book rather than reading a book. Though...you may want to read the book I'm writing...when it comes out...later this year.
p.p.s. I am a collusionist, ok? I believe Trump colluded w/the Russians to seek help getting elected. But that's NOT what is important. What's important, regardless of the reason he was actively systematically weakening us & advancing the Russian agenda, is that he was doing it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

Jun 6
It's pretty clear. Biden is standing for, believes in and still fights for the values that led Americans to the beaches of Normandy 80 years ago. And Trump and the MAGA movement oppose and seek to undermine all those values.
Trump is on the wrong side in the struggle that caused World War II. He is on the side of fascism. Of the enemy. He derogates our heroes. He seeks to undo the gains we made by winning that war. He attacks our allies and our alliances. He supports our enemies.
Trump had a book of Hitler's speeches by his bed. Trump's own cabinet members said he defended Hitler. Watching the 80th Anniversary of D-Day commemorations we should try to understand the full implications of Trump & MAGA in the context of WWII and the last century.
Read 7 tweets
May 25
In traveling through Eastern and Central Europe, the level of despair and palpable fear that Trump may return to office is off-the-charts. A Trump victory is seen as a win for Putin and the beginning of a new round of tectonic changes in the structure of Europe.
In some countries along Russia's borders or near to them, the prospect of a Trump enabled defeat in Ukraine, a weakening of NATO and tacit or explicit U.S. support for Putin and his proxies spells real trouble for democracy and the balance of influence on the continent.
Many express utter disbelief that the voters of America could make such a mistake and put so much that America has been working for during the past century in peril. I try to offer cogent reasons why a Biden victory is more likely than Trump redux.
Read 4 tweets
May 25
The mistake too many inside and out of the administration make is thinking that Netanyahu is a just a difficult ally, even a very difficult one. He is not an ally. He is, in fact, an enemy of America's goals, interests, and values as well as a political foe of President Biden.
Israel is our friend. Peace in the region is our goal. Security, self-determination and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians alike is the only way to that goal. Netanyahu, like Hamas, actively opposes that goal and seeks to make it impossible.
Hamas and Netanyahu are not the same, of course. Hamas is a terrorist organization. Netanyahu is a rogue wannabe autocrat who has with a band of extremists hijacked a democratic government and serially abused the trust of its people and its neighbors.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 13, 2023
I, for one, am a bit surprised at the general acceptance of the degree of deference that has been shown to Trump in this case. He was given far too much time and too many chances to return the documents he stole from the government.
As the subsequent seizure of the documents revealed, they were extremely sensitive in nature and put our national security at risk every moment they were held by Trump in the insecure locations he kept them or were referred to by him in meetings with visitors and associates.
Consequently, the deference could well have been deeply damaging. Similarly, if he was hiding documents at Mar-a-Lago it stands to reason some might have been at his many other residences. Why were they not searched? A normal person would not have received such a courtesy.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 11, 2023
The book on how to indict an ex-president has not been written--until now. Chapter One was by Alvin Bragg. Ch. Two was by Jack Smith, informed by Chapter One. Ch. Three, likely by Fani Willis, will be informed by the other two experiences. So by the time we get to Ch. Four...
which is probably the most consequential of the cases, about how Trump led an insurrection against the US government and a systematic effort to defraud American voters, there will be quite a lot to draw on, to help get each element right.
What is more, the shock factor will have been degraded quite a bit. The pearl clutching of Trump's supporters will be even less credible. There arguments that somehow Trump is being wronged will appear dramatically weaker (and they appear pretty darn weak now.)
Read 6 tweets
Jun 6, 2023
I regularly go through a debate in my mind about who is worse at their jobs, sports show analysts or political pundits. (You would think weather forecasters might be included in the mix, but the reality is that their predictions are vastly better than the other two groups.)
With the sports analysts, the level of BS is just shameless. Day-in and day-out they speak with great conviction, some of them banging the table or shouting at their guests or audiences, asserting they know what's going to happen next in one sports event or another.
And then when they're wrong they just move right on to a new equally certain prediction. And they do this week in and week out and they are wrong a lot. "I guarantee you Team X will sweep the series." "Of course, Team X lost game 1. The coach blew it...
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(