Post

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

@VerigoKennLove

More from @PaulaCBlades17

💕 Paula C Blades 💕🙏🏻🕊️

@PaulaCBlades17

Dec 15

Originally The UN 2030 Sustainable Development Program was unanimously adopted by all 193 UN member states, including Canada, at the UN Sustainable Development Summit in New York on September 25-27, 2015.

“Harper did not personally attend” the summit—sources describe him as “hesitant” about the process—but Canada was represented by “Christian Paradis”, then-Minister of International Development and La Francophonie, who delivered a statement on behalf of the country during an interactive dialogue on ending poverty and hunger.

It’s well known that Harper was Hestitant about the UN’s Sustainable Developments Program (Agenda 2030).

Unfortunately, Harper LOST the election right afterwards & wasn’t in power for the official implementation of Agenda 2030.
That was Justin Trudeau.

Pierre Poilievre does not support the UN’s Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development or its associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). While there is no record of a direct parliamentary vote on Agenda 2030 itself—Poilievre has consistently opposed key policies aligned with its objectives, especially those related to climate action (SDG 13), clean energy (SDG 7), and sustainable economic growth (SDG 8).
During his 20+ years as an MP, including his time in Harper’s cabinet, Poilievre has voted against environmental and climate measures over 400 times, supporting such initiatives only 13 times.

For example, in September 2025, he voted in favor of a Conservative opposition motion criticizing an oil and gas emissions cap, which aligns with his party’s push to prioritize fossil fuels over stringent emission reductions.

His platform includes pledges to scrap the carbon tax, eliminate green subsidies, and invigorate the oil and gas sector, positions that directly contradict Agenda 2030’s emphasis on transitioning to sustainable energy and reducing inequalities through environmental regulations.
Poilievre has also faced criticism for allegedly feigning ignorance about the SDGs.

No public statements or posts from Poilievre directly supporting Agenda 2030 were found in searches of his social media or official records.

Poilievre does not support the WEF either.

1./ You don’t know how all this works? Allow me to educate you, @nualanichols!!! 😁

Yes, Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Government Implemented Agenda 2030 in Canada, not Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government.

Agenda 2030 in of itself is a “non-binding” global framework that was adopted unanimously by ALL UN member states in September 2015.

👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
“ADOPTION IS NON-BINDING”
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻

“Making Agenda 2030official” in Canada involved integrating it into domestic policy via government-led initiatives rather than new legislation or parliamentary ratification.

x.com/nualanichols/s…
Archive: archive.fo/lLOcp

Continued…

Read 11 tweets

💕 Paula C Blades 💕🙏🏻🕊️

@PaulaCBlades17

Dec 15

Lets shred this thread!!! 🧵🪡

1./ Your thread (from May 2024) makes several claims about Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) supporting “globalist agendas” tied to organizations like the UN (e.g., Habitat III, New Urban Agenda), the World Economic Forum (WEF), C40 Cities, the Century Initiative, and related policies on housing, immigration, and urban development.

Based on a review of official CPC policies, Poilievre’s public statements, and recent developments (up to December 2025), the evidence largely contradicts this thread’s portrayal of CPC support for these agendas. Poilievre and the CPC have positioned themselves as critics of “globalist” influences like the WEF, UN-driven urban agendas, and mass immigration schemes. However, there are some policy overlaps in practical urban planning (e.g., increasing housing density near transit), which the thread frames as “globalist” but are common in Canadian policy debates across parties.

I’ll break this down by key claims from the thread, with evidence from CPC sources, Poilievre’s statements, and third-party reporting.

👉🏻x.com/greg_scott84/s…
👉🏻threadreaderapp.com/thread/1788675…
Archive: archive.fo/WL5mw

Continued…

2./
Housing Policies and the Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF)

• Thread Claims (Posts 2-7, 9-10): Accuses the CPC of “echoing” Liberal housing strategies, using the HAF to fund municipal housing, mandating volume/timeframe targets under penalty, and supporting densification/transit-oriented development as part of the UN’s New Urban Agenda.

• Actual CPC Position: The CPC opposes the HAF and vows to scrap it, criticizing it as ineffective bureaucracy that doesn’t lead to actual housing construction. Their “Building Homes, Not Bureaucracy” plan (announced in 2023 and reiterated in 2025) focuses on cutting red tape, fining slow municipalities, and tying federal infrastructure funding to housing starts—without relying on the HAF or UN frameworks.

• Poilievre has barred CPC MPs from promoting HAF deals in their ridings, calling it a “waste” that funds bureaucracy instead of homes. For example, in November 2024, he criticized it for not delivering results, and in December 2024, he doubled down on ending it if elected.

• On densification and transit-oriented development: The CPC plan does support “pre-approving high-density housing around transit stations” to speed up builds, which aligns with efficient urban planning. However, this is framed domestically as a way to “remove gatekeepers” and build more homes affordably, not as endorsement of UN agendas like Habitat III. No CPC documents or statements reference the New Urban Agenda or UN Habitat III as guiding principles.

• CPC targets: They aim for 2.3 million new homes in five years by penalizing municipalities that block permits, but this is positioned as anti-bureaucracy, not globalist. Recent CPC platform updates (April 2025) emphasize redirecting HAF funds to GST breaks for developers on homes under $1 million, explicitly cutting Liberal programs.
No evidence of CPC support for the HAF or UN urban agendas; in fact, they actively oppose them as “Liberal failures.”

👉🏻x.com/greg_scott84/s…
👉🏻threadreaderapp.com/thread/1788675…
Archive: archive.fo/WL5mw

Continued…

3./ Transit-Oriented Development and 15-Minute Cities (Posts 7-8, 18-22)

• Thread Claims: Links CPC housing wording to “transit-oriented development” as a gateway to 15-Minute Cities, tied to C40 Cities, Rockefeller Foundation, and Agenda 2030—implying it’s part of a “one-world” structure with restrictions on meat, cars, and clothing.

• Actual CPC Position: While the CPC supports denser housing near transit to address affordability (as noted above), they do not endorse 15-Minute Cities or C40’s extreme targets (e.g., zero meat/dairy, no private vehicles). Poilievre has not mentioned 15-Minute Cities positively; CPC rhetoric focuses on “common sense” policies like axing carbon taxes (which they link to globalist overreach) and promoting car-friendly infrastructure.

• No CPC ties to C40 Cities or Rockefeller initiatives in their platforms or Poilievre’s statements. Environmental pledges (e.g., in 2025 election questionnaires) from the CPC emphasize domestic conservation without referencing UN agendas.

• Poilievre’s anti-WEF stance (see below) extends to criticizing “radical woke agendas” from global forums, which indirectly opposes C40-style restrictions.

The thread overstates this as “globalist” support; transit-oriented development is a bipartisan urban planning tool in Canada, not inherently tied to UN control.

👉🏻x.com/greg_scott84/s…
👉🏻threadreaderapp.com/thread/1788675…
Archive: archive.fo/WL5mw

Continued…

Read 6 tweets

💕 Paula C Blades 💕🙏🏻🕊️

@PaulaCBlades17

Aug 2

PART ONE - “HOW THEY DID IT!
How To Facilitate The Depopulation Of The World In Secret!
OMG This is HUGE!”

@JovanHPulitzer Ask AI Series Part 1

“If I were a devious global bad actor and I wanted to slowly reduce the human population of the planet, but wanted to have it done slowly so as not to be discovered and detectable, what are the steps I would take significantly decrease the population of the whole planet?”

👉🏻rumble.com/v6wqxe6-how-th…
👉🏻x.com/jovanhpulitzer…

PART TWO - “How To Facilitate The Depopulation OF The World By Infiltrating Food & Drug Agencies”

@JovanHPulitzer Ask AI Series Part 2

👉🏻rumble.com/v6wqzig-part-t…
👉🏻x.com/jovanhpulitzer…

PART THREE - “Depopulation of the World through Environmental and Biological Engineering”

@JovanHPulitzer Ask AI Series Part 3

👉🏻rumble.com/v6wkh8y-p3-dep…
👉🏻x.com/jovanhpulitzer…

Read 6 tweets

💕 Paula C Blades 💕🙏🏻🕊️

@PaulaCBlades17

May 24

@Uncle_MannyEO @PepelianAnonius @17thSCOG @Ansgar_3 Yeah… @thejimwatkins & @ABCU_8 coming forth with the truth about Q not being Military, should be a sobering fact for everyone…

x.com/briangamble_v1…

@Uncle_MannyEO @PepelianAnonius @17thSCOG @Ansgar_3 @thejimwatkins @ABCU_8 Thank-you!!! @briangamble_v1 🙏🏻
It’s a blessing to have friends with this type of knowledge!!! 💥👊🏻
👉🏻x.com/briangamble_v1…. x.com/briangamble_v1…

x.com/genflynn/statu…

@Uncle_MannyEO @PepelianAnonius @17thSCOG @Ansgar_3 @thejimwatkins @ABCU_8 @briangamble_v1 It looks as though @GenFlynn has known for a very long time, that Q was a Psyop. He even suggested that it was a CIA disinformation campaign.
👉🏻x.com/genflynn/statu…
Archive: archive.fo/f0WfX
web.archive.org/web/2022011317… x.com/genflynn/statu…

Read 8 tweets

💕 Paula C Blades 💕🙏🏻🕊️

@PaulaCBlades17

May 20

No… MTB atacked us & was spaming threads & I was kind, supportive & respectful to him but he went all weird…
He accused me of attacking people.
I HAVE NOT.
Then he threatened “TWICE” so I told him to go fuck himself.
MTB is an arrogant, egotistical, abusive Asshole.
This is how it started…
👉🏻x.com/paulacblades17…
Go through the thread yourself
1.

2/ And this is how it ended….
👉🏻x.com/paulacblades17…
And I’ve been blocking asshats all day because I don’t want the Chaos/Noise.
I personally, did not attacked anyone. But I was unfollowed by & mocked by Q supporters, that I thought were my friend, for supporting the information from both sides…

Today I know who my true friends are, and I know who are here to cause trouble; AND they to can kindly go fuck themselves AS WELL…

Go Look for yourself…

3/ I’ll never speak to many over this bullshit, especially @realMrTruthBomb ever again for behaving this way towards myself & others…
👉🏻x.com/paulacblades17…

I did nothing to anyone!!!

Those who want to support these Assholes, their behaviours or put public calls out for others to Target & Harass me or my friends will get blocked too.

Peace Out ✌🏻

Read 4 tweets

💕 Paula C Blades 💕🙏🏻🕊️

@PaulaCBlades17

Mar 13

💥…AND BOOM!!! 💥 🎤🫳🏻

@annvandersteel, I really do wonder why @realMaryFanning wasn’t sued?!!?

AND wouldn’t this be a conflict of interest, with Mary Fanning’s husband, Dennis Kirchhofer, being a partner at the very Law Firm that represented Dominion (Voting Machines) against @realMikeLindell?!!? 🤔

Didn’t Mary Fanny tell America that the Dominion Voting Machines had Vulnerabilities?!!? 🤔

Is it just me or does this look like a Set-up?!!? 🤔

I also wonder if Mr. Kirchhofer knew William Barr &/or Alexander Acosta
during their time spent at Kirkland & Ellis?!!? 🤔

👉🏻 x.com/annvandersteel…
Archive: archive.fo/Ll3l6
#HammerScorecard @realMikeLindell @SidneyPowell1 @GenFlynn @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash

THIS WEEK ON MARY FANNING’S “HAMMER NARRATIVE TURNS” ⏳

👉🏻 Why is @realMaryFanning defending Conan Hayes?!!? 🤔

👉🏻Why was Conan Hayes Working & Living with Dennis Montgomery?!!?

👉🏻Did they collectively set up #TinaPeters?!!? 🤔

👉🏻Are/Were the Feds Involved with both Conan Hayes & Dennis Montgomery?!!?

👉🏻Did China ‘allegedly’ duplicate
Dennis Montgomery’s Hammer/Scorecard Source Codes?!??

👉🏻Did Montgomery sneak an identifier within Hammers Source Code?!!? 🫠

👉🏻AND THE BIG ONE… Where did those PESKY LIDDLE PCAPS disappeared to, anyhow?!!? 🥴

👉🏻Enter ‘Raspberry Pi’ Land!??! 🥧💨

👉🏻Was Dennis Montgomery & the FBI also involved with the Pandemic?!!?

👉🏻I wonder if Montgomery slipped a sneaky liddle identifier into the Wuhan Virus too?!!? 🤪

👉🏻What does investigator, Mike Zullo have to say about all this?!

👉🏻Mary, Mary why you buggin’?
🐞 🐜 🦟 🪲 🪳 🕷️💃🕺
youtu.be/QgmyVLheqkQ?si…

👉🏻x.com/paulacblades17…
👉🏻threadreaderapp.com/thread/1898409…
Archive: archive.fo/nCB4B

#TrustMeBro🥴#HonkHonk 🤡

THIS WEEK ON MARY FANNING’S
“HAMMER NARRATIVE TURNS”⏳

Part 2:

👉🏻 Conan Hayes is suddenly a Good Guy because he was working & living with Dennis Montgomery, @realMaryFanning?!!? 🤔

👉🏻 Isn’t Mary Fanning’s husband a partner at the very Law Firm that Sued Mike Lindell & @SidneyPowell1 on behalf of Dominion Voting Sysyems?!!? 🫠
👉🏻x.com/paulacblades17…
Archive: archive.fo/Iaz5L

👉🏻Suddenly Mike Lindell is bad?!!? (March 8th?) 😵‍💫 @WattersMarty

👉🏻One week later, Tina Peters turns on @realMikeLindell?!!?

👉🏻Is anyone whispering in #TinaPeters ear?!!? 🤔

👉🏻 Were Conan Hayes & Dennis Montgomery part of a Psyop used to intentionally messed up 2020 Election Fraud Court Cases?!!? 😬

#HammerScorecard🤥
#TrustMeBro🤡
#HonkHonk🤡
👉🏻x.com/paulacblades17…
Archive: archive.fo/NVR6z