Let's call a spade a spade. Every mean-spirited piece of legislation or court ruling done in the name of 'equality' or 'emancipation' is just one more legislative stick with which to beat the Indian Muslim minority out of the body politic. I don't support it. #HijabVerdict
From NRC, CAA, Triple Talaq judgment to the Hijab row, to the made up 'love-jihad' cases, what we are witnessing is a PROCESS of the dilution of rights for Muslims. This is institutional violence yes, but it is also accompanied by bullying, harassment, attacks, lynchings and
other acts of open violence against minorities, including non-Muslim minorities.
I strongly predict a global backlash against such acts of the Indian state and the people who will be at the receiving end of this backlash will be Indians in other countries.
I want people to understand that in theory the Indian state does not really care about who wears what. If they did, we wouldn't have shirtless homeless kids on the streets.
What the state does care about is bullying a community into a political corner, NOT to emancipate anyone
(that's the lie they tell themselves. If they were serious about emancipation, ghoonghats would have been banned ages ago)
They care about how the basest instincts of The Hindu majority specifically in the Hindi heartland respond to such acts of state-led bullying.
When that response is one of superiority and pride (however misplaced), the bullying formula is working. I can't tell you what's needed to be done here, as there is so much prejudice to be encountered everywhere. All I can say is that no one wins here, except the BJP.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do you remember the time when Dalit women had to bare their torsos to upper castes? And if they didn’t they had to pay a “breast tax” in Kerala? Do you know of or remember brave Nangeli who cut off her breasts and bled to death as resistance to the “Mullakaram” tax?
Today Muslim women are being hounded by Hindu Indian men to remove their head scarves. Tomorrow they will hound Dalit women, tribal women, women in jeans or skirts or saris, to remove items of clothing.
After all isn’t disrobing and humiliation of a woman central to atleast one Indian myth?
Don’t let women’s clothing be a decision that comes from men or community. Khaps in Haryana already blame jeans for rapes.
I've read this piece TWICE today. This should be the biggest story in India. Democratic conversations on social media were hijacked and trends were manufactured using #TekFog. Social media users were promised a govt job and more money to basically spread BJP propaganda.
The piece very correctly points out that a partisan information environment was manufactured in India and that public narratives are engineered.
Many of the hashtags that were being auto-retweeted can be categorised as hate speech. I won't amplify them here. They're in the screenshots of the piece.
So the BJP's popularity isn't technically real in the digital world. It is very carefully manufactured.
Perhaps instead of rationalization of devious actions by developing sympathetic narratives we should be looking at how perverted young minds are getting because of radicalization, which unfortunately, you and the channel are a part of spreading.
The sympathy was never extended to students of Jamia or JNU, youngsters at t anti-CAA protests, young environmental activists who were wrongfully imprisoned, or the scores of young people booked under devious laws.
Let’s address what’s staring us in the face. Young people are being radicalized by Hindutva. And it’s not going to end well.
Am I the only one who is a tad suspicious of Vir Das’ wokeness?
Let me explain what I mean. I think because some of his material is catering to a western audience he has this tendency to use orientalist tropes as material. I can’t distinguish between the internal orientalism and the punchline. I don’t know. Does this make sense?
Again I do applaud him for speaking out but the India he represents is an India that has mostly been protected by privilege. I think I would like to applaud him for taking a stand, but I also think it’s healthy to open up a debate about stand-up and discourses of power embedded
This is my considered response to Manu Joseph's column titled "Many women don't adore the idea of men: Now what?" I am writing this in the spirit of opening a conversation about the issues raised and as an Indian woman, who often throws words like "patriarchy" around.
Thread!
The column starts with this "After the death of some elderly Indian men, their widows grow healthier, their eyes flaunt life, and their skin glow." I am not sure what this is meant to convey. Do some women rejoice on the death of their husbands? And are these women in the elite?
Or is the author trying to say that some of these relationships were so bad for the women that upon the death of the patriarch they somehow get better? So is this an indictment of the women for healing? Or is this an indictment of husbands who are so rotten that
A couple of thoughts about the issues raised by @Settler_Scholar on research done in Kashmir and other militarized areas. Yes absolutely, a researcher needs to reveal their background. I am from an army family and never once did I think of not mentioning it to people I spoke to.
In my experience in militarized areas that is always an awkward conversation, but I have always found that once the truths are tabled, people just connect on a very human basis and that awkward conversation can become the basis of trust and honesty.
However, I also think that some of the criticism that came in that thread took the tone of making a woman responsible for the actions of her father. I find that unsettling. But certainly scholars are responsible for their own actions.