Russian writer Boris Akunin, on 'discrimination' against Russian:
"Over the last several days, the words 'Russia' and 'Russian' have become swear words. They've become toxic. It's an emotional reaction. It's not going be fair. Because what's happening is an atrocity."
More wisdom in those words, spoken in 10 seconds, than in three hours of podcast bullshittery. Yes, there are overreactions. Yes, it's not fair. But let's remember why it's happening. Because human beings have an aversion to needless war and senseless brutality.
Let's keep some perspective. Overreacting is bad. But the thing people are reacting to is so much worse!
(Also, what a lot of the asshole commentators are evincing is more of an aesthetic disdain for sincerity than any kind of principled stand in defense of Russians.)
From this great interview which, again, I very highly recommend. With good English subtitles. Watch it and I promise you'll learn something about Russia.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russian writer and economist Maxim Mironov (@mironov_fm) has written an absolutely fascinating critique of the elite Russian media space. Read it here 👇 if you speak Russian. If you don't, keep reading this thread for my translation.
When the war began, everyone was horrified for two reasons. First, because Putin launched this insane war. Second, because most of the population supported him in this aggression.
When I saw the opinion surveys, I didn’t believe them.”
“I started looking into the opinions of my older acquaintances, with whom I hadn’t spoken for 20 years. To my surprise, about 80-90% of those who were older than 60 fiercely support the policies of Putin and the government. And these are people who’ve known me from birth.”
In an hour-long video, Glenn Greenwald gives credence to Russian claims that the Ukrainians were carrying out “emergency disposal” of dangerous pathogens they had been developing with US help.
I'm going to translate a *LONG* thread by a geneticist debunking these claims.
First off: This tweet presents the claims. In the screenshot, RIA Novosti publishes documents it says were obtained by the Russian defense ministry. They purport to show that the Ukrainians were scrubbing evidence of a biological weapons research program.
Here’s the beginning of the debunking thread by Olga Pettersson, a Soviet-born geneticist living and working in Sweden. If you read Russian, you can read it here. Otherwise, continue reading this thread. I’ll translate.
Don’t do this kind of thing. A school was attacked. Until there’s evidence to the contrary (so far there is none), it’s irresponsible to speculate that it was a “false flag.” This is not Russian media fabricating things, this is local German media reports.
Here’s another. The police say there have been dozens of incidents of Russians being threatened or attacked. There is no evidence at all that any of this is fabricated. tagesspiegel.de/berlin/zusamme…
But, apparently, there's a trend on Russian TikTok to film yourself panicking about the difficult economic situation in the country... set to a track called "vile Jewish music."
...yeah. Short thread.
Here's a Russian aggregator explaining the trend. (This site, online since 2014, seems to get most of its material from social media posts.) medialeaks.ru/0503mlv-txt-po…
Here's one example. This girl bought an iPhone just before prices went up, and now she doesn't know whether to open it or to sell it.
A bit more on that UN story. Earlier today, @NaomiOhReally reported that UN staff had been instructed not to use the words "war" or "invasion" to refer to Russia's invasion of, and war on, Ukraine. irishtimes.com/news/world/uni…
This is obviously problematic because, in the name of trying to be impartial, they're adopting the Russian narrative. The New York Times pulled out of Russia today, in part because it's now punishable by up to 15 years in prison to describe what's happening as a war. Which it is.
So, while Russians and journalists risk long prison terms to speak the truth, the UN is instructing its staff not to.
MOREOVER, in response to the story, an official UN account @UN_Spokesperson smeared @NaomiOhReally as a liar, calling the story "fake" and baldly denying it.
About Ukraine's EU aspirations — which I fully support, as do most Ukrainians! — important to understand how arduous the process is, and for good reason. Read this whole story, but key bits in next tweets: nytimes.com/2022/03/04/wor…
"There are 35 chapters of accession negotiations, each relating to a policy area in which the candidate country is being asked to make changes — both judicial and practical — to align itself with the European Union standards."
"Work on specific chapters can stall for years, and any progress is subject to a constant monitoring of the standards of the candidate country’s court and judicial systems, as well as the quality of its democratic institutions."