Jason Kint Profile picture
Mar 9, 2022 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
ok, incoming... Updated antitrust complaint vs Facebook just posted including 110 unsealed pages. This is the suit FB failed to dismiss - pinned to its bad data practices. Redlines are new, I'll hit on what I see as the key new allegations and discovery evidence (so far). /1
Most importantly, it adds three massive sections alleging anticompetitive behavior in three business critical categories of data (location, commerce, video) with three respective companies - Foursquare, eBay and Netflix - including conflicts of interests in the deals. /2
it also intros term "Data Targeting Barrier to Entry" as it systematically walks through how critically important surveillance is to Facebook. FB uses the term "signal" - this came up A LOT on last earnings call regarding privacy - leading to its $1/4 trillion drop in value. /3
Lawsuit alleges how Facebook announced new entries into each of three categories (Marketplace, Locations, Watch) and used FB's market threat to get more reciprocal data from the three companies. It notes Netflix CEO was also Chair of Governance and Compensation Cmte for FB. /4
In terms of reciprocity, it's long been reported Facebook whitelisted companies after it shut down its APIs based on business needs and data reciprocity but there is a significant amount of new allegations in the lawsuit regarding its Events API and "extended whitelisting." /5
Probably the most troubling of all is the new discovery on Onavo - the VPN software Facebook acquired - claiming "Facebook had built the largest real-time surveillance system in existence" - including allegations they could spy on content of messages and media. More on this... /6
Here is email from a FB executive explaining how sophisticated Onavo was for spying - reminder FTC and state AGs also allege Instagram and WhatsApp acquisitions were accelerated based on this spying. Also, a reminder Apple and Google had to boot FB's Onavo out of app stores. /7
This could be an entire thread: 1) alleges FB fed personal data from Onavo into Hive (its massive data repository now under discovery orders in another lawsuit), 2) Guy Rosen, who sold Onavo to FB, is "head of integrity" for FB. Think about the leadership making this decision. /8
Lastly, includes many unsealed pages on how merging of back-end of FB apps - an obvious attempt to hinder antitrust breakup - was pitched/bought in press using a smokescreen of encryption which should have been unrelated but would move public debate to security vs privacy. /9
Added to the back and unsealed are Sherman Section 1 allegations between Facebook and Netflix, eBay in addition to Google. Note, the allegations of Facebook and Google rigging market are also a significant part of this suit but not new so I'm skipping in this thread. /10
Here is the case. Document 244 which posted overnight is Facebook's motion to keep redacted certain info but includes both the Amended Complaint and a redlined version with again 110+ pages now unsealed. /11
And a reminder, these are plaintiff allegations. Although a lot of the complaint is on-brand and consistent with facts we've learned in other unsealed lawsuits, press reports and includes some apparently new discovery, we'll need to see how this plays out. Thanks. /eof
This is the previous thread on this lawsuit. Again, the most important new allegations would be Facebook striking deals with category leads to back off in markets (eg pro video where it was to invest $1B) in return for increasing barriers to entry on ad targeting and $ from it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

Nov 30
So many mind blowing sentences in this just incredible Wall Street Journal report. Starting here, “Witkoff, who hasn’t traveled to Ukraine this year, is set to visit Russia for the sixth time next week and will again meet Putin. He insisted he isn’t playing favorites.” /1
“Inside were details of the commercial and
economic plans the Trump administration had been pursuing with Russia, including jointly mining rare earths in the Arctic.” /2 Image
“European official asked Witkoff to start speaking with allies over the secure fixed line Europe's heads of state use to conduct sensitive
diplomatic conversations. Witkoff demurred, as he traveled too much to use the cumbersome system.” /3
Read 5 tweets
Oct 19
Saturday’s “No Kings” protests have filled front pages across America with impactful visuals and headlines of peaceful protests. Many included the eye popping NYC Times Square shot. Here in the Dothan Eagle (Alabama). But everyone turned out. See Montana in its Missoulian. /1 Image
Image
Plenty of big city energy from St. Louis, Missouri to Chicago, Illinois. /2 Image
Image
Midwest with Cleveland, Ohio to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. /3 Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Sep 24
US v Google remedies: Nothing groundbreaking from return of DOJ’s star economist this morning. Court tested if his concerns over solely behavioral remedies assume distrust in Google (won’t follow court orders). I don’t think it mattered relative to where we were last night... /1
Yes, some will read as leaning against structural-remedy interest. I took it simply her clarifying she doesn’t need to lean on distrust if structural is shown tech feasible. Although witness pointed out distrust harms competition investment levels. /2
Court also very much nodded head when witness Lee explained why he didn’t do “but for” analysis to a dollar amount. Mehta also determined in search it was infeasible and unnecessary so cross that out of Google’s defense imho. /3
Read 6 tweets
Sep 14
ok, this is HUGE. Late Friday, Penske (PMC) filed a wicked-smart, landmark antitrust lawsuit against Google. I've now read it in full and I'm very impressed. Importantly, it's the first antitrust suit for Google tying its AI-driven products to its adjudicated search monopoly. /1 Image
The core claim: Google is abusing its search monopoly to force pubs to hand over content - not just for traditional search indexing but to feed its AI. Google then repurposes it to substitute them with its own services breaking the fundamental bargain of the open web. /2 Image
Penske says this is not a fair exchange. If it weren't for Google's adjudicated monopoly power (recall Judge Mehta said they get 19x as many queries as next biggest), Google would be paying pubs for these rights or if it didn't then they would opt-out of providing them. /3 Image
Read 16 tweets
Sep 6
OK all ye people depressed Judge Mehta didn't order Google broken into bits this week. I'm here to cheer you up. DOJ has its other remedies trial in 16 days and just posted its PFJ (Proposed Final Remedies) now 60+ pages of brilliant detail. Let me walk you through key terms. /1 Image
This is the 2023 US v Google adtech win - the one DCN and its premium publishers have long been much more deep and focused on. Here’s what it means for publishers of all types - and why it will be a massive win for the open web if Judge Brinkema signs on (I believe she will). /2 Image
First, clear structural remedies. Google must divest AdX, its ad exchange, w/in 2yrs and likely DFP, its publisher ad server. No more vertical ad stack monopoly with interest conflicts. This would finally decouple tools Google can use to rig auctions and suppress pub revenues. /3 Image
Read 14 tweets
Sep 5
All eyes at Google on streaming NFL game tonight but Google Inc and its many monopolies have had quite the week. I’ve been absorbing on this end, some quick Friday thoughts on things missed. Bad news certainly for the public, and also DCN members, in US v Google Search case. /1
Judge Mehta said "no thanks" to helping publishers - because he said no pubs testified. Maybe that’s what retaliation fear looks like??? He also noted the unlawful conduct was about distribution deals, not deals with publishers. More on that in a minute. /2
Despite Mehta finding Google illegally maintained its 95%+ search monopoly with browser deals, he also said it’s OK for Google to keep owning Chrome - the world’s biggest browser - so they can keep paying everyone else and free riding on their own browser. All bad here. /3
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(