Okay so let's just ignore who posted this and said this. I'm kind of curious to hear from transgender women if you feel like this is a helpful defense for you? Completely overlooking whether you like this person or not objectively, You think you are helped by this?
I'm asking because even if my best friend said something like this in my defense, it would nick the back of my neck because it's misogyny and as a woman, that would just really bother me.
And while maybe there's a part of me that might appreciate the desire to defend me, I would probably feel like this wasn't a person I could fully trust.
I think we've long established That apparently this approach doesn't gel with me because I'm out of touch with current internet trends, but I'm really curious how other trans women feel about this completely ignoring who posted it and your feelings about that person
I'm all for telling transphobes to shut up because yeah, they should. But there is a long history of silencing women that would make me negatively respond to someone saying that women should speak less and that their opinions do not matter because they are women
I'm asking because apparently these tactics are productive for some people. Apparently many people find these tactics to be helpful to their cause. I'm trying to understand why because I have a hard time seeing it that way
I am often criticized for not entirely dismissing turf talking points because when I hear many of them speak, would I hear is a woman misdirecting her anger. That's something that is very much valid
Women have certainly been told for very long time to shut up and accept something that A man wants and I think that a lot of times they take that very real issue and pervert it into something different with trans women as target
So I guess for me deliberately and clearly making the argument that women should be quiet and accept transgender women, just kind of plays. Very neatly into that hand and feels incredibly unhelpful to me. But I can understand that maybe this feels cathartic for others
Because I am personally a person who likes to have conversations and figure out where we can coexist, I just see this is very unproductive. How nice it feels to tell a trans phobe to shut up.
I think what I personally struggle with is that people reading this are not going to come out of it with seeing a cisgender man just being misogynistic as they always are, they're coming out of it believing that transgender women are misogynistic and so are their defenders
I really struggle to see how that's helpful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Logging back onto Twitter to openly address and warn the Los Angeles Goth and BDSM community about DracHaus after they made THIS statement as a reaction to the venue being called out for hiring a known rapist.
Only making this thread to warn and b/c it was suppressed internally
#Drachaus is an “underground” afterhours in LA and it’s one I frequented for years. It is, inherently an edgy place where questionable things happen. It being underground also means that it’s been a great venue for many alt events in LA. I’ve been to many diff events there.
As an afterhours, you expect there to be drugs and such and maybe even questionable people. What you wouldn’t expect, purely based on the events they’ve hosted, is for them to have this attitude about rape and assault. But it turns out, this has long been an issue
I was raised very suburban. No one in my family sags their clothing. We are Christian and none of us idealize criminals. And yet, none of that matters. You will still project racism onto me. This lesson is a cornerstone of "wokeness". That no amount of assimilation will save you.
It makes so much sense to me that white people struggle to understand conversations that aren't meant for them. It's simply untrue that if only black people assimilated closer to whiteness that they wouldn't experience racism. Believing this can kill you. It's happened many times
And this is a good example of what I'm talking about. White folks misappropriate at the term to essentially suggest that if a black person experiences oppression, it is their fault. Entirely.
Now, of course you could argue that if a person commits a crime, they deserve to be punished for said crime. And that seems like pretty reasonable logic until you recognize the nature of the law.
Historically, the law has functioned in a way to where something like chattel slavery can exist in this country and be completely legal, yet a slave stealing food is illegal. So who does the law serve really?
It's a term created by black people meant to be used in private conversations between black people about blackness. When it stopped being that, it lost its meaning and became a trite. Which is a good example of why it should have only remained in that context.
My observation is that white people, probably because of white supremacy will always feel entitled to everything they come into contact with regardless of how appropriate or not appropriate it is. So they can say anything they want. The question is should they?
At this point, in my opinion it becomes hard not to deny that white people's misuse of the term has derailed the conversations being had about white supremacy.
Woke has a fixed meaning. Its a term created by black folks to be used in conversations between black folks about being aware of the full dangers of white supremacy. It has been intentionally misapproriated to derail that conversation and become meaningless.
It's not a coincidence that the same people who hate education about racism in schools (CRT is another great example of intentional misappropriation) also hate "wokeness".
And convincing people that racism is not real and does not have a real repercussion and that those feeling it are only living in a victim's mentality serves whom exactly? White supremacy requires people, especially of color denying the realities of it