Pedro L. Gonzalez Profile picture
Mar 15, 2022 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
The Western intelligence apparatus won the information war in Ukraine before a shot was fired. Even new publications like the Kyiv Independent have received support from NGOs that do in public what the CIA used to do in private. My story in @HumanEvents +🧵humanevents.com/2022/03/15/the…
The Independent is a good example. It's got growing subscriber base now, but according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, it was created with an "emergency grant from the European Endowment for Democracy," a spinoff of the National Endowment for Democracy. What is the NED?
On the surface, it's an NGO that promotes civil society worldwide by, among other things, sponsoring and providing training for journalists and activists directly or indirectly. The reality, however, is different. web.archive.org/web/2022030510…
Here's ProPublica's characterization: "The National Endowment for Democracy was established by Congress, in effect, to take over the CIA's covert propaganda efforts. But, unlike the CIA, the NED promotes U.S. policy and interests openly." propublica.org/article/the-na…
The NED's co-founder, Allen Weinstein, admitted as much. "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA," he said in an interview with the Washington Post entitled, "Innocence Abroad: The New World of Spyless Coups." washingtonpost.com/archive/opinio…
"The biggest difference is that when such activities are done overtly, the flap potential [i.e., embarrass or embroil the CIA in controversy] is close to zero," Weinstein said. Recall that in 1967, Ramparts magazine humiliated the agency by exposing . . . fas.org/blogs/secrecy/…
. . . that it had turned the National Student Association's international activities into "an arm of United States foreign policy" through undercover financing and secret collaboration. Now, "Openness is its own protection," as Weinstein put it. nytimes.com/1967/02/16/arc…
In fall 2021, a profile of the Independent's chief editor, Olga Rudenko, appeared in ProMarket, a publication of the Stigler Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Rudenko was visiting the school for a journalism development program. web.archive.org/web/2021092307…
According to ProMarket, she is also a board member at the Media Development Foundation, an NGO that has received at least $225,140 from the NED. You won't find that without a digital archive because the NED's records of funding projects in Ukraine was recently moved or deleted.
The archived page shows that from 2014 to the present, the NED has granted $22,394,281 through 334 awards to Ukraine. However, since the change, the NED only allows users to search back to 2017.

Others have noticed this too. mronline.org/2022/03/08/nat…
The MDF's Facebook page features several posts referencing partnerships, exchange programs, and training affiliated with the NED that often conclude with an appreciative variation of: "to our partners National Endowment for Democracy, without them there would be nothing."
There's a lot more here. It is impossible to understand the ongoing information war without going back to the coup supported by the U.S. State Department in Ukraine in 2014.

humanevents.com/2022/03/15/the…
During the "Maidan Uprising," several people were killed by snipers. Westerners were led to believe by the media that it was the soon to be deposed President Viktor Yanukovych who was the blame.

But there was evidence someone else had orchestrated the violence.
"Analysis of the snipers massacre shows that the Maidan protesters initiated almost all—at least six out of a possible eight—of the pivotal escalatory moments of violence and/or coercion," American scholar Gordon M. Hahn found.

In other words, it not Yanukovych.
Instead, a lot of people suspected that DC was involved with the help of its European allies.

"Snipers were also trained in Poland" as "a favor to Washington," said Polish politician Janusz Korwin-Mikke in an interview with Wirtualna Polska. opinie.wp.pl/korwin-mikke-s…
The sniper killings were central to the Maidan because it gave Westerners the impression that Yanukovych was a brutal tyrant. Their deaths were used to further justify regime change by the media.

The current information war out of Ukraine is a continuation of what started then.
Western backed journalists and activists in Ukraine helped create a perception about the 2014 coup that wasn't true. That perception was used to justify what Washington wanted.

This is important, because Ukraine media ops are happening again.
Expanding this thread:

The Kyiv Independent is just one of many organizations in the axis pushing propaganda to get us into WWIII.

You've probably also seen warmongering CEPA "disinformation experts" like Olga Tokariuk. The director of CEPA's disinfo program is a NED fellow. ImageImageImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pedro L. Gonzalez

Pedro L. Gonzalez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emeriticus

Jan 25
BREAKING Trump has issued a statement in support of the Republican governors defying the Biden administration on the border

Just kidding, he posted about E. Jean Carroll about a dozen times


Image
Image
Image
Image
It just keeps going

Image
Image
Image
look at my GOP front runner dog it’s over


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 30, 2023
Mike DeWine Is an Idiot

🧵

Today, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine vetoed a bill designed to ban the crime against children called “gender-affirming care.” What DeWine presented as the well-thought-out reasoning behind his decision was a steaming pile of garbage.

DeWine claimed that, were he to support the bill, “Ohio would be saying that the state, that the government, knows better what is best for a child than the two people who know that child the best—the parents.”

“The Ohio way is to approach things in a systematic manner, to follow the evidence, to be careful, and that’s really what we’re doing,” DeWine added.

Where to begin?

Perhaps it's best to start by highlighting that there is little (to be charitable) to no (to be honest) solid evidence behind the long-term effectiveness of “gender-affirming care” for minors.

Two major investigations recently conducted by The New York Times and Reuters came to that conclusion, each in their own wending way. Moreover, the puberty blockers used in this obscene form of “care” are administered off-label—without approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The pharmaceutical companies that profit from this have no desire to even conduct clinical trials to establish their safety in this regard or attempt to understand the permanent consequences of blocking puberty at a critical developmental stage. Why should they bother? They have fools like DeWine who will gladly enable them to pump poison into the veins of your sons and daughters.

Read⤵️
Lupron Depot-Ped is the most commonly prescribed puberty blocker given to “transgender youth.” Here are some adverse events filed in the FDA’s reporting database in connection with the drug:

-Depression
-Suicidal ideation
-Emotional disorder
-Depressed mood
-Emotional distress
-Mental disorder
-Psychotic disorder
-Suicide attempt
-Growth retardation
-Antisocial behavior
-Psychotic symptom

⤵️
So when DeWine says he is following the evidence, he betrays his stupidity about the issue or assumes the average American is stupid or both. But they’re certainly smarter than he is on this.⤵️
Read 9 tweets
Dec 27, 2023
DeSantis' campaign has had problems. No doubt. But that's not the full picture. A key problem, one that had to be discovered the hard way, is that Trump has a patronage network that will not move to or support a different candidate.

For reasons that become obvious, this is a sacred cow few people on the right are prepared to poke, let alone slay.

Tucker Carlson's first post-Fox advertising deal was with a company in which Donald Trump Jr. is an investor. Once that happened, the hope of impartiality was gone. It's the same deal with Human Events and Post Millennial. The Human Events Media Group acquisition of Post Millennial was led by Trump donor and booster Jeff Webb, so there was no chance those publications would swing behind or help a Trump rival.

Consider that when Daniel Penny's legal defense fundraiser blew up because DeSantis promoted it, Post Millennial did a story about it *without mentioning DeSantis* once. It was like Stalinists erasing a purged person from a photograph.

When I was still doing conservative media, I was told that Team Trump was monitoring programs for critics, using their influence to try to suppress them. There is just no scenario in which a network like this will select a candidate that is best for the movement rather than the network itself, even if the individuals involved were to want the latter.

The whole thing was described to me simply as: if you play ball, you get access; if you decide that Trump isn't the best way forward, you lose access (and worse, if you don't keep your mouth shut). If you're a personality, that means no more invitations to Mar-a-Lago for a movie screening or retweets from big accounts. But there was no way of knowing how any of this worked until someone challenged Trump, then the whole thing sprang into action and circled the wagons around him and himself.

The ramifications of all this will extend beyond the primary, regardless of the outcome. There will be permanent fractures and disillusionment. That's how I feel about national "right-wing" politics right now. But to understand why, you have to understand the networks.
Nothing against @AuronMacintyre btw, these are just my thoughts on the broader rw landscape
This is a double edge sword btw, because if you benefit from it, it's nice and it can help you do some good or get your message out in your space--but it will also work against you by justifying everything Trump does. Say you're a pro-Trump tough on crime person. Sorry--but if Trump wants to do the First Step Act, you're going to get the First Step Act shoved down your throat. And the harder you protest, the more it will hurt going down.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 11, 2023
New: While serving in the Trump administration, Brooke Rollins was, among other things, instrumental in the passage of the First Step Act that freed rapists and murderers from federal prison

She now runs Trump’s official think tank, making over $550K

🧵
Image
Image
Rollins was one of the advisers who told Trump that getting tough on Black Lives Matter/George Floyd rioters in 2020 would seem racist

He of course agreed with her
Image
Image
Now, Rollins runs Trump’s America First Policy Institute (AFPI), which will likely staff the next White House if he wins

It’s been called the “White House in waiting”

politico.com/news/2022/07/2…
Read 8 tweets
Nov 30, 2023
Vivek is responding to my reporting. He isn’t being honest. He didn’t just say something “stupid” on a podcast. He sent members of Congress a memo advocating against lifting lockdowns and for creating a national registry. A company he created pitched the idea to the FDA and worked with the federal government on it.

Here’s a timeline:

-February 2020: Datavant, a healthcare data company created by Vivek, recruits George W. Bush-Era FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach.

-March 2020: Datavant begins spearheading a registry of COVID-19 patients by pooling medical records from across the country (WSJ).

-April 3, 2020: Vivek says on the Rockefeller Client Insights podcast that he supports a system where people would be “segregated” under a national testing regime.

-April 8, 2020: Datavant is in touch with the FDA about a “proposed registry” that “would aim to include every patient who has been tested for COVID-19” (WSJ).

It was around this time that Vivek circulated the memo I obtained to members of Congress in which he argued against lifting lockdowns and for implementing universal testing to determine who could go back to life. He concluded by proposing a “public-private” partnership, which is what his company Datavant pitched to the federal government.

-November 2020: Vivek’s company announced that it was collaborating on gathering patient data with the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

Vivek didn’t just support lockdowns—he tried to profit from it while collaborating with the very “regime” he claims to oppose. Then he tried to bury it, like he tried to bury details about his background by paying a Wikipedia editor to sanitize his biography weeks before declaring his candidacy.




Image
Image
Image
Image
He and his team have to pretend this is about the podcast because what I actually wrote is far more damning. I knew they would. That’s why I wrote this at the end: Image
Nothing says TRUTH like hiring someone to erase inconvenient details about your biography right before you run for president. Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 29, 2023
Exclusive: Vivek Ramaswamy Supported COVID Segregation

🧵

“Could we tolerate a national system in which certain people on the basis of a biomarker are segregated?”

That sounds like an excerpt from a science fiction novel about a medical dystopia. But it’s a quote from Vivek Ramaswamy, the biopharma entrepreneur and Republican presidential candidate.

In April 2020, as the U.S. went into lockdown, Ramaswamy said he would be open to that kind of system to determine who could “go back to normal life.” He described it as an “inequity,” but concluded that “everyone stands to benefit from it.” Ramaswamy made the comments during an episode of Rockefeller Client Insights, the podcast of Rockefeller Capital Management.

A concept like that is sharply at odds with the image of the civil libertarian he has cultivated during the primary. It also raises questions about his anti-establishment bona fides.

During the podcast, Ramaswamy talked about different aspects of the coronavirus outbreak with Gregory J. Fleming, the president and CEO of Rockefeller Capital Management. Fleming asked him what a “path to normalcy” might look like, given what he described as a “potentially extended timeline” for the rollout of vaccines and treatments. The country was then more than 15 days into “15 days to slow the spread.”

“One path to normalcy and a path that I’d like to see further progress made on is broad rollout of our antibody tests,” Ramaswamy said. He corrected himself and continued:

“It’s not our company; I’m saying, as a society, rolling out the antibody tests such that we actually get our arms around what portion of the population is already immune through exposures that they may not have even known that they had. It might be 10 percent, it might be 20 percent, we might discover that it is some higher number. Those people are gonna be able to get back to work pretty quickly, get back to normal life because effectively they have the immunity badge, they have a badge in the form of their antibodies that protect them best we know from reinfection.

On the flip side, you then have the people who don’t have immunity, and the question is those who are negative on the antibody tests, what happens with them? Now, this has been—I’ve had discussions in the last few days with policymakers, a couple of people in Congress, one U.S. Senator, and I think this is not lost on folks. But I think one early topic that’s come up is, could we tolerate a national system in which certain people on the basis of a biomarker are segregated? To say you can’t go back to normal life, where certain people get a head start. Is that an inequity we would tolerate? I personally think that it is better than the status quo if we can send 10 or 20 percent of the people back on the basis of having immunity that’s proven on the basis of a lab-based result that’s now available. That’s a good thing, and everyone stands to benefit from it.”

A draft for discussion obtained by Contra shows Ramaswamy pitched this strategy to policymakers.

“After its apex of COVID-19 cases, each state should start to administer universal antibody testing to determine which individuals have immunity to SARS-Cov-2 and which individuals do not,” he wrote. “Individuals with immunity can return to normal life, be released from social distancing practices, and help restart the economy.”

“States should also have a well-designed plan for who should be released from social distancing norms to help revive the economy in advance of the availability of a COVID-19 vaccine,” he added.

Read⤵️
In the discussion draft, he countered concern of societal “backlash against discriminating on the basis of antibody test results” by arguing that the alternative would be to “lift shelter-in-place and social distancing mandates on everyone which would increase the risk of new outbreaks.” ⤵️
Image
He proposed a “public-private partnership” whose stakeholders could be a “division of government, a private company, or a nonprofit organization” that would maintain “the registry of individuals who are immune and individuals who should be prioritized for testing.” ⤵️ Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(