The sweeping pro-Russia disinfo on the Chinese internet isn’t created in a day. Want to recap a tiny bit of what happened in the past decade. As the idiom 草蛇灰线 goes, there’re always traces. All the developments below are intertwined with each other. 1/
First, social media’s evolution & commercialization of nationalism: Weibo moved from a social-issue-driven space to an idol-driven site. As the crackdown on celebrities grew, a younger, fandom-driven nationalism become the safest way to do media business and avoid troubles 2/
Every platform adjusted: WeChat public account boom created a lucrative industry for ppl who want to capitalize on nationalism. Douban’s little pinky groups proliferated. 鹅组 became a hub for reporting and doxxing ppl. Sensitive titles are banned from rating there, too. 3/
The changes are mandated and enabled by an evolved, multi-layered censorship machine, which combines blocking, de-prioritizing, reporting, warning, and outright jailing. Various parties from regional govs to Wangxinban—exercise this at their own discretion. 4/
Cuz censorship is selective, pro-Russia (and pro-gov narrative) views are a lot easier to survive, get traffic, make money, and have policy impacts. This goes back to fuel the censorship machine, as people are encouraged to report each other. 5/
That leaves self-censorship a default state when you say things. 6/
HK protests marked a huge shift. From 2014 to 2019, HK politics went from being deprioritized to strictly banned. Then as “港独” label was invented & amplified as a cardinal sin, advocacy for democracy became a topic that one can vehemently and lucratively denounce. 7/
Trump and the western right wing’s racist discourse only validate and helped the growth of Chinese nationalism. 8/
Meanwhile, good-faith discussions on both sides are constantly sidelined if not targeted or silenced. The mass quitting of local investigative journalists across Chinese legacy media; the exodus of foreign journalists; the shutdown of NGOs, etc. 9/
Plus, foreign media is fully demonized especially due to HK and Xinjiang coverage. Anti-orientalism discourses are also selectively picked up to criticize western media (it does deserve a lot of callouts). But diligent journos are often paying the price for provocateurs. 10/
The seemingly airtight narrative control was briefly cracked as COVID happened. The collective trauma, government coverup, and Dr. Li Wenliang shook the country. People resort to social media for help. And the illusion of an invincible regime is demystified for a sec. 11/
But things shifted as COVID became global: The gov discovered a new kind of governance legitimacy: COVID ZERO. With its mobilization power, thorough and draconian lockdowns, zero COVID boosted the gov's confidence as most other Western countries fail at their COVID response. 12/
That comes at a huge price, too. It’s a massive operation—from local gov to central propaganda—to normalize and justify the sacrifice. But it also provides a moral high ground that emboldened the central gov various drastic moves—like NSL in HK. 13/
The opnion landscape of Winter Olympics and Russia’s invasion are two sides of a coin. It could be an engineered illusion where disagreements are massively silenced. But it shows what influencers, media, censorship, local & central governments, and hawks brewed for a decade. 14/
All above is just a tip of iceberg, and there's nothing new if you're already familiar with the Chinese internet. 15/
Media often lump all the parties in China as one unified thing, but even Hu Xijin's China is framed slightly different from Global Times' (the former as EIC has more leeway and profits from bothsidism). 17/
And Zhao Lijian's China is also vastly different from Li Jiaqi's. We can't cover China without drawing distinctions of which China we're really talking about here. 18/
That's it for today's rant. Have a great day and follow @karenkho's @doomscroll_bot for some self-care tips cuz we all need it. 19/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One area that intl journalism fails as a whole: big intl news orgs have very little accountability, power or willingness to protect their journalists especially for those who are contracted, working with visas, or serving “staff” as local “news assistants” 1/
But local reporters, stringers, field producers are what holds intl reporting together. Many of them don’t even get bylines. All they get is some recommendation letters applying for grad schools (where many are already experienced enough to teach there) 2/
Even the best US J schools won’t teach intl journo students some most crucial skills: how to figure out the visa game, negotiate w/ Western editors who don’t know there sh*t, mentally prep in a place/industry who have no issue ditching u the minute they find it convenient 3/
One good thing this site actually facilitates: in the past 48 hrs, numerous mini-protests took place across various Chinese college campus against zero COVID policy. Many are censored but they ended up on Twitter, then ppl get to smuggle them back behind GFW, even just briefly
the irony of the time: such creative and daring protests take place within China, get censored, then end up a small fighting chance back in the country — with the help from a site that’s barely surviving
It’s increasingly impossible to describe the level of heartbreaking absurdity that Chinese people are experiencing, in every shape and form that varies from day to day and neighborhood to neighborhood…
…It lives in every snippet of ridiculous anecdote you’d come across everyday and drowns in the piles and piles and piles of them accruing by the second…
…It lives in WeChat murmurs, dinner talks, pop-up windows, direct or self-censorship efforts, but also dies as the absurd incidents overrides themselves with bigger, evolved, crazier versions…
Pundits can talk about Pelosi’s Taiwan visit for months but few would learn about the most talked topic in China weeks ago: sweeping cancellation of 18+ comic cons overnight due to an absurd anti-Japan conspiracy—yet it’s this kind of curated nationalism informs & feeds…
the central gov to make decisions. One can also observe how much the government enables such extremism. This is also a reminder that why a huge amount China analysis is laughably shallow. In the words of Ursula K. Le Guin…
…all the relentless guessing exhibits the perfect uselessness of knowing the answer to the wrong question.
Such an honor to be included in this #AAJA22 Voices Investigation on the lack of diversity in American mainstream journalism awards. And what a time to learn that Pulitzer — after over a century — has its FIRST Asian American voting member only in 2020. aajavoices.org/losangeles2022…
I stand by my quote. The whole award scene has spared a lot of empathy on things that white Americans care about. It awards parachute journalism, white saviors, simplified narratives, and glorified tragedies at the expense of local ppl/media workers.
It's still biting to remember that Pulitzer (or most major journalism awards) didn't even spare any recognition for Chinese journalists on the ground for the early COVID coverage when they fought against censorship AND the complete uncertainty of a deadly pandemic