We need to talk about #Westplaining.
It’s a term coined by the Eastern European left to describe a tendency of certain Western leftists to ascribe everything that happens east of Germany to Western policy.
Thread/
Those I read on the Eastern European left really hate Westplaining. Why? Because it denies their lived reality. It supposes that anyone living beyond 15° East has no agency, and is passively subject to the whims of Western strategy.
It suggests that Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia etc were manipulated by the West into joining NATO, because they have no interests or will of their own. It suggests that Putin is a mere puppet of Western machinations, who can be yanked about as if he were made of rags.
It’s a classic colonial trope, a subject-object relationship. Only Westerners have agency and interests: the rest of the world is an empty vessel, waiting to be filled with meaning and intention by our good or evil schemes.
In particular, the Westplainer narrative suggests that the West set a trap for Russia that it couldn’t help walking into. Often, they talk of Russia as a bear, that has fallen into this trap. Because, of course, it has no human intelligence of its own.
Typically, these articles suggest a complete absence of engagement with Eastern European leftists. The references are to other Westerners. It’s a conversation they are having with each other, about people they have not met and to whom they do not listen.
Do Westplainers really think they know something that the Kremlin doesn’t? That after a couple of hours googling, they've seen into the dark heart of Western strategy, and the Russian government hasn’t? That Putin is being led blindly into a trap they have spotted and he hasn't?
This story suits Putin very well, and he tells a cynical version of it himself: I was provoked, I had no choice, Russia is encircled by NATO and has to strike back. It is used to disguise a highly aggressive, imperialist strategy of his own.
It’s notable that some of those who treat him as a mindless victim of Western scheming are also happy to recite blatant Kremlin propaganda, for example grossly overemphasising the influence of Ukrainian fascists, and describing the 2014 revolution as a “US coup”.
The “US coup” meme has the remarkable distinction of simultaneously channeling both Russian imperial and Western imperial propaganda: “those little Ukrainians couldn’t possibly have organised their own revolution, could they? It must have been done for them - by us.”
None of this is to suggest that the US and Europe do not have their own grim strategy. They do, and it can be just as cynical and aggressive as the Westplainers say it is. But the point is that it does not exist in a vacuum.
Nor is it unknown to either the Kremlin or to people living in countries that border the Russian Federation. Nor are they without responses and strategies of their own.
Reading the responses to this thread, it seems to me that some people are trying to force Ukraine in the 2020s into a frame that might have worked for Latin America in the 1980s. The world has changed, but their analysis has not.
1. This week’s column is about something we badly want to believe, regardless of the evidence: that livestock farms are benign and harmonious. Why? Mostly, I think, because it chimes with books and cartoons we see as very young children. Also: a threadtheguardian.com/commentisfree/…
2. It discusses a film enjoying unexpected success in UK cinemas: Six Inches of Soil. In many ways, it’s a good film. But it tells us a story we want to hear, and in some respects is misleading and wrong. sixinchesofsoil.org
3. This is especially the case with the carbon calculations for the cattle farm it features: first we see a temporary, cyclical gain reported as making the farm carbon negative. Then entirely hypothetical figures treated as if they are real. Both cases are serious misinformation
1. There’s a telling sequence in the Netflix docuseries Raël. A completely mad cult claims, without a jot of evidence, to have cloned a human. And the world’s media fall for it, hook, line and sinker. All it took to fool them was 2 people in white coats and some lab equipment.🧵
2. What do we learn from this?
A. That the media is as susceptible to evident BS as the members of the crazy cult.
B. That it has a massive diversity problem – and not just the one(s) you are probably thinking of.
3. In any major newsroom, just about the only people with science degrees are specialist reporters. Almost without exception, the senior staff and main decision-makers have non-science degrees. Their knowledge of basic science is approximately zero.
Nowadays, when you discuss the far right, people insist “That’s not far right!”.
Folk who have plainly shifted to the far right claim to have “transcended left and right”. Or state that the terms have no meaning.
What’s going on?
Hold onto your seats, it’s a wild ride. 🧵
For the past few years there has been a concerted effort on the far right to reposition Nazism and fascism as left/socialist movements.
I know, I know, but bear with me, because this is now a widespread thing, and unsuspecting people have been fooled by it.
As usual with these matters, it began - and continues - with utter blithering idiocy. “Nazism stands for National Socialism: ergo it’s socialism.” Hitler and Goebbels both mentioned socialism in public statements, therefore they were socialists.
In the UK and around the world, environmental defenders are being attacked with ever more extreme laws. Who designs these laws? Corporate lobbyists. Who demands they are imposed? The billionaire media.
THIS IS NOT JUSTICE.
This week's column. 🧵 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
In the UK, you can now receive a longer sentence for “public nuisance” – meaning peaceful civil disobedience – than for rape or manslaughter.
Ordinary criminals are being released from prison early, and the spaces filled with environmental defenders.
Around the world, corporate lobbyists (often disguised as "thinktanks") have been drafting new laws against those who challenge destructive industries. The billionaire press then demands the introduction of these laws, while demonising peaceful campaigners. It's totally corrupt.
This is a shocking exposure of how the BBC has been captured and disciplined by government minders. It might explain why, almost every day, the BBC still lets corporate lobbyists from Tufton Street junktanks pose as independent, objective commentators.🧵prospectmagazine.co.uk/ideas/media/64…
This is in direct contravention of the BBC’s own editorial guidelines. It breaches them day after day. Almost the only times when these corporate lobbyists are held to account is when guests challenge them about the way they hide their funding.
I don’t want to have to do this. I want to get on and argue about the issues. But transparency is essential to democracy, and when corporations and oligarchs can get what they want by hiding behind their secretly-funded lobbyists, we are all the poorer for it.
The UK government's criminalisation of rough sleeping, now passing through Parliament in the Criminal Justice Bill, is overseen by a Prime Minister who owns four luxury homes for his own use. One of them, in Kensington, is reserved for accommodating family guests.🧵
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread." Anatole France
What we are seeing play out in the UK, in ever more extreme forms, is class war. The war being waged by the rich against the poor.