Thread by @KingMakerFT

Hot off the press is a detailed report on a formal canvass of voters in four counties in Colorado. useipdotus.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/useip-…

The findings are disturbing . Bottom line the statistical sampling experts found serious problems with , on average, 8% of all voters, with a low of 5% and high of 11%. These problems include 1) non-existent voters on the rolls who are shown as having voted in the last election;

2) real voters on the rolls who claim to have voted but whose votes were not recorded; 3) voters on the rolls with a fictional address; and 4) unexplained changes to the voting rolls database. If this canvass is accurate, it shows that thousands of voters were disenfranchised

when their votes were lost and never counted, and tens of thousands more were effectively disenfranchised when votes cast for non-existent “ghost” voters were counted, thereby offsetting legal votes cast by genuine voters.

Note- Accusations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 are generally anecdotal, which makes it almost impossible to prove that the results would have been different had the fraud or irregularities not occurred. The standards courts apply before they overturn an election result

are strict. Without strong evidence of fraud affecting a sufficient number of votes to change the result in any state, and which came to light shortly after the election, in time for a court challenge, Trump’s chances of overturning the results were zero. But canvasses such as

this out of Colorado are great indicators that something seriously was amiss that could have changed the result. Whether it did, in fact, do so is something we probably will never know. But these results do call into question the security and reliability of voting systems. Public

officials and elected representatives owe it to the voting public to fix these problems before the next election.