These are called concrete tetrapods. They are generally used for coastal erosion and wave protection, breakwaters and other coastal infrastructure, when placed on shorelines they interlock, forming a very durable and porous barrier that break up waves
Also hand (if you have the means) of creating temporary barriers on roads and tracks
Interlocking concrete 'lego' blocks are also readily available and easier to make and handle than the big tetrapods. Every village in Eastern Europe and the Baltics should have a stock of these. Instant road barriers to slow and channel enemy vehicles. Not perfect, but quick
The benefit of these over the really big concrete blocks is they can be lifted by much more common agricultural and construction plant.
Now are they perfect, of course not? But their aim is not to stop, it is to impede, make vehicle crews second guess or expend munitions to clear, or deploy scarce combat engineering units and equipment. They can also be quickly made with simple moulds
Are things like this free, no, they need resources and attention. Similar effects might be achieved by just digging up a road to create a big enough gap. But they do benefit from not requiring much maintenance and upkeep costs once in place.
Something to consider
As would IBC bulk bags filled with building materials, aggregates, stones and sand etc. Again, these are not perfect, far from it. But if they are prepositioned, not stolen in the meantime, they do provide a tick in the 'something is better than nothing' box
As I keep saying in this thread, things like this are a not a panacea, they are not free and very far from perfect. but numbers matter. Cratering charges are great, much more effective at blocking roads by making big holes in them. But they obviously require more specialists
And are you really going to proliferate these, probably not.
Hopefully, you see the point of this thread, perfect is fine, but quick, cheap and better than nothing is, well, better than nothing.
Preparedness is not just about people in green
/END
PS
Can I just make one more point, this isn't about what Ukraine should have done, it is what NATO should do. This, with much else besides
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Counter Drone Mesh for field defences and urban areas
We have all seen the images of vehicle counter UAS dropped munitions and FVP cages, and to some extent, the same evolution has happened for fixed field defences. Simple cam nets have been augmented with stronger mesh
Accepting that a mesh net of some sort is only one part of a solution, perhaps the best way to visualise the full range is to use the survivability onion. Everything from ECM to hunting down and killing the operators has a role, and so do passive measures like nets or meshes
When did Finland say to Spain, hold off on the Gibraltar nonsense lads, can't you see the bigger picture?
When did Estonia go to Dublin and ask the world's biggest defence freeloader to put a pause on the NI border pressure because Russia is five minutes over the border and we need the UK
When did Poland go to Brussels and ask the French to do something about the small boats as a gesture of solidarity with the British forces in the east of Europe
Water supply and distribution is, self-evidently, essential. Distribution is, especially, a difficult challenge. Water cannot be compressed, it is not self containing, is heavy, and can be challenging to move in bulk because of movement in the tank causing stability issues
Plastic water jerrycans can potentially be carried in a cage pallet, as with fuel (shown below), but they would require some plant to move as a pallet
To view it in simplistic terms, you can't apply any effect unless you are physically there, stand fast all you information operations and air power folks, we get it, no need to constantly bloody well go on about it.
If you want to apply any reasonable effect, you have to have vehicles, ok, ok, not you light infantry people, yes, we know you like to walk everywhere.
The more I think about the Universal Battle Trench (UBT) from @martynlmfao the more I think it is sublime in its brilliance
1
It meets the required strength and performance characteristics, a given perhaps, but still important to note. It is slighter larger to accommodate the bulkier soldier of the modern era (body armour and load carriage etc)
2
It keeps soldiers' feet off the cold and wet ground. Because it has internal bracing, there is no need for pickets and windlassed wire to support the revetment material (geotextile). Good in an urban context
Selected Precision Effects at Range ( SPEAR) Capability 3 is the name given to a Category A project (>£400m) to deliver a weapon described as
SPEAR 3 is designed to provide the UK’s F-35B fleet with a weapon for attacks against integrated air defences and other targets, exploiting its increased stand-off distance to enhance the launch aircraft’s survivability.