The rumors about the @MercedesAMGF1 being updated without a side pod and comments to @ScarbsTech mad scientist Merc drawings, showed me some explanation of the aero influence side pods have is worthwhile. So let's dig more into this #F1Tech thread.
For open wheel racers, one especially problematic geometric element is the front tires. A source of drag, and wake turbulence, the control of the front tire wake is essential for aero efficiency. A great study of this can be found below racecar-engineering.com/articles/wheel…
There are three primary turbulent structures around a rotating wheel. From the referenced study, the influence of the front wing can not be ignored, so the results presented are generally present but can be different as teams design the front wings differently. #F1Tech
At 1 Diameter downstream, we can see the counter rotating vortex pair. We also see the tendency of the tire wake to be pulled inboard towards the floor, and venturi tunnels which is not ideal. #F1Tech
So what's new? Tire wake is not new, but how teams manage it is for 2022. In previous years teams would use a system of barge boards to straighten and deflect the incoming air conditioning it for their aero package. #F1Tech
For 2022 regulations have essentially eliminated the barge board in it's old forms because it created massive wake profiles. In an effort to clean up the wake for following cars, teams now how to decide how to manage this front tire wake. #F1Tech
Although barge boards are not present, Some teams are using bluff side pods to create outwash that helps to push this front tire wake outward. Different teams employ different methods, but the concept is similar.
📸 @SportmphMarkformula1.com/en/latest/arti…
The aero tradoff can come in the form of additional form drag from the bluff side pod. However, trade-offs must be made as front tire wake not deflected can significantly increase drag on the rear tire as well. #F1Tech
Teams are also employing different designs for the outboard floor strakes to try and protect these venturi tunnels from dirty air. I see this as an area of innovation as the year goes on. #F1Tech
There are a host of other reasons mechanically and structurally for side pods, but I hope this aero influence review helps you to see what role they play as well. Further reading can be found at the references below. #F1Tech
People often ask me, "where can I find great information on motorsports and aerodynamics?" So how about a thread of some of my favorites? And no, I don't get paid to endorse these. I just think F1 Tech is a great place to share knowledge! Also, this is NOT an exhaustive list, but some that stick out to me. Feel free to add yours as well below!
Video below by Vyssion and JJN.
Let's start with some of my favorite books on car aerodynamics! "Race Car Aerodynamics: Designing for Speed" by Joseph Katz is goated. A really great book covering all types of race cars and written for anyone at any level. I highly recommend this book.
Another book that is sort of an extension of Katz is one from Simon McBeath called "Competition Car Aerodynamics." It's like a newer version of Katz book, and with a bit of very simple CFD in it as well.
Is the RB20 great? Or is Max Verstappen + the RB20 great? I spent some of the weekend looking through the telemetry. And here is what I have found. In summary, Max Verstappen is a Swiss f*cking watch. Well, maybe a Dutch watch. Let's look at it in this thread.
Looking at the macro view level lap times to gage consistency, you can see that it's incredibly consistent irrespective of compoud. Credit to Checo as well, his lap times in Bahrain were also very consistent, but also consistently 5-tenths to 1 second slower per lap. But why?
Looking over the a single lap, many show similar characteristics. It's like death by a thousand paper cuts, or in this case by 15 corners. The intricacy and precision of driving from one corner to the next builds delta from corner to corner.
Was the RB19 of MV really slow on the straights compared to the other teams? Or was something else going on? We know that MV wasn't fortunate to gain any DRS or slipstream after passing LN, but what else was going on? Let's understand this more in the thread below. 🧵
If we look first at the pit straight into Turns 1 and 2, comparing LN and MV, we see something peculiar. MV never upshifts to 8th gear, but holds 7th. Thus, his engine RPM is higher and he doesn't lift into T1. He does, however, lose time slightly to LN due to the lower speed. 🧵
Looking at the onboards, LN is 1.336s behind MV so he may catch a very slight tow, but the top speed delta here is 4kph with LN reaching 300kph. By MV never upshifting to 8th gear he limits his T1 entry speed, but doesn't have to lift as a result. 🧵
Well that helps to solve that mystery. Had also heard that this plank was painted so they could observe the wear patterns better. Looking at this, the plank wear is quite low overall. How about a thread comparing my observations of the RB, Merc, and Ferrari wear patterns.🧵
The bib looks to be running quite low. Possibly some forward rake, as most suspect. RB is able to run their forward floor very low, and still ride curbs and manage bump tracks like Monaco. A bit more left sided mid wear. 🧵
Mid floor looks pretty stable with little wear. Same preferential left side wear from previous image along the length of the mid floor. No floor flexing going on here. 😉 🧵
There is a quote in here that perfectly summarizes what I have been trying to say about the complexity seeing an image of a floor, and then getting a floor to work well.
"Talking to an engineer from the Milton Keynes team, not too worried about the photographs taken of their.."
"..underbody in Montecarlo, he explained to us that it is easier to work on the cross section of the channels while the slope (height) variation part inside is much more complicated to the tunnel and the simultaneous generation of eddies; an infinite job, among other things.."
".., since a car never works with a constant height but has many external elements, such as bumps, and dynamics, such as roll, pitch, etc., which greatly complicate the design of what it is the most important aerodynamic component of these new F1 cars..."
Ok so I had questions like many about the legality of the new @MercedesAMGF1#W14b spec floor winglet. With the help of some friends, I did a bit of digging into the regulations to understand this better. A 🧵@Formula_Nerds@AlbertFabrega
The regulation boxes are sometimes super confusing so it's best to start with an overview of them. The below link is a good place to start to understand the regulation boxes where engineers can design within. Each reg box is controlled differently. 🧵racecar-engineering.com/articles/tech-…
So after looking at the reg boxes, these aero features can only be in these potential volumes, Front Chassis, Mid Chassis, Floor body, Floor fence, or Rear Body Work Sidepod. So now lets eliminate them 1 by 1. First it can't be fence, because these aren't floor fences 🧵