Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Mar 9, 2022 18 tweets 4 min read Read on X
And we're back to Whitmer trial after break so both sides can prepare for FBI entrapment defense.

Judge tells jury he hoped to put off entrapment issues until after DOJ rested but it's not possible to "segment" the argument. Defense, prosecutor will present new opening arguments
Whooo boy. Croft atty not holding back. "The FBI is supposed to protect us and protect our rights. They are not supposed punish people who say mean things about them. We expect the FBI to use responsible tactics."

Croft was criticizing FBI on Facebook in 2017, made him a target
Blanchard, Croft atty, now blasting CHS Steve as a longtime criminal who committed crimes in 9 states.

CHS Steve was "plying guys with drugs" at every event. "Out of their minds stoned." Violates FBI rules.

FBI ignored CHS Steve behavior. Also selectively record defendants.
FBI ignored CHS Steve "breaking the rules." (Defense asked last week for all records related to FBI admonishments to CHSs. Judge denied for now.)

Blanchard erroneously says Dublin, OH outside of Cleveland. It's outside Columbus.

When high, CHS Steve got everyone "whipped up."
Blanchard explains that FBI agents immediately decided this would be a "TEI" case, terrorism enterprise investigation. One agent told his boss (D'Antuono?) that he'd work it that way with or without his approval.

CHSs purchased hotel rooms for defendants before recon trip.
Gets in truck driven by CHS Dan and filled with other CHSs, FBI UCE

"At every step, FBI had good reason to close the case."

FBI should have closed CHS Steve as source when he smoked pot with targets.

"This was stoned crazy talk, not a plan."
Blanchard going thru Croft's outlandish remarks including talk of "barking" outside Whitmer's cottage.

Lol, they talked about flying her on a kite over the lake. "That's not how kites work."

I wish I could see the faces of the jurors.

"You can't prosecute someone for talking."
"We expect better from our government. You can tell the FBI it's not ok to prosecute people they are angry with or who run their mouth."

Gibbons (Fox atty) up again: "Adam Fox would protest" when CHS Dan came to vacuum shop to entice Fox into kidnapping plot.

CHS Dan paid $64k!
sometimes receiving "envelopes of cash" by the FBI.

Gibbons now detailing CHS Dan's involvement including comms with FBI handlers. (Those agents also will not testify for government nor will FBI special agent in charge. He was fired after assaulting his wife last summer.)
"It's the government moving all of it."

Atty Julia Kelly up, reiterating CHS Dan's contact with her client, Daniel Harris. CHS Dan calls handler in May 2020, says there is "no plan" btw defendants. But CHS Dan kept pushing Adam Fox to other defendants.

DOJ up.
AUSA explains entrapment is a legal standard not based on "feeling or ideas."

Calls first witness: FBI special agent Todd Ronick (sp)

He's worked on domestic terror cases since 2014 specifically militia movement.

AUSA asks how FBI decides to open cases. Mostly "tips," he says.
He says someone walked into FBI office with a tip about Wolverine Watchmen. Showing exhibits to identify defendants.

Now explaining CHSs: Could be someone who provides info to us, someone we recruit in an organization.

Someone could be in trouble and offer to help?

Yes.
Could someone do it for money?
Yes.
Now discussing "admonishments" given to CHSs.

I'll post this blistering 2019 report by IG Horowitz on FBIs lousy record of vetting, tracking informants:

oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/a…
CHSs "sometimes they have to pretend to be criminals."

UCE is an employee of the FBI, usually a special agent.

"They have to look different" if they're going to infiltrate a group. Sounds like they're prepping jury to see unconventional FBI UCEs "Mark" and "Red."
Confirms CHS Dan had access to group's encrypted chats--gave FBI access to those accounts.

Confirms FBI can get search warrants for info on social media accounts. (This happens repeatedly in J6 cases)

Now presenting evidence to jury off defendants' accounts. (Can't see it)
Now playing profane videos by Fox on Facebook, talking about boogaloo movement. "Get ready."

FBI says boogaloo wants to start second civil war. They wear Hawaiian shirts (!) apparently.

Now says their references to 1776 is somehow indicative of second civil war
Plays video of Fox saying 435 members of Congress don't "give a f*ck about us."

Where's the lie? Wonder how the jury will take that.

Shows photo of Fox wearing Hawaiian shirt at lockdown rally, someone screaming "F the government."

Lots of posts, chat related to lockdown anger
Ok back and forth between Fox and Croft with hot talk about taking down governors and tyrants bc of lockdowns.

Now talking about June 2020 meeting in Ohio organized by CHS Steve.

FBI agent says meeting was about "uniting the militias," says Fox then started recruiting members

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julie_kelly2

Feb 9
Hearing about to get underway in the courtroom of Judge Jeb Boasberg, who continues to escalate his personal grudge against the Trump administration by demanding "due process" proceedings for 130+ illegal Venezuelans deported under the Alien Enemies Act.

Boasberg, despite being bench slapped by SCOTUS and DC circuit in the matter, now wants to know how the DOJ will arrange "virtual" hearings for the illegals, now back in their home country of Venezuela, or return them to the US including making flight arrangements.
ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt: The illegals in Venezuela should be permitted to file a paper report related to their "due process" claims. Those in third party countries should be allowed to demand virtual hearings.

"No matter what we propose, the government opposes it." No duh.

Boasberg wants to know how many AEA subjects have left Venezuela. Gelernt says a "handful."

"The people who made it out of Venezuela want to clear their name," Gelernt says. Boasberg asks if any have presented at port of entry--he is now suggesting that should be the case.

"We know people who would come back." NO THANKS
"I don't see anything the government is offering. There are some who want to come back and seek asylum. If the only option is to come back, that's what they will take," Gelernt says.

Gelernt tips his hand as to next step: get illegals' designation as Alien Enemies Act subject and/or a member of Tren de Aragua (a foreign terrorist organization) lifted so they can seek asylum.

"If they prevail, they would pursue regular immigration proceedings and seek asylum." This is what both Gelernt and Boasberg want as the outcome.

Boasberg asks Gelernt about how the US government could facilitate the return of the illegal Venezuelans. Boasberg: "Would you request a government plane?" LMAO

Boasberg continues his role as de facto ACLU attorney--prompting Gelernt to explain how the AEA itself based on the TdA designation of the illegals is baseless. (This entire question is now before the 5th Circuit Court--oral arguments held last month. Headed to SCOTUS.)

"It's just dumb," Boasberg says of the nature of the president's AEA proclamation using TdA as justification to immediately remove illegal Venezuelans.

"Nothing suprises me in this case," Boasberg snarks, "but it would not suprise me if none are Tda members."

Boasberg is pushing Gelernt to demand of the government more specific evidence of TdA association for those removed. Now discussing the use of tatoos--Gelernt says the illegals "are so far removed" from TdA and that TdA does not use tatoos to identify gang members.

Boasberg asks about political climate in Venezuala and whether the illegals are still afraid/targeted by the government post-Maduro. Gelernt says his clients are still afraid.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 31
So I decided to burn up my PACER account and do random checks on Judge Patrick Schlitz's claims that ICE violated 96 court orders in Minnesota immigration cases this month alone.

"ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence," Schlitz, without evidence, wrote in a court order this week.

Well--his very first citation does not exist. There is no Jan 24, 2026 court order in Hakan v Noem. There is a Dec. 24, 2025 court order (hard to tell exactly what was "violated" in the judge's order) but Schlitz just misrepresented this case in his own court orderImage
Image
It is very important to note that Minnesota judges have uniformly ordered the immediate release of ALL illegals who have filed habeas petitions. I believe the last court was 60+.

In the process, judges impose unreasonable time limits on the DOJ to respond to petitions then release the illegals claiming the administration did not reply in time.

A total racket.

Now let's turn to Francisco E.O. v. Olson and the cited order that Schlitz claims represents ICE's violation of court orders in Jan 2026.

Would be nice to read it--BUT IT IS SEALED.

Schlitz knows that most habeas docs are sealed so it's impossible for the public to judge for themselves the nature of the judge's accusations.

The docket does, however, reflect some back and forth between this judge and Pam Bondi, resulting in the judge on Jan 29 saying--"although the Respondents willfully violated the Court's Orders [again, we have no idea what this magistrate judge claims in the sealed order], the Court appreciates Respondents' counsel's communication and their efforts to promote Respondents' compliance with the Court's directives. The Court therefore declines to impose any sanctions. This matter therefore shall be closed."Image
OOPS actually--Schlitz in his haste to put together this appendix claiming ICE violated more court orders in Jan 2026 than some federal agencies violate in their entire history (LOL), he double counted the same order.

So out of the 1st 7 cases Schlitz listed--one does not exist and another is counted twice.Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 23
A few things to note here:

> Jack Smith not only pushed for an unreasonable trial date of Jan 2024, he asked the Supreme Court to take the “extraordinary” step of bypassing the DC appellate court in deciding on Judge Chutkan’s immunity order, which denied all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. (SCOTUS said no.)

> When Trump’s defense lawyer objected to the hasty trial date due to the massive amount of discovery discussed here, Judge Chutkan said the president should have been reviewing discovery BEFORE the indictment, referring to Jan 6 committee materials. Chutkan something to the effect of, “you knew you were going to be charged you should have prepared ahead of time.”
In his application for cert before SCOTUS, Smith called his J6 indictment against the president an “extraordinary case.” Having Chutkan rule on the unprecedented question of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution in just 7 weeks; oral arguments set by DC appellate 5 weeks later; and DC appellate court opinion upholding Chutkan issued 4 weeks after that was not quick enough for Smith.

In fact, Justice Roberts criticized Chutkan and the appellate court judges for their rush to judgment in such an historic matter.

Smith, as usual, lied about why he sought a hasty trial schedule.Image
This is just a taste of what the president and his lawyers had to deal with before Judge Chutkan.

She spent several minutes arguing with attorney John Lauro about the trial date and voluminous discovery. Not only did Chutkan say repeatedly—you knew this indictment was coming—she suggested he was a bad lawyer for not reading not yet produced discovery before the indictment.

This is from the hearing held 4 weeks after Smith announced the J6 indictment:Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 22
Chairman Jim Jordan opens Jack Smith hearing with overview of Russiagate, various prosecutions of President Trump, and an account of Smith's unprecedented two criminal indictments against the president.

Notes that Judge Cannon disqualified Smith under the Appointments Clause and how he successfully pushed (thanks to Judge Chutkan) to release a report on the Jan 6 case after the election.
Oh FFS Jamie Raskin opens his statement by acknowledging the attendance of the 4 J6 celeb cops including Mike Fanone and Harry Dunn.

It is truly unfortunate those lying clowns haven't been charged with perjury.

Raskin now swooning over Smith's resume--I am sure he will omit SCOTUS' 8-0 reversal of Smith's case against the McDonnells.
Raskin calls Judge Cannon a "sychophant" for not permitting the release of Smith's report on the documents case. Raskin claims Smith cannot talk about the docs case due to those orders however Smith has already openly talked about the case.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6
Sen. Rand Paul just published records showing the FBI's two-year surveillance of an American citizen suspected of entering the Capitol on Jan 6. The spying included physical surveillance of her home and movements; she, like thousands of others were placed on a TSA "terror" watch list...Image
Christine Crowder is a Catholic school teacher and her husband a federal air marshal. Paul released 70 pages of docs related to the FBI's full throated investigation into an innocent American.

Just imagine how many times this happened--and not just to J6ers--under Chris Wray: Image
Outrageously--DC US Attorney Matt Graves wanted to pursue a criminal prosecution of Crowder DESPITE the FBI finally admitting it did not have enough evidence to bring a case against Crowder.

Why Graves is still off the hook for his handling of J6 prosecution in beyond me: Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
NEW: Jack Smith's transcript released.

🧵on his misrepresentations, falsehoods, and straight up lies told by the special counsel to House Judiciary Committee on Dec 17.

Smith had no evidence that any of the so-called "classified documents" he claimed to have found were in boxes temporarily stored in MAL ballroom or bathroom after the president left the White House.Image
Lie #2:

Smith was extremely aware of the 2024 election calendar--which is why he took what he himself described as the "extraordinary" step in asking the Supreme Court to bypass the DC appellate court--the next normal step-- in considering Judge Chutkan's Dec. 2023 order denying all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution and take up the immunity question immediately. (SCOTUS denied his request, Chutkan's order was upheld by 3-judge panel in Feb. 2024, which was then considered by SCOTUS in April. On July 1, 2024, SCOTUS issued its decision providing for a broad swath of immunity for acts in office, resulting in a major gutting of Smith's J6 indictment.)Image
Lie #3: That the unarmed protest at the Capitol on Jan 6 was an "attack" incited by the president and the still unsubstantiated allegation that 140 officers were injured by protesters.

Keep in mind: Smith's J6 indictment was four counts: two related to 1512(c)(2)--a corporate fraud statute unlawfully used in J6 cases according to SCOTUS in the Fischer decision--and two other VERY vague conspiracy counts, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy against "rights."Image
Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(