Conversation with my Russian friend living in Germany about whether or not Russians are aware of what's happening outside their country
They are lmao but go ahead and leave Yelp reviews
Blocked out the name of the platform because I don't want people trolling it.
A lot of this "we have to reach the Russians" stuff seems primarily aimed at satisfying the need of Western libs to "do something." You wear the mask. You support BLM. You send the text.
Cannot believe the WSJ ran an article about libs crowdfunding "baby do you know what Putin is doin" communiqués
Imagine being a regular Russian and you've learned FB/Instagram allow calls for your death and the whole world has condemned you as vile subhumans and you get this text from somebody in San Francisco
"The war must stop, we stand with Ukraine we are with you🇺🇦🏳️🌈✊🏿"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Western and Ukrainian media lied to the world about Ukraine dominating the battlefield. That encouraged foreigners to sign up for presumably easy combat against Russia. Now a lot of them are dead.
Your delusions have real consequences and they get people killed.
Experts high on copium gave people the impression that this would be like easy mode Call of Duty. Congratulations, you got what you asked for.
There is no shortage of Reddit/Twitter accounts posting nonstop "Russians are SO bad at war!" content that it really did convince foreigners that this would be like a video game.
You got updoots and likes and retweets, they got killed.
Interesting that you're starting see more claims about a Russian WMD scenario just as Ukraine's military is cracking and its major cities are being encircled.
Fortunately, the media has convinced everyone that Ukraine is winning, which makes a "Saddam has WMDs" operation easy.
Makes sense to me that Russia would use WMDs of some sort after all this time, right when negotiation with Ukraine appears increasingly possible, and after the warmongers have said that WMD usage would trigger direct intervention
Published just a few hours ago lol, it's in the air
There's a graphic video of man who says in Ukrainian that journalist Brent Anthony Renaud was shot in Romanivka near Irpin, at the time under Ukrainian control. Based on his equipment, he looks like a Ukrainian cop who arrived on scene. 1/
I posted earlier but I deleted. Here are screenshots of the speaker and a Ukrainian cop. Renaud is just out of view here, bottom right corner. 2/
Deleted the original post because the video is graphic, like I said. But the body is easily visible and matches Renaud's. The man calls Brent by name in the video.
Point is, these are important details so far totally omitted from the discourse. They also complicate the story. 3/
A journalist was killed while carrying a New York Times press pass. But he hasn't worked with the Times since 2015. Initial reports said he was shot by Russians in a town under Ukrainian control. Now Ukrainian officials are saying "the details of his were not immediately clear."
This is another fog of war incident. There are reports that he was killed while trying get through a checkpoint but why would you try to blow through a checkpoint in a war zone?
Having an expired Times pass probably gets you access as credentials, but the checkpoint story is still strange for a number of reasons, including the fact that one purpose of checkpoints, Russian or Ukrainian, is to avoid exactly this kind of incident.
When asked if Russia is concerned about the weapons it's dumping in Ukraine being used to shoot down civilian airliners, a senior Russian defense official said: "frankly, that's a risk we're willing to take"
Just kidding, a US government official at the Pentagon said that
I've got family and friends in Europe, but if anything happens to them now that Ukraine is importing Syrian al-Qaeda fighters to own the Russians who might get bored and shoot down an airliner, I'll comfort myself with the knowledge that at least the State Department got its way
Implications of the Ukrainian bio lab story are huge.
Russia claims US has been developing bioweapons. US denies--but then Victoria Nuland's testimony suggests the US is in fact hiding something. But US establishment can't admit anything because then *Russia* is more truthful.
A cornerstone of the US foreign policy establishment is that countries like Russia are incapable of telling the truth. This is used to justify DC's meddling.
But this risks blowing all of that up, which is why Republicans and Democrats will go on lockstep here.
This also isn't like Iraq with WMDs. Nuland admitted that there is something there that we don't want the Russians to get...but it's purely defensive/benign?