NEW: I’m not sure people appreciate quite how bad the Covid situation is in Hong Kong, nor what might be around the corner.
First, an astonishing chart.
After keeping Covid at bay for two years, Omicron has hit HK and New Zealand, but the outcomes could not be more different.
After accounting for lag between infection & death, *1 in 20* cases in Hong Kong currently ends in death.
To put that into context, HK’s case fatality rate (NB different to infection fatality rate) is currently higher than England’s pre-vaccine peak. Two years into the pandemic.
Hong Kong doesn’t just look grim when compared to its Asia-Pacific peers.
In March 2020 we saw awful pictures from northern Italy. Last winter, UK & Portugal saw huge mortality spikes, and last summer it was Namibia, but Hong Kong has now set a new global record for daily deaths
The cumulative view almost looks like a glitch in the data.
Hong Kong’s total death toll has risen almost vertically in the last two weeks, shooting past not only its Asia-Pacific peers, but now European countries including Norway and Finland. And that line will keep rising.
Comparing Hong Kong to its peers, all of whom kept Covid largely at bay for the best part of two years, it’s extraordinary the extent to which it is an outlier in terms of the lethality of this wave.
So what’s driving this?
Vaccines.
Or more specifically: the elderly vaccination rate.
When Omicron hit, *more than two-thirds of people aged 80+ in Hong Kong were still unvaccinated*, compared to a couple of percent in New Zealand and Singapore. This was a year after vaccines became available.
Exacerbating this is that most of Hong Kong’s elderly vaccinees had China’s non-mRNA Sinovac shot, which is less effective than Pfizer etc at blocking infection.
Sinovac does fare better against severe disease, but overall this is likely to have contributed to the poor outcomes.
Now you might think, well, the over-80s are only a small share of the population, so surely this can’t have such an enormous impact on overall fatality rates?
But that would be to miss the fact that, all else being equal, older people are at far *far* higher risk of death from Covid than younger
So vax rates by age are better understood like this, with bars sized according to each age group’s baseline mortality risk.
That is a helluva lot of red, unvaxxed people. And in Zero Covid countries there are no prior infections, so these people are completely immuno-naive.
In a situation grimly reminiscent of England in March 2020, outbreaks have torn through Hong Kong’s care homes, killing more than 1,000 vulnerable residents in a matter of days.
Earlier I warned about what might yet be around the corner.
Aside from Hong Kong itself, where the surge in cases in recent days is sure to have locked in hundreds more deaths, the looming crisis is mainland China, where elderly vaccination rates are only slightly better than HK
Around 15 million over-80s in mainland China are still unvaccinated. An astonishing number
In recent days China has locked down tens of millions in several cities, as it braces for a much worse wave than Jan 2020 where the bulk of infection was confined to Hubei province.
One thing I would hope people take away here is that this really underscores the importance of differentiating between Omicron’s intrinsic mildness and immunity-driven mildness.
In December, as Omicron took off in South Africa, many of us emphasised time and again that the observed reduction in severity in a population with lots of vax and infection was likely to be coming as much from that immunity as from intrinsic mildness
What we’re seeing in Hong Kong shows that this was true.
Omicron *is intrinsically milder* than variants like Delta, but that dip in severity is far outweighed by the huge impact of ripping through an elderly population with minimal vaccination and no prior infection.
Remember my now-infamous chart of England’s Covid infection fatality ratio? Take away mass vaccination of the vulnerable and prior infection, and you could easily end up with something looking more like this.
There’s absolutely nothing mild about Omicron here.
Finally, some notes and hat-tips:
1) I have Hong Kong’s case fatality ratio at around 4-5%, where Hong Kong’s official daily report puts it at 0.64%. This appears to be because they are not accounting for the lag between infection and death chp.gov.hk/files/pdf/loca…
2) @tripperhead continues to tirelessly document the toll of Hong Kong’s Omicron wave, including key exchanges from the daily press conferences. Follow him.
4) It’s not just Hong Kong currently seeing significant Covid death tolls from Omicron. The case fatality rate in South Korea is lower, but not vastly so, and it’s producing some grim results, as @VincentRK shows in this thread
My wish for the next election is that poll trackers look like the one on the right 👉 not the left
This was yet another election where the polling showed it could easily go either way, but most of the charts just showed two nice clean lines, one leading and one trailing. Bad!
Pollsters and poll aggregators have gone to great lengths to emphasise the amount of uncertainty in the polls in recent weeks...
But have generally still put out charts and polling toplines that encourage people to ignore the uncertainty and focus on who’s one point ahead. Bad!
The thing about human psychology is, once you give people a nice clean number, it doesn’t matter how many times you say "but there’s an error margin of +/- x points, anything is possible".
People are going to anchor on that central number. We shouldn’t enable this behaviour!
We’re going to hear lots of stories about which people, policies and rhetoric are to blame for the Democrats’ defeat.
Some of those stories may even be true!
But an underrated factor is that 2024 was an absolutely horrendous year for incumbents around the world 👇
Harris lost votes, Sunak lost votes, Macron lost votes, Modi (!) lost votes, as did the Japanese, Belgian, Croatian, Bulgarian and Lithuanian governments in elections this year.
Any explanation that fails to take account for this is incomplete.
Many of the NHS’s difficulties can be traced back to the deep cuts in manager numbers.
Fixing this doesn’t just unblock waiting lists, it also gives doctors more time to be doctors, and alleviates the stress and poor morale that come from having to do things that aren’t your job
Here’s another fun NHS low hanging fruit example:
A trial last year found that by running two operating theatres side by side, they cut the time between operations from 40 minutes to 2, and were able to do a week’s worth of surgeries in one day thetimes.com/uk/article/lon…
In what might be one of the most significant trends I have ever charted, the US obesity rate fell last year.
My column this week is about this landmark data point, and what might be behind it ft.com/content/21bd0b…
We already know from clinical trials that Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs produce sustained reductions in body weight, but with mass public usage taking off — one in eight US adults have used the drugs — the results may now be showing up at population level.
It’s really striking how the Corbynite left has migrated to the Greens.
The result is a curious coalition between the older and more Nimby environmentalist base, and the new hard left/progressive influx.
These are quite different people with quite different politics!
In 2019, one in ten Green voters was from the most progressive/left segment of voters; now that’s one in four.
Big difference in policy preferences, priorities and pressure on the leadership, as we’ve seen in e.g reaction to Denyer’s Biden statement.
The most glaring tension between these two types of Green is on decarbonisation, where the older Nimby base doesn’t want pylons *or even onshore wind farms* but many of the new progressive Green vote do.
Greens are actually less keen on wind farms than Labour and Lib Dem voters!